Obama Camp Condemns 2nd Romney Sen. Ad Backing Candidate W/ Controversial Position On Rape, Abortion
Source: TPM
BOSTON A day after Mitt Romney went on the air with only his second ad backing a Senate candidate, the Obama campaign is again saying his decision shows he stands with the extreme right when it comes to abortion rights.
Romney took flak from womens groups, Democrats and Team Obama when he stood by Richard Mourdock in Indiana following that Senate nominees comments about rape, conception and Gods will. Now it seems hes in the same boat again after cutting an ad for North Dakota Rep. Rick Berg (R), who as a state legislator voted for a bill that would have made getting an abortion a class AA felony, meaning rape and incest victims caught getting one would be subject to a sentence of life behind bars.
Bergs 2007 vote in the state legislature for H.B. 1489 has been part of the national coverage of the North Dakota Senate race since September, when it popped up in the fallout after Rep. Todd Akins (R) legitimate rape comments in the Missouri Senate fight. But Romneys decision to cut an ad for Berg that appeared on Saturday put the North Dakotans vote back in the national spotlight.
-snip-
Voters should take note that at the same time Mitt Romney is promising bipartisanship on the campaign trail, hes taping ads for candidates like Richard Mourdock and Rick Berg, who believes that rape victims who get abortions should face life imprisonment, Lis Smith, a spokesperson for the Obama campaign, said in a statement. Purposefully building an even more divisive and extreme Republican Party in Washington only means more partisanship and a bigger rubber stamp for the Tea Party agenda.
-snip-
Read more: http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/11/mitt-romney-rick-berg-ad-obama-condemn.php
itsrobert
(14,157 posts)So they are going to try to spend whatever capital they have trying to save republicans.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)Look at what is happening in ND with Heidi Heitkamp running over Rick Berg. And ND is much redder than IN.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)only thing I need to know is why in the hell did all these idiot misogynistic/racist tea bagger rethug extremists get voted into office. A majority voted them in, didn't they? Why????? The reactionary attitude displayed by amerikkkans to voice their displeasure over a black POTUS, gender equality, sexual orientation equality is really quite stupid and shows an amazing ignorance and backwardness. SAD!!!! 21st century my ass. More like 18th-19 century amerikkka.