Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Newsjock

(11,733 posts)
Sun Nov 4, 2012, 10:08 PM Nov 2012

Arizona group ordered (again) to release records (and refuses)

Source: San Francisco Chronicle

The state Supreme Court issued an order Sunday to allow California's political watchdog to identify contributors to an Arizona group's last-minute infusion of $11 million to the campaigns opposing Gov. Jerry Brown's tax initiative and supporting an antiunion measure on Tuesday's ballot.

But the Arizona group declined to turn over its records by the court's 4 p.m. deadline and told a state lawyer it was planning to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, said Ann Ravel, chairwoman of the state Fair Political Practices Commission.

The refusal reduced the likelihood that the donors will be publicly identified before Tuesday, when the California ballot will include Prop. 30, Brown's measure to increase income and sales taxes to fund schools and other programs, and Prop. 32, which would prohibit unions from spending payroll-deducted dues on political campaigns.

An Arizona nonprofit called Americans for Responsible Leadership gave $11 million on Oct. 15 to a California committee that opposes Prop. 30 and supports Prop. 32. The nonprofit did not identify its contributors and appealed a Sacramento judge's ruling last week ordering it to disclose its records to the FPPC.

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/Arizona-group-ordered-to-release-records-4007780.php

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Arizona group ordered (again) to release records (and refuses) (Original Post) Newsjock Nov 2012 OP
Hold them in contempt. blackspade Nov 2012 #1
I'm sure they'll be more compliant in a few days.. nt kerouac2 Nov 2012 #2
If U.S. Supreme Court rethinks Citizen United because of this case, kiranon Nov 2012 #3
No Chance of That AndyTiedye Nov 2012 #7
they already had that chance with Montana booley Nov 2012 #9
The judge needs to recognize they are in contempt and order the immediate jailing byeya Nov 2012 #4
I'm sure lsewpershad Nov 2012 #5
And I am sure that you are 100% correct. byeya Nov 2012 #6
Umm... Didn't they do so yesterday? armodem08 Nov 2012 #8

kiranon

(1,727 posts)
3. If U.S. Supreme Court rethinks Citizen United because of this case,
Sun Nov 4, 2012, 11:03 PM
Nov 2012

it may be worth it. There is a danger in the donors taking this case to the U.S. Supreme Court if Citizens United is retooled as it very well may be given the disaster this decision has caused and its disdain by most legal scholars and citizens.

AndyTiedye

(23,500 posts)
7. No Chance of That
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 12:07 PM
Nov 2012

"Citizens United" is very very important to them. The Supreme Court will never reconsider it as long as the Felonious Five are on it.

booley

(3,855 posts)
9. they already had that chance with Montana
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 02:16 PM
Nov 2012

Montana made the case that because of citizens United there was outright corruption of the process

The cons on the bench didn't care

 

byeya

(2,842 posts)
4. The judge needs to recognize they are in contempt and order the immediate jailing
Mon Nov 5, 2012, 09:13 AM
Nov 2012

of the parties ordered to release the papers. Simple and routine unless the judge allows him/herself to be bullied.

lsewpershad

(2,620 posts)
5. I'm sure
Mon Nov 5, 2012, 12:26 PM
Nov 2012

if this order were issued against an average citizen , pooror minority, people would hve been hauled off to jail already.

armodem08

(203 posts)
8. Umm... Didn't they do so yesterday?
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 12:41 PM
Nov 2012
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-secret-donors-20121106,0,1877555.story

"The money started with the Virginia-based Americans for Job Security and was transferred to a group called the Center to Protect Patient Rights. Over the course of a few days in October it was sent to the Arizona group, Americans for Responsible Leadership, and then transferred again to California."

It was pass-through money from a conservative SuperPAC.

On edit:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014291392
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Arizona group ordered (ag...