GOP congressman calls abortion talk with mistress ‘imprudent approach,’ denies hypocrisy
Source: Associated Press
GOP congressman calls abortion talk with mistress imprudent approach, denies hypocrisy
By Associated Press, Updated: Monday, October 15, 3:09 PM
NASHVILLE, Tenn. A Republican congressman from Tennessee is telling supporters hes not a hypocrite for discussing abortion with a mistress more than a decade ago. But now he may also have to defend his medical license.
Rep. Scott DesJarlais, a physician who opposes abortion rights, said in a letter that he was deeply sorry that supporters had to find out about the relationship with a patient that occurred while DesJarlais was separated from his first wife. But he said he used stark language about traveling to Atlanta to get an abortion try to get the woman to acknowledge that she wasnt pregnant.
I appreciate that this was an imprudent approach to this situation and Im not proud of it, DesJarlais wrote in the letter. In retrospect I should have dealt with these matters in a more diplomatic fashion.
I am not trying to justify my actions or say that I am without fault, he said. But I am not the hypocrite my opponents and some liberal media outlets are portraying me as.
Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/gop-congressman-calls-abortion-talk-with-mistress-imprudent-approach-denies-hypocrisy/2012/10/15/6843abf2-16e8-11e2-a346-f24efc680b8d_story.html
Downwinder
(12,869 posts)Just a plain old SOB.
lastlib
(23,238 posts)I can go with that.
pscot
(21,024 posts)in Websters Unabridged Dictionary.
immoderate
(20,885 posts)A kind of non-apology...
--imm
calimary
(81,283 posts)I remember during the 2000 campaign when word got out that laura bush had actually killed somebody by smashing into him with her car. She was much younger, I think either in high school or just a little afterwards. But she was driving and smashed into this guy's car and KILLED HIM.
And her response was - "I'm sorry it happened and I'm sorry it was reported."
They're just sorry YOU manage to find out about some of their shit. This is a consistent thread for these assholes. What they REALLY, HONESTLY (if you can use the word "honesty" in any application to these folks) are sorry for - is that news about their shit actually got out to the people.
hamsterjill
(15,220 posts)The really and truly believe that if they just keep denying it long enough, that everyone will believe them sooner or later.
What a shithead!
valerief
(53,235 posts)eyewall
(674 posts)Republican voters will believe anything a republican politician says if it's repeated often enough. Plus he blamed it on the "liberal media" so the facts shouldn't be taken seriously.
Shrike47
(6,913 posts)Ash_F
(5,861 posts)louis-t
(23,295 posts)even thought she wasn't pregnant".
Volaris
(10,271 posts)Isn't it nice of the good Congressman to let us in on which button to push that REALLY bother them.....
"I am not trying to justify my actions or say that I am without fault, he said. But I am not the hypocrite my opponents and some liberal media outlets are portraying me as.
What he means is, we can call him a SOB dirty SINNER all we want, because he knows that the REAL damage comes with the Public Perception that there is one set of Rules for US, and another set for all those Little People.
Well Congressman, how about "Fuck you. THAT'S my name." as an appropriate response.
guappo1
(53 posts)With out having the dog poop laying around it is hard to prove that story.
So when DesJarlais tell his story He could say anything about what his intent was,
but I hope most people will not buy into that Dog crap.
Javaman
(62,530 posts)it's only hypocrisy when someone other than Scott DesJarlais does it.
reflection
(6,286 posts)Not buying this one either.
benld74
(9,904 posts)Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)Tsiyu
(18,186 posts)he is running ads now; don't know how much the Dem Party is helping.
The Dem Party refused to help Dem incumbent Lincoln Davis; Grover Norquist gave us the Teabagger DesJarLAID.
So I'm hoping with this new development, the party will kick in for Stewart this time around.
DesJarLAID is funded from outside TN.
olddad56
(5,732 posts)That seems to be a theme among all of the republican scumbags who get their secrets exposed.
They are not sorry for doing something inappropriate, they are only sorry their supporters found out. They are sorry that it impacts their ability to con older, conservative, naive, wealthy people out of donating money to their war chests. It doesn't bother them in the least that they did something unethical, it bothers them that it will cost them money and votes.
And I suppose they lose a bit of status among the con artist community for getting their cover blown.
olddad56
(5,732 posts)but he wouldn't be sorry that he cheated on his taxes, he would be sorry that the voters found out.
Liberal Veteran
(22,239 posts)Rider3
(919 posts)Give the guy a dictionary.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)1.a person who pretends to have virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that he or she does not actually possess, especially a person whose actions belie stated beliefs.
2.a person who feigns some desirable or publicly approved attitude, especially one whose private life, opinions, or statements belie his or her public statements.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/hypocrite
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Scott DesJarlais
DC Address:
The "Honorable" Scott DesJarlais
United States House of Representatives
413 Cannon House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515-4204
DC Phone: 202-225-6831
DC Fax: 202-226-5172
Contact Form: http://desjarlais.house.gov/contact/
Twitter: @DesJarlaisTN04
District Offices:
807 South Garden Street
Columbia, TN 38401 Voice: 931-381-9920
FAX: 931-381-9945
62 East Second Street
Crossville, TN 38555 Voice: 931-707-9091
FAX: 931-707-9100
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Don C. Nuttin
(84 posts)Deeply sorry, Congressman? Sorry is as sorry does.
JohnnyRingo
(18,633 posts)He now claims he discussed going to Atlanta to get his girlfriend to admit she wasn't pregnant. There's no more mention how the pregnancy turned out, but I assume she ended up not so.
I think it's far more likely that they quietly carried out their plans to abort the fetus at a clinic in Atlanta than his girlfriend was making it up. The congressman is counting on the legal discretion of the clinic, as he well should be able to.
Still, i think he's a liar and a hypocrite
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)to be 'pro marriage and proud of it'. Forget the rest, that alone is enough to place him in the top eschelon of hypocrites, even among the highly competitive Republican division. Oh, yeah, I like that the story notes he was cheating on his wife, but not the wife he has right now, his first wife! Sanctity o' marriage on parade!
Berlum
(7,044 posts)freaking sleazeball etch-a-sketch hypocrite wank artistes (R)
Liberalagogo
(1,770 posts)WTF does that even MEAN?
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)as a physician and married man...is there a prudent way to do that?
classykaren
(769 posts)I thought it was not true but I found out it was true had his record sealed for disorderly conduct.
BrainGlutton23
(37 posts)which a doctor is not supposed to have, generally speaking. Which does not speak well of DesJarlais' propensity to observe codes of ethics, generally speaking.
KansDem
(28,498 posts)"On the Issues" with Scott DesJarlais:
Pro-life and PROUD OF IT. (Nov 2010)
Voted YES on banning federal health coverage that includes abortion. (May 2011)
Supports prohibiting human embryonic stem cell research. (Aug 2010)
Opposes federal abortion funding. (Aug 2010)
Prohibit federal funding for abortion. (May 2011)
Prohibiting forced abortions by UN Population Fund. (May 2011)
http://www.ontheissues.org/House/Scott_DesJarlais.htm
F*cking, smarmy POS and hypocrite!
oldhippydude
(2,514 posts)look how they trounced David Vitter (not)...
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Shrike47 This message was self-deleted by its author.
mac56
(17,569 posts)to try to get the woman to acknowledge that she wasn't pregnant."
Oh puh-leeze.
kiranon
(1,727 posts)Funny how those against abortion know where one can be obtained if needed and won't have qualms about their "love interest" getting one. His excuse/denial sounds like don't look at the pretty stone over there (abortion), look at the new one (just a way to get at the truth about her pregnancy) and forget about the other one even existing at all. He hopes diversion will work with his constituents and it probably will.