Arizona group ordered (again) to release records (and refuses)
Source: San Francisco Chronicle
The state Supreme Court issued an order Sunday to allow California's political watchdog to identify contributors to an Arizona group's last-minute infusion of $11 million to the campaigns opposing Gov. Jerry Brown's tax initiative and supporting an antiunion measure on Tuesday's ballot.
But the Arizona group declined to turn over its records by the court's 4 p.m. deadline and told a state lawyer it was planning to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, said Ann Ravel, chairwoman of the state Fair Political Practices Commission.
The refusal reduced the likelihood that the donors will be publicly identified before Tuesday, when the California ballot will include Prop. 30, Brown's measure to increase income and sales taxes to fund schools and other programs, and Prop. 32, which would prohibit unions from spending payroll-deducted dues on political campaigns.
An Arizona nonprofit called Americans for Responsible Leadership gave $11 million on Oct. 15 to a California committee that opposes Prop. 30 and supports Prop. 32. The nonprofit did not identify its contributors and appealed a Sacramento judge's ruling last week ordering it to disclose its records to the FPPC.
Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/Arizona-group-ordered-to-release-records-4007780.php
blackspade
(10,056 posts)And arrest them.
kerouac2
(449 posts)kiranon
(1,727 posts)it may be worth it. There is a danger in the donors taking this case to the U.S. Supreme Court if Citizens United is retooled as it very well may be given the disaster this decision has caused and its disdain by most legal scholars and citizens.
AndyTiedye
(23,500 posts)"Citizens United" is very very important to them. The Supreme Court will never reconsider it as long as the Felonious Five are on it.
booley
(3,855 posts)Montana made the case that because of citizens United there was outright corruption of the process
The cons on the bench didn't care
byeya
(2,842 posts)of the parties ordered to release the papers. Simple and routine unless the judge allows him/herself to be bullied.
if this order were issued against an average citizen , pooror minority, people would hve been hauled off to jail already.
byeya
(2,842 posts)armodem08
(203 posts)"The money started with the Virginia-based Americans for Job Security and was transferred to a group called the Center to Protect Patient Rights. Over the course of a few days in October it was sent to the Arizona group, Americans for Responsible Leadership, and then transferred again to California."
It was pass-through money from a conservative SuperPAC.
On edit:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014291392