Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AntiFascist

(12,792 posts)
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 03:34 AM Oct 2012

5.3 earthquake jolts Central Coast, epicenter closest to King City

Source: KSBW

SANTA CRUZ, Calif. —
A 5.3 earthquake rattled night owls who were still awake at 11:58 p.m. Saturday on the Central Coast.

The closest city to the epicenter was King City, which was 16 miles west of the quake, according to the U.S. Geological Survey.


Residents as far north as Santa Cruz felt a strong rumble from the quake.



Read more: http://www.ksbw.com/news/central-california/salinas/5-3-earthquake-jolts-Central-Coast-epicenter-closest-to-King-City/-/5738906/17072972/-/13ncegyz/-/index.html#ixzz29utNud73



This is right on the San Andreas fault.
52 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
5.3 earthquake jolts Central Coast, epicenter closest to King City (Original Post) AntiFascist Oct 2012 OP
I felt the earthquake FredisDead Oct 2012 #1
4 more small quakes in the last hour... AntiFascist Oct 2012 #5
This is normal stuff ... Wernothelpless Oct 2012 #7
Yep. Preference is for many small quakes opposed to one big one. Auggie Oct 2012 #10
I live in New Mexico now, but..... vduhr Oct 2012 #13
Actually, you don't know that it's not a foreshock --the Loma Prieta 7.1 had 5.0 foreshock CreekDog Oct 2012 #17
Well,California shakes pretty constantly ... Wernothelpless Oct 2012 #19
you just posted that it wasn't a foreshock CreekDog Oct 2012 #20
I believe I posted that it's all pretty normal stuff and CA is shaking all the time ... Wernothelpless Oct 2012 #21
Ok, sure it's normal, though it could be a foreshock, but most 5's aren't foreshocks of 7's, true CreekDog Oct 2012 #25
How terrifying ... Wernothelpless Oct 2012 #26
What? CreekDog Oct 2012 #27
Are you ok? mimi85 Oct 2012 #29
I don't think you're going to last long here. kestrel91316 Oct 2012 #31
I had a geology professor in SF that said it always rains before an earthquake. CreekDog Oct 2012 #39
C'mon, everyone knows that's bullshit. However, I do have a cat that sleeps 12+ hours petronius Oct 2012 #46
! CreekDog Oct 2012 #47
You've got a lot of nerve coming on DU and pretty much immediately kestrel91316 Oct 2012 #30
I posted that it's all pretty normal October stuff earthquake wise ... Wernothelpless Oct 2012 #33
You posted uncalled-for nastiness against more than one good, kestrel91316 Oct 2012 #37
Wrong thread Trajan Oct 2012 #50
I gotta say .... This poster did nothing wrong .... Trajan Oct 2012 #51
As someone who experienced the Northridge Quake... AntiFascist Oct 2012 #52
This message was self-deleted by its author FredisDead Oct 2012 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author FredisDead Oct 2012 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author FredisDead Oct 2012 #1
5.3 is pretty significant dballance Oct 2012 #6
Yup. vduhr Oct 2012 #14
Nah, no more than a rattle with little roll ... Wernothelpless Oct 2012 #22
5.3 is significant CreekDog Oct 2012 #28
Thanks for your continued imput ... Wernothelpless Oct 2012 #34
i live here too CreekDog Oct 2012 #36
Got a middle of the night tweet from my daughter... noel711 Oct 2012 #8
Rockin' and a rollin' in California davidpdx Oct 2012 #9
is it bad that when I see earthquake news, if its Cali and under 6.0 I ignore it. lol JesterCS Oct 2012 #11
No. Le Taz Hot Oct 2012 #12
That made me laugh. vduhr Oct 2012 #15
. . . Le Taz Hot Oct 2012 #16
because you're far away from it CreekDog Oct 2012 #18
True ... Wernothelpless Oct 2012 #35
That's kind of where I'm at... AntiFascist Oct 2012 #41
I've lived in California my entire 64 years. olddad56 Oct 2012 #23
it shook a lot in Monterey cynannmarie Oct 2012 #24
STRONG VANUATU QUAKE FOLLOWED BY MODERATE EARTHQUAKES IN ICELAND AND CALIFORNIA Wernothelpless Oct 2012 #32
I ... very much doubt solar flares cause earthquakes. (nt) Posteritatis Oct 2012 #38
I love how you minimize the significance of the earthquake CreekDog Oct 2012 #40
I believe I referred to it as an "interesting speculation" .. not fact ... Wernothelpless Oct 2012 #48
Solar flares???? nadinbrzezinski Oct 2012 #42
Interesting webpage... AntiFascist Oct 2012 #43
Here's what the NOAA has to say about solar flares... AntiFascist Oct 2012 #45
I felt it BadGimp Oct 2012 #44
we live on the san andreas goclark Oct 2012 #49

AntiFascist

(12,792 posts)
5. 4 more small quakes in the last hour...
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 04:14 AM
Oct 2012

http://earthquaketrack.com/us-ca-king-city/recent

19 minutes ago, 3.3 magnitude, 9 km depth
King City, California, United States

29 minutes ago, 2.5 magnitude, 10 km depth
King City, California, United States

33 minutes ago, 3.7 magnitude, 9 km depth
King City, California, United States

1 hour ago, 3.1 magnitude, 8 km depth
King City, California, United States

I hope these aren't foreshocks to a Big One!

Wernothelpless

(410 posts)
7. This is normal stuff ...
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 06:45 AM
Oct 2012

These little aftershocks will continue for the next few weeks, but it's nothing to be concerned about ... same ol' same ol' from my lifetime of experience ... I've always wondered why these occur in the fall ... The central valley heats up into the 100+ degrees all summer long and I've assumed maybe something's just gotta give when it all cools off in the fall ...

Remember the Bay Bridge World Series? ... This most recent 5.4 is a good little rattle, but it's nothing until you get up over 7.1 ... now THAT will really rattle your senses ... that one rattled and then rolled ... a real Eticket ride! ...

vduhr

(603 posts)
13. I live in New Mexico now, but.....
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 10:20 AM
Oct 2012

lived in the Bay Area for 44 years prior, and was there for the 7.1. I was driving home from Oakland after work, and going through Walnut Creek at the time it hit. I remember the damage it did - huge cracks in buildings, like Capwells. Scary, scary time.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
17. Actually, you don't know that it's not a foreshock --the Loma Prieta 7.1 had 5.0 foreshock
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 11:14 AM
Oct 2012

2 months before.

Wernothelpless

(410 posts)
19. Well,California shakes pretty constantly ...
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 12:14 PM
Oct 2012

with quakes of all sizes and there's about a 20% chance of predicting a shock of any kind ... which is less accuracy than we get with weather prediction ... a 5.0 would have had it's own tiny aftershocks that would have gone on for weeks too ... we're in a state that is in constant motion ...

Again, I wonder if they're also keeping record of the earth's temperature in these areas ... King City, for instance, will have been experiencing 100 plus degrees all summer long and last night was the first time it was cool enough for folks to switch on their heat ... the temperature has dropped more than 50 degrees to 48 degrees last night ... how does that affect the pressure that's building? ... the earth is a living thing that expands and then contracts .. she's gonna burp once in awhile ...

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
20. you just posted that it wasn't a foreshock
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 12:25 PM
Oct 2012


you don't know it wasn't a foreshock.

the 5.0 preceding Loma Prieta by some two months is generally considered to be a foreshock to that quake.

would you please remember what you posted minutes ago and not pretend it didn't happen?

Wernothelpless

(410 posts)
21. I believe I posted that it's all pretty normal stuff and CA is shaking all the time ...
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 12:55 PM
Oct 2012

I don't remember offering any specific prediction fore or after ... of any kind ... I've reread what I posted and I don't see what you're protesting to ... having trouble getting your voice heard at home so you need to vent here a bit ... good luck with that, dearie ... xoxo

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
25. Ok, sure it's normal, though it could be a foreshock, but most 5's aren't foreshocks of 7's, true
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 01:59 PM
Oct 2012

because there are far fewer 7's than 5's.

that said, your musing about the weather and earthquakes is more than a bit iffy.

Wernothelpless

(410 posts)
26. How terrifying ...
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 02:02 PM
Oct 2012

"iffy" ... not only iffy but "more than a bit iffy" ...

Quick, call the thought police ... someone is wondering aloud in front of Creekdog ... it must stop! ...

Please, please, forgive us, CreekDog ... how dare we utter an iffy opinion in your presence ... the tragedy of it all ...

Terrifying ... call a moderator! ....



CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
39. I had a geology professor in SF that said it always rains before an earthquake.
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 04:29 PM
Oct 2012

so you may be onto something with your reference to the weather and earthquakes.

He said, "it always rains before an earthquake. sometimes the day before sometimes the year before, but always."

petronius

(26,606 posts)
46. C'mon, everyone knows that's bullshit. However, I do have a cat that sleeps 12+ hours
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 09:57 PM
Oct 2012

during the day before every quake. Every. Single. Quake.

And what was she doing right before that quake last night? Sleeping. QED.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
30. You've got a lot of nerve coming on DU and pretty much immediately
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 02:52 PM
Oct 2012

getting nasty with a good long term DUer.

I suggest you rethink this approach. Otherwise a lot of us might think you need pizza.

Wernothelpless

(410 posts)
33. I posted that it's all pretty normal October stuff earthquake wise ...
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 03:13 PM
Oct 2012

and pondered the effects of temperature and weather ...

Sorry to challenge your thinking here ...

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
37. You posted uncalled-for nastiness against more than one good,
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 03:27 PM
Oct 2012

long-term DUer.

You owe us all an apology. Barring that, maybe FR is more what you're looking for.

 

Trajan

(19,089 posts)
51. I gotta say .... This poster did nothing wrong ....
Sat Oct 27, 2012, 02:42 PM
Oct 2012

They gave their opinion that a 5.3 earthquake in CA is a regular event (true), and apparently other 'long term' DU posters took issue with his/her lack of concern about the imminence of a larger earthquake to quickly follow ....

There was very little nastiness in his/her postings ..... Quite the opposite; just a benign opinion - The 'long term' DUers are being downright mean ....

I wouldn't be any more concerned about a 5.3 quake leading to a much larger quake either, with my concern matching, more or less, the actual probability of such an event actually occurring ....

Just another harangue of an low post-count DUer


Signed,
Long Term Occasionally Mean DUer Who Lived in CA for nearly 4 Decades and Didn't Even Feel Earthquakes That Didn't Exceed 5.0.

Did a bus just drive by ? (<---- Comment by me after a 5.0 quake in LA in the 1970's)

AntiFascist

(12,792 posts)
52. As someone who experienced the Northridge Quake...
Sat Oct 27, 2012, 04:42 PM
Oct 2012

I pay particular attention to anything that might appear to be unusual activity, especially along the San Andreas fault where a major earthquake is expected in the next few decades. Several years before the Northridge quake I recall feeling a strong 5+ shock in the middle of the night along a related fault in the San Fernando Valley, causing books to fly off of shelves. The "much larger quake" doesn't necessarilly have to "immediately" follow the smaller ones.

Response to AntiFascist (Original post)

Response to AntiFascist (Original post)

Response to AntiFascist (Original post)

vduhr

(603 posts)
14. Yup.
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 10:23 AM
Oct 2012

It'll shake you up for sure. When those hit, you wait for it to stop while hoping it doesn't get bigger.

Wernothelpless

(410 posts)
22. Nah, no more than a rattle with little roll ...
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 01:02 PM
Oct 2012

Those of us who have lived with earthquakes in CA all of our lives consider over 7.0 significant ... below that there's usually little if any damage ... if you had a lamp sitting on the edge of a coffee table it might move a bit at 5.3 but probably wouldn't fall ... I remember the Loma Prieta shook a third the water out of my fish tank and I was 20 miles away ... the fish rode it out quite nicely, but the rest of us were pretty shaky for quiet awhile ... I remember forcing myself to drive into Monterey and back because I was somehow afraid of the trees and power lines after the quake and I wanted to get over that as quickly as I could ... so I drove along Hwy. 68 and by the time I arrived in Monterey I was feeling well enough to drive down Hwy 1 and back ...

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
28. 5.3 is significant
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 02:49 PM
Oct 2012

sure, just moderate, but not being a large quake doesn't make it insignificant.

(considering when I questioned you you referred to the "thought police" you shouldn't in the same thread jump on someone for saying a 5.3 earthquake is "significant".)

Wernothelpless

(410 posts)
34. Thanks for your continued imput ...
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 03:16 PM
Oct 2012

It's beyond my expectations ... my experience in the state should hold no significance here and only your opinion as a long time member of the clique ...

Can't you find someone else to play with? ... you're coming off as a bit of a bully ... FWIW ... xoxox

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
36. i live here too
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 03:18 PM
Oct 2012

and welcome to DU, you catch on quick considering you tagged me as part of a clique --an accusation from 2009!

JesterCS

(1,827 posts)
11. is it bad that when I see earthquake news, if its Cali and under 6.0 I ignore it. lol
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 09:06 AM
Oct 2012

I lived in Cali briefly. Near Santa Barbara and Vanderburg AFB

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
18. because you're far away from it
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 11:15 AM
Oct 2012

when they are close, above 5.0 and some of us are looking for cover.

AntiFascist

(12,792 posts)
41. That's kind of where I'm at...
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 05:29 PM
Oct 2012

but we definitely felt this one. I don't know about King City, but I guess it's normal for the Hollister area to have lots of small quakes throughout the year. I think I recall an earthquake expert explaining that the San Andreas fault moves pretty freely in this part of Cali, but tends to stick in other places.

olddad56

(5,732 posts)
23. I've lived in California my entire 64 years.
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 01:04 PM
Oct 2012

felt the ground move a few times, but never been close enough to the epicenter of a quake to experience any damage in my area. Lived through a very scary flood in 1955. Experienced a big destructive earthquake in Yellowstone park in Montana in 1962.

I don't even worry about earthquakes.

cynannmarie

(113 posts)
24. it shook a lot in Monterey
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 01:19 PM
Oct 2012

Pretty significant shaking over what seemed like a long one-- and a very loud rumble sound. Things fell off my cabinet by the bed. I was in SF during the Loma Prieta and this one was the strongest one I remember since then--although I lived out of state for some years in the 90s before returned about 10 years ago. Our house is only a few years old and seismic engineering required us to install many 30 foot long steel rods into bedrock in the foundation work, so I am curious to learn how our house fared to older ones pre-seismic code. We were sitting on the sofa, but definitely considered moving for cover with this one. Didn't though--it always takes a few moments before you process what is really happening.

Wernothelpless

(410 posts)
32. STRONG VANUATU QUAKE FOLLOWED BY MODERATE EARTHQUAKES IN ICELAND AND CALIFORNIA
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 03:12 PM
Oct 2012

EARTHQUAKE SUMMARY FOR OCTOBER 20, 2012

An earthquake of M 6.5-6.6 rattled the region of Vanuatu today but there were no reported damages or casualties and not tsunami was observed or expected. The quake hit northwest of Port Vila. An ionospheric anomaly (TEC) had been identified in the general Vanuatu region beginning on October 19 and may have been a precursor to this earthquake. This is the strongest earthquake in northern Vanuatu since an M 7.1 on May 27, 2010. It may be that this earthquake is a regional response to a strong solar flare of M9.0 which occurred about five hours earlier. This is the strongest solar flare since an X1.4 on July 12 more than three months ago. Northern Vanuatu lies 10-15 degrees south of the geomagnetic equator in a region where ionospheric triggering of seismicity is most likely. The only moderate earthquake in the region in the past two months occurred on October 15 with M 5.3. The last strong earthquake to hit northern Vanuatu was an M 6.3 on July 6. This earthquake coincided with one of two X-class solar flares which have occurred in the past six months, the other being the one on July 12. We noted this coincidence in the July 7 summary. Forecast 69607 had expected this area of Vanuatu to be active with a possibly large event around October 19.

http://earthquakesummary.info/

Interesting speculation on a solar flare ...

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
40. I love how you minimize the significance of the earthquake
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 04:32 PM
Oct 2012

then post completely unproven theories about weather and solar flares as their cause.

i mean this with all due respect.

Wernothelpless

(410 posts)
48. I believe I referred to it as an "interesting speculation" .. not fact ...
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 09:55 AM
Oct 2012

Discussing possibilities or a theory is part of having a discussion ...

Unless, of course, one is surrounded by a gang of rabid rats who, having nothing else to eat, begin to eat their own ... this is an absurd survival instinct which seems to have run amok ... perhaps the last gasp of a faux liberal clique ... congratulations, your evolution is complete ...

AntiFascist

(12,792 posts)
43. Interesting webpage...
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 07:52 PM
Oct 2012

Do you know who is responsible for this research?

Also, I wonder what would cause the boom that some people report hearing before or during the quake?

AntiFascist

(12,792 posts)
45. Here's what the NOAA has to say about solar flares...
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 09:31 PM
Oct 2012

Last edited Sun Oct 21, 2012, 10:28 PM - Edit history (1)

http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/info/FAQ-earth.html

2. Is there a relationship between solar events and earthquakes?

An international meeting of scientists was convened in London from November 7 to 8, 1996, on the subject of relationships of earthquakes to other phenomena for prediction purposes. Papers of that meeting appeared in the Geophysical Journal International, vol. 131, pgs. 413 to 533, 1997. (Perhaps you should read those articles and the summary by Geller). The consensus of the meeting was that prediction was not possible. As Main points out in Nature (vol 385, pg 19-20, 1997) "Modern theories of earthquakes hold that they are critical, or self-organized critical, phenomena, implying a system maintained permanently on the edge of chaos, with an inherently random element and avalanche dynamics with strong sensitivity to small stress perturbations."

Geller, a prominent seismologist at the University of Tokyo who continues to research the possible earthquake relationships to other natural phenomena, reports "The chaotic, highly nonlinear nature of the earthquake source process makes prediction and inherently unrealizable goal." If you believe that you have some solid firsthand evidence, perhaps you should write to Geller to bring yourself up-to-date on this subject (Dr. Robert, Dept. of Earth and Planetary Physics, Graduate School of Science, Tokyo University, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033 JAPAN).

I have found no evidence of a significant relationship between the phenomena you talk about. Perhaps you should read my last book, "Introduction to Geomagnetic Fields" (Cambridge University Press, 1997) which discusses the realistic relationships of the solar activity to processes on Earth. --Wallace H. Campbell, whc@ngdc.noaa.gov


On the other hand, there may be a correlation between major earthquakes and lunar cycles. This would make sense because when the sun and moon are on opposite sides of the Earth then the crust is deformed the greatest amount.
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»5.3 earthquake jolts Cent...