Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bill

(368 posts)
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 02:26 PM Oct 2012

Skydiver lands safely after historic jump from edge of space

Source: CNN

Skydiver Felix Baumgartner landed safely on the ground Sunday after a record-shattering free fall from the edge of space.

"He made it -- tears of joy from Mission Control," the team said in a live feed.



Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/14/us/skydiver-record-attempt/index.html?hpt=hp_t2



A new record of 127,000+ feet, with Joe Kittinger acting as capcom

97 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Skydiver lands safely after historic jump from edge of space (Original Post) bill Oct 2012 OP
That was one of the coolest thing I have ever seen. He was flipping early then got it under control sarcasmo Oct 2012 #1
that was awesome and crazy. Congrats Felix! TeamPooka Oct 2012 #2
but did he break the sound barrier? Viva_La_Revolution Oct 2012 #3
Dunno either. Does anyone? ffr Oct 2012 #13
Yes, he did muriel_volestrangler Oct 2012 #17
Well, that may be a matter of semantics BlueStreak Oct 2012 #76
No, it's physics, not semantics muriel_volestrangler Oct 2012 #78
My point is that it is not a precise speed BlueStreak Oct 2012 #79
It's not arbitrary muriel_volestrangler Oct 2012 #80
"Breaking the sound barrier" implies a concussion / shock wave BlueStreak Oct 2012 #81
It would be heard in a cone behind the falling man muriel_volestrangler Oct 2012 #83
Thanks. Interesting. BlueStreak Oct 2012 #86
Any concussion would be really faint at those air pressures Posteritatis Oct 2012 #97
He also broke the record for greatest height ever ascended in a balloon at over 127,000 feet. go west young man Oct 2012 #28
That was pretty incredible lucabrasi Oct 2012 #4
ROFLMAO!!!!!!! That's freakin' HILARIOUS!!!!! calimary Oct 2012 #23
Cool, that's another little Star Trek hurdle out of the way. Uncle Joe Oct 2012 #5
there's still one more.. bill Oct 2012 #9
OH, yeah! Maynar Oct 2012 #31
LOVE IT!!!! calimary Oct 2012 #27
That was seriously cool. Odin2005 Oct 2012 #6
totally AWESOME!!!! FirstLight Oct 2012 #7
What an amazing feat Marksman_91 Oct 2012 #8
Welcome to DU, Marksman_91! calimary Oct 2012 #29
did not know that was Joe Kittinger.. frylock Oct 2012 #10
I agree PD Turk Oct 2012 #14
Same here GliderGuider Oct 2012 #37
I agree... awoke_in_2003 Oct 2012 #49
Here is the video of Joe Kittinger's jump FarPoint Oct 2012 #56
Yup PD Turk Oct 2012 #62
This man is simply amazing... FarPoint Oct 2012 #63
I've read this book twice PD Turk Oct 2012 #66
Does anyone have the video from the jump? sakabatou Oct 2012 #11
here it is PD Turk Oct 2012 #16
Cool sakabatou Oct 2012 #19
767 at sea level PD Turk Oct 2012 #26
Oh right... forgot about that sakabatou Oct 2012 #33
From CNN: UnrepentantLiberal Oct 2012 #40
Huzzuh for science! sakabatou Oct 2012 #45
That was awesome. UnrepentantLiberal Oct 2012 #41
How long until it's in a commercial that says "RedBull gives you wiiiings" IVoteDFL Oct 2012 #12
Of course it was; there's a reason the whole jump's named after them. Posteritatis Oct 2012 #15
Well, if I were on their marketing team, that's absolutely what I'd be thinking. calimary Oct 2012 #32
That is a very good thought! Great Caesars Ghost Oct 2012 #92
what??? heaven05 Oct 2012 #18
One question... KansDem Oct 2012 #20
not sure PD Turk Oct 2012 #21
That makes sense! KansDem Oct 2012 #24
Yeah, he opened his chute earlier than he planned. (nt) Posteritatis Oct 2012 #22
Thanks! KansDem Oct 2012 #25
I wonder if he did it on purpose... awoke_in_2003 Oct 2012 #50
Could be; he might have also been rattled from the spin, too Posteritatis Oct 2012 #51
True. nt awoke_in_2003 Oct 2012 #96
because.. bill Oct 2012 #35
Thanks! KansDem Oct 2012 #84
I watched every minute Smilo Oct 2012 #30
I would never go skydiving Captain_truthteller Oct 2012 #34
I have. I always wanted to try it. RebelOne Oct 2012 #73
AWESOME!!! underpants Oct 2012 #36
CNN is saying he hit Mach 1.24 top speed Ruby the Liberal Oct 2012 #38
Umm, not to be a killjoy, but why do we care? primavera Oct 2012 #39
Lots of biometric data. AtheistCrusader Oct 2012 #43
Exactly! FarPoint Oct 2012 #53
Data was collected to try create escape systems... Frank Cannon Oct 2012 #44
Okay, that's pretty cool primavera Oct 2012 #46
Why do people climb mountains or take solo journeys across the ocean? XemaSab Oct 2012 #47
Because sometimes life can be fun and amazing? UnrepentantLiberal Oct 2012 #48
And if he had perished? primavera Oct 2012 #58
For the last year PD Turk Oct 2012 #65
Sorry about your mom, I agree with you.. Fumesucker Oct 2012 #67
Thanks Fumesucker PD Turk Oct 2012 #68
I'm so sorry primavera Oct 2012 #70
Thanks PD Turk Oct 2012 #88
Recent research shows that daredevil stunts by men are more appealing to women daleo Oct 2012 #52
Uh Oh PD Turk Oct 2012 #89
People probably asked the same thing of the Wright brothers' little stunts, too. kestrel91316 Oct 2012 #54
The Wright brothers had a vision primavera Oct 2012 #59
I'm thinking this proves that could be used as part of an astronaut rescue system TrogL Oct 2012 #55
Sometimes "Fucking Awesome" is all the reason one needs. nt Codeine Oct 2012 #57
Yes, that certainly would have been a fine epitaph primavera Oct 2012 #60
I certainly understand those who are confused by humanities attempt to push itself beyond its define LanternWaste Oct 2012 #90
+1000 PD Turk Oct 2012 #61
Well, it did set a new record for Youtube simulcast viewers BlueStreak Oct 2012 #87
Billions and Billions of humans on this planet.. snooper2 Oct 2012 #69
Volunteering? primavera Oct 2012 #71
Nah, how about I try to drive from Vegas to Anaheim in 3 hours flat snooper2 Oct 2012 #72
Umm, you are being a killjoy. Why do anything for fun that involves an element of risk? Throd Oct 2012 #85
Good question primavera Oct 2012 #94
The Boundary to Space or Edge of Space triplepoint Oct 2012 #42
pfft! - Captain Kirk did it first Adenoid_Hynkel Oct 2012 #64
Awesome! burrowowl Oct 2012 #74
what courage... MrsBrady Oct 2012 #75
Kudos to Joe Kittinger jsr Oct 2012 #77
I finally saw it! lunatica Oct 2012 #82
It'll be only a very short amount of time before...... Great Caesars Ghost Oct 2012 #91
That guy cojones Lucy Fer Oct 2012 #93
Wow. Solly Mack Oct 2012 #95

sarcasmo

(23,968 posts)
1. That was one of the coolest thing I have ever seen. He was flipping early then got it under control
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 02:27 PM
Oct 2012

muriel_volestrangler

(101,319 posts)
17. Yes, he did
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 03:40 PM
Oct 2012
20.00 (13.00) He achieved the fastest ever freefall speed at 706mph during the four minutes and 19 seconds of free, according to spokesman Sarah Anderson, but she confirmed that he did not set a new record for the longest freefall.

19.53 (12.53) Felix Baumgartner did break the sound barrier, a spokesman has just confirmed.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/space/9607604/Skydiver-Felix-Baumgartner-attempts-to-break-sound-barrier-live.html
 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
76. Well, that may be a matter of semantics
Mon Oct 15, 2012, 12:20 AM
Oct 2012

It was a marvelous achievement and that guy has nerves of steel. Very cool.

But as far as the "sound barrier" thing goes, that "barrier" is a bit ambiguous, varying with air pressure and temperature. And considering he achieves that speed in a super thin atmosphere, the concept of "sound" is pretty iffy. If you don't have an atmosphere, you can't really have sound waves.

The claim really should be that he passed the speed where, in our normal atmosphere, he would have set off a sonic boom. But that speed in the atmosphere would have been instantly fatal without a protective capsule. It would have ripped his body apart.

What is really amazing is how long the previous record stood.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,319 posts)
78. No, it's physics, not semantics
Mon Oct 15, 2012, 05:18 AM
Oct 2012

First of all, the 'barrier' is not ambiguous; the point about it is that is describes the behaviour of a fluid, and has real implications on how the fluid reacts to a body moving through it. There is enough atmosphere at that level to still measure the behaviour.

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
79. My point is that it is not a precise speed
Mon Oct 15, 2012, 08:26 AM
Oct 2012

During the real time display, I didn't see the velocity go above 720. The "speed of sound" is something like 760 MPH, but that is at sea level. The speed varies widely.

After the jump, the team said his peak speed was in the 800s, so that is certainly above the "speed of sound" in the normal atmosphere.

Was there a "sonic boom" or did he just go faster than an arbitrary number? "Breaking the sound barrier" implies a boom, even if it is a small one.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,319 posts)
80. It's not arbitrary
Mon Oct 15, 2012, 08:44 AM
Oct 2012

And, clearly, if he reached a maximum speed, then air resistance must have been what limited the speed. The current figure is reckoned to be 1342 km/h (834 mph - Mach 1.24 at that height, which gives a speed of sound of 673 mph at that height), or 373 m/s. Without air resistance, you'd reach that in 38 seconds. He didn't open a parachute until over 4 minutes into the fall; air resistance obviously did matter, even in the early stages of the fall.

I disagree about a 'boom' being part of breaking the sound barrier; as I said, it's about the physics of the airflow around him.

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
81. "Breaking the sound barrier" implies a concussion / shock wave
Mon Oct 15, 2012, 08:59 AM
Oct 2012

Did such a shock happen? Has it been measured?

That was a question before the jump. If he "broke the barrier", would that be dangerous? We know that when aircraft do this in the normal atmosphere, creating an audible shock wave, this puts a lot of stress on the aircraft. I have not heard anything that indicates Baumgartner experienced anything like that. In fact, just the opposite. He said he really didn't feel anything -- no rippling of his jump suit. No wind noise, etc.

I don't mean to minimize the significance of this event. But I just question the imagery of him "breaking the sound barrier". It seems he did not do so in the sense most people understand that term (i.e. a sonic boom), although he went pretty darned fast.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,319 posts)
83. It would be heard in a cone behind the falling man
Mon Oct 15, 2012, 09:27 AM
Oct 2012

where there wasn't anything to record it, apart from possibly the gondola.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonic_boom

Newshost:
Charles White, Poland asks: What does one hear aboard a supersonic aircraft during and after breaking the sound barrier?


Peter Benn:
You don't actually hear anything on board. All we see is the pressure wave moving down the aeroplane - it gives an indication on the instruments. And that's what we see of Mach 1. But we don't hear the sonic boom or anything like that. That's rather like the wake of ship - it's behind us.


Newshost:
Those passengers on board, sitting back in their leather seats and watching that Mach 1 speedo in front - what do they see, what do they feel?


Peter Benn:
They see the cabin display which shows the aircraft's altitude, groundspeed and Mach number which is the relationship to speed of sound. They see the indicator go through the figure 1 and then they know they've gone supersonic.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/talking_point/3207470.stm


The 'barrier' was called that because as planes got close to the speed of sound, their aerodynamic surfaces, especially the control surfaces, started behaving in unexpected ways - which made some think you'd never be able to control a plane going through that range. But they worked out what was happening.

The effect on the pressure suit does seem to have been small. Exactly how much that was expected, either through computer simulations, or through any testing they'd done (there are supersonic wind tunnels), I don't know. I think they said the pressure of air inside gave a certain rigidity to it at high altitude that helped him maintain the correct posture.
 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
86. Thanks. Interesting.
Mon Oct 15, 2012, 01:58 PM
Oct 2012

David Benner used to tell a joke abut the first guy who ever drank milk. I wouldn't have to guts to do that, let alone what Baumgartner did. But I did jump off a 150' high bridge with only a Bungee cord wrapped around a towel on my ankles with no safety harness.

Once. Never again.

Posteritatis

(18,807 posts)
97. Any concussion would be really faint at those air pressures
Mon Oct 15, 2012, 11:20 PM
Oct 2012

The density of the atmosphere at that altitude is a fraction of a percent of what it is at sea level - it's not vacuum, but it's more than close enough by the standards of anything that has "air" in one of the top positions on its "don't know how I could live without this" list.

Think of it as the difference between moving your hand quickly through water and moving your hand quickly through fog. There's much, much less pushing back in the latter, but both of those might as well be solid concrete compared to the air pressure at 120,000 feet. If there was an observer tagging along behind him, they might not even hear the boom or feel a shockwave, because there wouldn't be enough air hanging around to transmit sound or sensation.

A human breaking the sound barrier closer to sea level would have "closed casket service" on his to-do list afterwards. At that height doing so would involve breaking through something that was insubstantial in the first place.

calimary

(81,277 posts)
23. ROFLMAO!!!!!!! That's freakin' HILARIOUS!!!!!
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 04:11 PM
Oct 2012

Shared! Stolen! OMG!!!!

Just really happy we CAN be joking about this. After all, the guy DID have a successful landing that he didn't just walk but trotted away from! Broke records not bones!

Nevertheless, if I were a Red Bull merchandiser, I'd be envisioning those images on every Red Bull store display on the planet!

FirstLight

(13,360 posts)
7. totally AWESOME!!!!
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 02:49 PM
Oct 2012

I made my kids watch too...we were all glued to the computer!

You realize this is about as close to a 'moon-walk' moment my kids' generation will have?

 

Marksman_91

(2,035 posts)
8. What an amazing feat
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 02:50 PM
Oct 2012

This guy is the definition of balls of steel. Congratulations to him and the Red Bull Stratos team.

calimary

(81,277 posts)
29. Welcome to DU, Marksman_91!
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 04:19 PM
Oct 2012

No kidding! Can you just imagine... Break records, not bones!

Glad you're here! We need you! 'Cause this thing isn't nailed down yet.





Now get to work.

PD Turk

(1,289 posts)
14. I agree
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 03:20 PM
Oct 2012

The fact that Little Joe helped him out through this whole thing just makes it that much cooler. I've been a JK fan for a long time. He's pretty sharp for being 84 years old.

 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
37. Same here
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 05:05 PM
Oct 2012

When I was 16, JK was the only man who could match the X-15 pilots for cool. The only other guy who qualified for that level of macho was John Stapp. Not even the Mercury guys measured up in my eyes.

FarPoint

(12,399 posts)
56. Here is the video of Joe Kittinger's jump
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 06:24 PM
Oct 2012

August, 1960!\\I never knew about Joe Kittinger until today............Amazing!




PD Turk

(1,289 posts)
62. Yup
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 07:42 PM
Oct 2012

Back then he was wearing a AF high altitude pressure suit and his balloon gondola was basically a platform with a canvas curtain around it. One of his gloves failed to pressurize on the way up and his hand swelled to twice its normal size, but he soldiered on and completed the jump.

"Little Joe" Kittinger weighed all of 150 lb soaking wet...... of which 50 lbs was his balls!

FarPoint

(12,399 posts)
63. This man is simply amazing...
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 07:46 PM
Oct 2012

His history.......jaw dropping!

He has the "Right Stuff" and then some.

 

UnrepentantLiberal

(11,700 posts)
40. From CNN:
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 05:23 PM
Oct 2012
According to Brian Utley, an official observer on the site, the Austrian man dubbed "Fearless Felix" at one point fell as fast as Mach 1.24, well above the speed of sound, with nothing but a space suit, helmet and parachute, his support team said.

IVoteDFL

(417 posts)
12. How long until it's in a commercial that says "RedBull gives you wiiiings"
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 03:16 PM
Oct 2012

I'll bet this is what they had in mind the entire time.

Posteritatis

(18,807 posts)
15. Of course it was; there's a reason the whole jump's named after them.
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 03:31 PM
Oct 2012

(Still awesome though, even if I can't stand really ostentatious "sponsorship" like that.)

calimary

(81,277 posts)
32. Well, if I were on their marketing team, that's absolutely what I'd be thinking.
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 04:30 PM
Oct 2012

In every Red Bull store display on the planet! Probably could get a few more stores that way too...

 
92. That is a very good thought!
Mon Oct 15, 2012, 03:50 PM
Oct 2012

He jumped for the corporations. I totally agree that should never have been commercially sponsored.

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
20. One question...
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 03:57 PM
Oct 2012

If Baumgartner jumped from a higher height than Kittinger, then why didn't he also set a record for longest free fall?

I watched the jump and believe I heard he set new records for height and speed, but not longest free fall. Did he have to open his 'chute earlier due to the speed?

PD Turk

(1,289 posts)
21. not sure
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 04:02 PM
Oct 2012

not sure what altitude he popped his chute at, but the reason he might have had a shorter elapsed free fall time is that he had a lot higher initial speed toward the top of the jump and it carried on down allowing him to cover the distance faster.

 

awoke_in_2003

(34,582 posts)
50. I wonder if he did it on purpose...
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 05:47 PM
Oct 2012

so Joe Kittinger could retain one of the records. If so, that is pretty classy.

Posteritatis

(18,807 posts)
51. Could be; he might have also been rattled from the spin, too
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 05:50 PM
Oct 2012

Spending thirty seconds getting beaten up by your own helmet's gotta be disorienting somewhat.

bill

(368 posts)
35. because..
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 04:57 PM
Oct 2012

Kittinger wasn't really in freefall, he was in drougefall (like a tandem skydive). Felix was falling faster, especially at teh beginning, so freefall time was less even though the distance was greater.

Also, Kittenger was under canopy @ 15K' and used and automatic opener. Felix had a good canopy @ ~6K and didn't need the Cypres

Smilo

(1,944 posts)
30. I watched every minute
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 04:27 PM
Oct 2012

it was wonderful and absolutely great that they had Kittinger be the sole person Baumgartner spoke with.

Great achievement well done all!

RebelOne

(30,947 posts)
73. I have. I always wanted to try it.
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 09:46 PM
Oct 2012

I made 6 jumps before I decided to stop before I broke something. I had a few bad times in the air, mainly when I landed. I was dragged by the chute through rocks when the wind caught it, got lost in the air and couldn't find the drop zone and landed on my butt quite often.

primavera

(5,191 posts)
39. Umm, not to be a killjoy, but why do we care?
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 05:22 PM
Oct 2012

Did he discover a cure for some disease, or how to repair our failing ozone layer and reverse global climate change, or end world hunger, or bring back vital, previously unknown scientific knowledge? Does he have anything, anything at all, to show for having intentionally placed himself in an environment utterly hostile to life?

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
43. Lots of biometric data.
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 05:31 PM
Oct 2012

Lots of materials data. His suit stood up to it. His body stood up to it. Might re-imagine possible escape scenarios for future human space travel.

FarPoint

(12,399 posts)
53. Exactly!
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 06:00 PM
Oct 2012

The shuttles did not have an escape opportunity....

This was fantastic. Until today...I never knew anything about the great Kittinger either.

Frank Cannon

(7,570 posts)
44. Data was collected to try create escape systems...
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 05:33 PM
Oct 2012

And other safety features for astronauts. The medical director for this project lost his wife in the 2003 Space Shuttle disaster.

 

UnrepentantLiberal

(11,700 posts)
48. Because sometimes life can be fun and amazing?
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 05:41 PM
Oct 2012

Aren't there kids you need to be chasing off your lawn?

primavera

(5,191 posts)
58. And if he had perished?
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 07:23 PM
Oct 2012

As he might well have? Would his death have been equally "fun and amazing"? You are quite right: life is amazing. Which is why it is a gift not to be squandered recklessly.

However, as others have pointed out, there was greater benefit to this endeavour than merely to provide you with fun and amusing sport and that's great, I'm glad that the risks he took were meaningful. It would have been a tragic waste had he died and accomplished no greater purpose than to give you a cheap thrill.

PD Turk

(1,289 posts)
65. For the last year
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 07:54 PM
Oct 2012

For the last year or so I've been watching my mom waste away in a nursing home. She can't hear, can barely see, has been paralyzed from a stroke for 17 years and is suffering from severe dementia. She refuses to eat and is slowly starving herself to death.

After watching this for the last year, I've developed a different point of view on death and dying. If he had died in the attempt today, sure, it would have been tragic, but it could have been a lot worse.

Given the choice I'd much rather die like that than the way mom is going

PD Turk

(1,289 posts)
68. Thanks Fumesucker
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 09:09 PM
Oct 2012

I ride motorcycles, I've always thought that would be as good of a way to go as any

primavera

(5,191 posts)
70. I'm so sorry
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 09:33 PM
Oct 2012

I've watched loved ones die slowly from terminal illnesses and I agree with you that there are far better ways of going.

daleo

(21,317 posts)
52. Recent research shows that daredevil stunts by men are more appealing to women
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 05:58 PM
Oct 2012

If they have a socially useful purpose, such as raising money for charity or for scientific/medical research purposes.

So they are generally framed that way, even though that is sometimes a stretch.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
54. People probably asked the same thing of the Wright brothers' little stunts, too.
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 06:05 PM
Oct 2012

Hey, no tax dollars were spent so I don't understand the whining at ALL.

primavera

(5,191 posts)
59. The Wright brothers had a vision
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 07:29 PM
Oct 2012

They weren't risking their lives in pursuit of an adrenaline rush. Happily, as others here have been gracious enough to inform me, this guy, too, had a greater purpose than mere sensationalism.

TrogL

(32,822 posts)
55. I'm thinking this proves that could be used as part of an astronaut rescue system
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 06:06 PM
Oct 2012

...assuming we ever get another craft like the shuttle.

primavera

(5,191 posts)
60. Yes, that certainly would have been a fine epitaph
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 07:34 PM
Oct 2012

For his headstone and no doubt a great comfort to his family and friends had he died. But, yet again, I'm told that his venture did achieve something more than being just "fucking awesome," whatever that means.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
90. I certainly understand those who are confused by humanities attempt to push itself beyond its define
Mon Oct 15, 2012, 03:43 PM
Oct 2012

I certainly understand those who are confused by humanities' attempt to push itself beyond its self-defined and self-imposed limits, regardless of a lack of any practical application.

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
87. Well, it did set a new record for Youtube simulcast viewers
Mon Oct 15, 2012, 02:01 PM
Oct 2012

blowing away the old record by an order of magnitude.

That certainly has some scientific and commercial value.

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
69. Billions and Billions of humans on this planet..
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 09:23 PM
Oct 2012

We can use a few of them for our entertainment..

primavera

(5,191 posts)
71. Volunteering?
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 09:35 PM
Oct 2012

Maybe you could jump the Grand Canyon and put your attempt on pay per view. It'd be fucking awesome.

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
72. Nah, how about I try to drive from Vegas to Anaheim in 3 hours flat
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 09:40 PM
Oct 2012

Have to run that by the wife though before our trip

Luckily I don't have to volunteer because there are plenty of folks out there willing to do crazy/stupid/death defying/darwin award type stunts anyway. Just spend a little time on YouTube. And those are the ones TV producers don't even bother with LOL

primavera

(5,191 posts)
94. Good question
Mon Oct 15, 2012, 04:45 PM
Oct 2012

But the question I asked was not why some people risk their lives for fun, or even why Baumgartner chose to risk his life in this endeavor, but why we should care. And that question has now been answered.

 

triplepoint

(431 posts)
42. The Boundary to Space or Edge of Space
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 05:26 PM
Oct 2012

With data from a new instrument developed by scientists at the University of Calgary, scientists confirmed that space begins 73 miles (118 kilometers) above Earth's surface.

The United States, however, has never officially adopted a set boundary standard because it would complicate the issue of overflight rights of satellites and other orbiting bodies, according to NASA.

Reference Link:
http://www.space.com/6564-edge-space.html


When I took "Orbital Mechanics" in college, the instructor claimed that the "Edge of the Sensible Atmosphere" was 400,000 ft (75.75 statute miles).

jsr

(7,712 posts)
77. Kudos to Joe Kittinger
Mon Oct 15, 2012, 02:32 AM
Oct 2012

Kittinger's contributions were clearly indispensable throughout the whole thing.

 
91. It'll be only a very short amount of time before......
Mon Oct 15, 2012, 03:46 PM
Oct 2012

someone will attempt the first space jump, more than likely from the ISS.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Skydiver lands safely aft...