Nebraska is only state not continuing emergency supplemental food assistance during pandemic
Source: Omaha World Herald
By Martha Stoddard , Paul Hammel
LINCOLN Jobless workers and struggling families in Nebraska are having to make do without two federally funded coronavirus relief programs.
Nebraska is one of two states that have not yet opted to give unemployed workers an extra $300 a week in federal unemployment aid. The other state, South Dakota, has refused the money.
Gov. Pete Ricketts said officials are reviewing President Donald Trumps executive order that made the money available to states.
In addition, Nebraska is the only state not to continue emergency supplemental food assistance beyond July.
Read more: https://omaha.com/news/state-and-regional/govt-and-politics/nebraska-is-only-state-not-continuing-emergency-supplemental-food-assistance-during-pandemic/article_fa3dea43-ab31-59c2-a9b7-91fd181f92c7.html#tracking-source=home-top-story-1
TwilightZone
(25,471 posts)NE, in particular, is hyper-obsessed with taxes and "others" benefiting from social programs, so they refuse to fund pretty much anything other than corporate welfare appropriately.
The ironic thing is that there's a massive amount of money in places like Omaha, but self-centered nonsense that seems entrenched in the culture means that a lot of schools are sub-par, the roads suck, social programs suffer, and so on.
Meanwhile, Omaha has possibly the best zoo in the world because rich people love to donate large amounts of cash to projects like that as long as they get to put their names on them in big letters.
BumRushDaShow
(129,107 posts)to continue a certain waiver for the free breakfasts/lunches for children past the summer - until huge bipartisan outrage ensued and he reversed that. Without the waiver, families picking up food for their children would have needed to provide a school ID PIN in order to receive the meals (that would have normally been provided in the schools, where most of the schools around here are virtual).
Some details on that -
by Alfred Lubrano, Updated: September 1, 2020- 6:33 PM
As Philadelphias school year begins Wednesday with remote learning, the U.S. Department of Agriculture has given in to bipartisan pressure from Congress and announced it will eliminate red tape that would have made it difficult for children at home to access school meals. For the USDA, this reverses a highly unpopular stance taken by the Trump administration during a pandemic thats plunged families into unemployment and poverty.
Beginning in March, the USDA relaxed its own complex regulations and allowed families to pick up breakfast and lunch at schools or other sites, since their children were compelled to learn virtually from home. As a result, many more children were able to eat. But during the summer, the agency said it would end the waivers once the school year started, claiming it didnt have permission or money from Congress to continue. While we want to provide as much flexibility as local school districts need during this pandemic, Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue said last month, the scope of this request is beyond what USDA currently has the authority to implement.
In a stunning barrage of letters to the USDA, members of Congress disagreed, saying they had indeed given the agency the wherewithal to allow the feeding to continue. Calling the agencys refusal to extend all school meal waivers baffling during this national crisis in which 17 million U.S. children didnt have enough to eat this summer, Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D., Mich.) wrote Perdue last month that there was no basis to his claim that he lacks standing to continue waivers. We urge you to immediately reverse your decision, she concluded.
Perdue evidently relented, saying Monday, Today, we are ... extending summer meal program flexibilities for as long as we can, legally and financially. He said the extension would last at least until Dec. 31. Speculation has arisen that the USDA made it difficult to continue feeding kids who were learning virtually because the Trump administration wanted schools open for in-person learning. Administration officials denied that. The USDA decision not to extend waivers was unpopular among both Republicans and Democrats, managing to unite unlikely partners such as Sens. Mitch McConnell (R., Ky.) and Bob Casey (D., Pa.), both of whom opposed the agencys position.
https://www.inquirer.com/news/philadelphia-schools-free-lunch-congress-usda-poverty-children-20200901.html
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)He's a good Catholic though he says...
CrispyQ
(36,478 posts)They are mean, nasty fucks who shouldn't be anywhere near positions that make public policy.