Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dooner

(1,217 posts)
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 11:16 AM Nov 2012

Forbes: The Technological Foundations Of Today's Election Are Shaky, Especially In Ohio

Source: Forbes

The Secretary of State’s office has been evasive and contradictory in response to questions about the minor seeming change that involved converting results from xml to csv format. Apparently, by calling the software “experimental,” Husted was attempting to avoid any approval, review or testing of the new software. But as the federal Elections Assistance Commission titled a memo back in February , “Software and Firmware modifications are not de minimis changes.”

Denis Campbell at the UK Progressive, has written a series of posts based on the statistical analysis of a former NSA analyst that show an inexplicable but recurrent statistical anomaly. Draw your own conclusions, but this retired analyst, Michael Duniho, has demonstrated “mathematics [that] showed changes in actual raw voting data that had no statistical correlation other than programmable computer fraud. This computer fraud resulted in votes being flipped from Democrat to Republican in every federal, senatorial, congressional and gubernatorial election since 2008 (thus far) and in the 2012 primary contests from other Republicans to Mitt Romney.” He claims to prove that there is an unexplained, and systemic, shift in favor of Republicans in the larger districts by a factor of 10%.



Read more: http://www.forbes.com/sites/anthonykosner/2012/11/06/the-technological-foundations-of-todays-election-are-shaky-especially-in-ohio/



Good to see this topic in more mainstream publications. We have perhaps learned a little something since previous elections. Hopefully not too little too late.
23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Forbes: The Technological Foundations Of Today's Election Are Shaky, Especially In Ohio (Original Post) dooner Nov 2012 OP
Forbes is not known as a conspiracy rag flamingdem Nov 2012 #1
D'oh Berlum Nov 2012 #2
Glad this ws published prior to the votes are tallied Tom Rinaldo Nov 2012 #3
Those Bastards! sheshe2 Nov 2012 #4
A straight forward solution to this would be to have the machines print out the ballot for the voter xtraxritical Nov 2012 #5
Exactly. TPaine7 Nov 2012 #8
That Opens It Up for Coercion by Employers AndyTiedye Nov 2012 #19
That is higly illegal now and will continue to be. xtraxritical Nov 2012 #20
IOKIYAR AndyTiedye Nov 2012 #21
Here's a read... BouzoukiKing Nov 2012 #13
Husted has a long trail of Chaos... inamatteroftime Nov 2012 #6
K&R KeepItReal Nov 2012 #7
Forbes Also Reported on the Ownership of the Hart Intercivic Voting Machinez AndyTiedye Nov 2012 #9
and a great big fuck you to little-debbie (wasserman) who says vote stealing and election rigging leftyohiolib Nov 2012 #10
amazing that they got away with stealing elections for a decade and still this is going on! BREMPRO Nov 2012 #11
This will not stop until sulphurdunn Nov 2012 #12
Now is not a good time to rush a software patch Thav Nov 2012 #14
if we are to have e voting then... SHRED Nov 2012 #15
Absolutely FiveGoodMen Nov 2012 #17
Forbes! Awesome. nilram Nov 2012 #16
If you rebuff any attempts to mess with software, they'll eventually resort to hardware cprise Nov 2012 #18
It is good that the truth is finally coming out... GetTheRightVote Nov 2012 #22
Maybe we can use RW disappointment over Ohio caraher Nov 2012 #23

Berlum

(7,044 posts)
2. D'oh
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 11:23 AM
Nov 2012

Only those Deep In Sleep can fail to see all that the Republicans have done to undermine the integrity of American democracy.

Thanks for posting. Glad to see that some in the corporate media are coming out of their trance.

Tom Rinaldo

(22,913 posts)
3. Glad this ws published prior to the votes are tallied
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 11:29 AM
Nov 2012

This is a useful "the world is watching" warning.

When the dust clears from this election, it is time for a sustained movment to fight the potential for evoting fraud. Doesn't matter if you believe it is happening or not, it is obvious that hacking can happen. Too many Democrats are afraid of raising this prior to an election - claiming it discourages voter turn out. I don't accept that argument but we can avoid even having to have it if we begin tackling this issue seriously starting tomorrow. Are we really going to wait another 23 months and then start up this anciety cycle again then when it is too late to do anything other than to tell activists to stay quiet?

 

xtraxritical

(3,576 posts)
5. A straight forward solution to this would be to have the machines print out the ballot for the voter
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 11:50 AM
Nov 2012

The ballot could then be dropped in a locked collection box on the way out after the voter tears off his/her's numbered receipt. It provides a natural check on the machines and creates an easily followed audit trail. As Ross Perot says "it's that simple".

AndyTiedye

(23,500 posts)
19. That Opens It Up for Coercion by Employers
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 08:38 PM
Nov 2012

Employers all over the country are threatening their employees with firing if Obama wins.
If the voter can verify his vote later, his employer can force him to prove he voted for Robme.
If they can, they will.

AndyTiedye

(23,500 posts)
21. IOKIYAR
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 09:09 PM
Nov 2012

"Law? What do I care about the law? Hain't I got the power?"

Cornelius Vanderbilt, and many other employers.

AndyTiedye

(23,500 posts)
9. Forbes Also Reported on the Ownership of the Hart Intercivic Voting Machinez
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 12:14 PM
Nov 2012

by an entity controlled by the Romney family.

Interesting that these things are being reported by Forbes.

Robme is so crooked that even they are afraid of him.

 

leftyohiolib

(5,917 posts)
10. and a great big fuck you to little-debbie (wasserman) who says vote stealing and election rigging
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 12:15 PM
Nov 2012

are nothing more than conspiracy theories

BREMPRO

(2,331 posts)
11. amazing that they got away with stealing elections for a decade and still this is going on!
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 12:25 PM
Nov 2012

clearly the R sec of state has no interest in transparency or accountablility, but seriously can someone catch these dudes who deliberately reprogram voting machines to shift votes?? how hard can it be to get a copy of this software and test it?? any DUers know of clear evidence of software being tested and confirmed for actual DELIBERATE vote shifting during an election?

 

sulphurdunn

(6,891 posts)
12. This will not stop until
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 01:02 PM
Nov 2012

the the risk of going to prison is greater than the benefit of rigging an election.

Thav

(946 posts)
14. Now is not a good time to rush a software patch
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 01:34 PM
Nov 2012

It's just too suspicious, especially when it hasn't gone through due dilligence.

Also, if the patch is simply converting output of a report from xml to csv, I'd have told the SoS to deal with it and we'll change it for the next election.

And if that's ALL the patch does, then why isn't the SoS being more open about it? That kind of change is quite benign. My guess is there's more to the patch that the SoS doesn't want public.

 

SHRED

(28,136 posts)
15. if we are to have e voting then...
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 01:51 PM
Nov 2012

...it is imperative the machines are publicly owned and open source coded.

FiveGoodMen

(20,018 posts)
17. Absolutely
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 03:28 PM
Nov 2012

Nothing else should have ever been considered.

It took a fair amount of corruption just to get us where we already are.

cprise

(8,445 posts)
18. If you rebuff any attempts to mess with software, they'll eventually resort to hardware
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 03:59 PM
Nov 2012

If they put fraud logic in the microchips themselves, then it may be impossible to find the fraud.

Focusing on software as the crux of the problem is a red herring. The problem is that the mechanics of voting has to be subject to easy auditing -- soup to nuts -- requiring at most only a few hours of training for auditors. Computerized voting cannot conceivably meet a standard like that: Every logic gate in silicon would have to be examined, and add every scrap of firmware on top of that. That is impossible. Not even the NSA could do such a thing to the simplest videogame console.

Computerized voting is Blackbox Voting. The only reason computers are trusted for financial transactions is because finance has all parties cognizant of who is involved with which transactions, and those parties get receipts and statements, so the process has constant easy verification. Secret ballots are nothing like this.

If you want voting to be 'computerized', then feed the paper ballots into a scanner!

GetTheRightVote

(5,287 posts)
22. It is good that the truth is finally coming out...
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 01:45 AM
Nov 2012

but it still needs to be handled as well. The stealing of our elections must end, they would have taken this one too except to many of us got out to vote. This problem must be eliminated completely...

caraher

(6,278 posts)
23. Maybe we can use RW disappointment over Ohio
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 02:23 AM
Nov 2012

to help bring about a real fix to our voting system. Yes, we know Obama did not steal Ohio (and exactly who may have tried!), but I think we might be able to get everyone to agree that both sides deserve to know the system is reliable and the process transparent.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Forbes: The Technological...