Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

trailmonkee

(2,681 posts)
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 02:37 PM Nov 2012

Chris Christie Slams 'Know-Nothing, Disgruntled' Mitt Romney Staffers

Source: huffington post

On Monday night, The Huffington Post's Jon Ward reported that New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie turned down a request by GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney to appear with him at a rally on Sunday night.

Christie responded to the report during a press conference on Tuesday, saying that Romney had called him last Sunday to get an update on the situation as Hurricane Sandy headed toward New Jersey. Listen to the audio, courtesy of Reuters' Matthew Keys: http://snd.sc/PUHDuH

"I told Governor Romney at that time that if the storm landed as predicted that it was going to be catastrophic to New Jersey and unprecedented," Christie said. "I said to him, 'Listen, Mitt, if this storm hits the way I think it's going to, I'm off the campaign trail from here to Election Day.' And he said to me, 'Chris, of course. That's what you have to do. Do your job, don't worry about me. I'll take care of things.' So all this other noise, I think, is coming from know-nothing, disgruntled Romney staffers who, you know, don't like the fact that I said nice things about the President of the United States. Well, that's too bad for them."

"He told me last Sunday night that he expected no other political travel or help from me over the course of the remaining time between then and the election, if in fact the storm hit the way it was projected," Christie continued. "If it missed us, I would have been happy to go out on the road and help him. But it didn't."



Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/06/chris-christie-mitt-romney_n_2082634.html?1352223695

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
1. Those nasty, rabid Republicans better be careful...
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 02:42 PM
Nov 2012

...because if you start barking at the wrong people--people who are on your side--they can turn on you real fast.

Acting like "children of the corn" won't score you any points with Chris Christie.

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
6. I'm liking this new Chris Christie a bit.
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 02:59 PM
Nov 2012

Well, he's actually DOING HIS JOB.


Very un-republican of him! ( I mean just look at the House & Senate)

calimary

(81,318 posts)
8. NOPE. Not me. NOT wooed. NOT impressed. NOT fooled. NOT lulled. chris christie is gonna have to do
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 03:05 PM
Nov 2012

Last edited Tue Nov 6, 2012, 03:51 PM - Edit history (1)

MUCH better than that to win this heart of mine. He still seems to have his "r" proudly tattooed over his, so I know full well which way he's gonna bend. He doesn't fool me for a nanosecond.

There is no "new" chris christie. He's still one of the bad guys as far as I'm concerned - one of the worst kind: a loutish, obnoxious, cold-hearted, calculating, bullying bad guy. He can't give that kind of CONvention speech and then turn around and expect me to forget everything just because he was well-behaved and respectful to the President for a day or two. He's just damned lucky that President Obama is a classy guy and doesn't hold grudges or keep score (like I do!). Although I'd be helping him for the sake of the PEOPLE OF NEW JERSEY, and NOT him.

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
9. Totally understand and get that point of view.
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 03:07 PM
Nov 2012
Obviously, nobody should ever forget that he is Republican, or even in fantasyland if he changed parties, that he stood with Republicans on important issues.

calimary

(81,318 posts)
11. Yeah, I hate to be rigid on stuff like this, but that's where I am. I believe republi-CONS are evil.
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 04:53 PM
Nov 2012

The very proof of it is playing out today with all the voting-booth shenanigans going on. I'm sure I don't pay as close attention as many here do, but I know what I've seen, read, heard, and studied. No one can convince me that Democrats of any sort are behind this voter suppression and the dirty tricks - especially from that Ohio secretary of state! Who is, for the record, a republi-CON.

I'm sorry, but for all I've seen in my 59 years, this is the conclusion I keep tripping over - regardless where I turn, step, or wander. republi-CONS are evil. Their agenda is evil. What they want to do is evil. What they envision for this country is cock-eyed, unrealistic, selfish, greedy, hideously unfair, and, boiled down, just plain evil. If a candidate has an "r" by his or her name, he or she is automatically suspect, in my eyes. Civilians who vote "r" - are usually led by some utopian fantasy of everybody booting up by themselves and turning themselves into billionaires within four or five months. They're either complacent, ill-informed, or naive. BUT WHEN YOU DECIDE TO RUN FOR PUBLIC OFFICE, AND ATTEMPT TO HAVE A HAND IN PUBLIC POLICY, then you're not a non-combatant anymore. And your motives and leanings and priorities and the people you hang with and with whom you surround yourself - ALL become deserving of public scrutiny. You have to own those motives, leanings, priorities, and cronies. And the public deserves to know the who, what, where, when, how, and ESPECIALLY why. 'Cause the PUBLIC will be signing your paycheck if you win.

And truly, I look at the issues.
Who wants spending - where, why, and on what?
Who wants spending cuts - where, why, and on what?
Who wants taxes cut - where, why, and on what/whom?
Who wants taxes raised - where, why, and on what/whom?
Who believes in expanding rights and who thinks those rights should be curtailed, or even ended altogether?
Whose behavior indicates they're a true Christian, if that's what they loudly claim they are?
Who takes science seriously and who rejects evolution and the reality of climate change, and yes, HUMAN-CAUSED climate change?
Who's for "we're all in this together" versus "I Got Mine, F-U?" (This one applies nationally AND internationally.)
Whose first instinct is to game the system, and who's more focused on leveling the playing field? Who prefers "how can I get around...?" to "how can I get along?"
Who's the adult in the room and who's the spoiled, selfish, greedy, tantrum-throwing brat-child?
and then
Who's kind and who's not?
Who's mean or mean-spirited and who's not?
Who's a liar and who's not?
Who apologizes and who doesn't?
and then
Who's their daddy? Where are they getting their money? And with whom are they surrounding themselves?

Well, that's my checklist and on EVERY issue I care about, the Dems come out on the side I'm on, myself. The republi-CONS are invariably on the other side. I can't really think of one item on the above list where I'm on the GOP side. I believe "much-blessed, much-obligated." They don't. They believe "much-blessed. So?" It's not the way I was brought up. It gets into the whole God and Jesus thing for me as well. The GOP just seems to be anathema to everything I believe in and hold dear, item after item on the list. They haven't passed one! Failed 'em ALL! And that kind of individual, at the end of my test, is in NO way fit to hold public office, and CERTAINLY doesn't deserve to be President, much less even be so presumptive and arrogant as to run for it!

And so far, chris christie has yet to pass the test. I see what political trough he heads for when it's feeding time. And he knows he's got to get through his own reelection soon enough, in a blue state, so he knows he better behave around Barack Obama now that the hurricane's come through. But he's a politician. And they are Machiavelli in the flesh.

And of those folks I know - if I know they're "r," then I'm afraid it DOES color my opinion of them. And not in a good way. I don't see ANY reason on earth to vote republi-CON. It just makes no sense to me, on any front.

I don't trust christie as far as I could throw my house. I don't even trust him as far as I might be able to throw him! Same with all republi-CONS. I regard them ALL with suspicion until they prove there's no longer a reason to do so. Their actions are suspect because their motives are suspect. And their motives are suspect because their agenda is suspect.

Hekate

(90,714 posts)
10. I think this IS the real Chris Christie
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 03:10 PM
Nov 2012

Next week he'll say something we don't like at all.

However, the charm of the guy is that he speaks his mind, and heart, and obviously gut. He doesn't give off those oily calculating vibes we get from most other politicians.

Quantess

(27,630 posts)
5. Christie has his priorities.
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 02:58 PM
Nov 2012

Who can blame him for putting the local disaster ahead of campaigning for that self-centered creep Romney?

calimary

(81,318 posts)
12. Well, it will truly be popcorn time after wrongney presumably loses.
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 05:08 PM
Nov 2012

The blamestorm will begin and christie will probably be the goat. They'll come back around to him if they feel they have to (todd akin anyone?) but he'll be damaged goods for sure if they decide he's the scapegoat for wrongney's defeat. That will likely be spearheaded by ryan's people looking to excuse him from any blame, and perhaps to hobble ryan's most likely competition for 2016.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Chris Christie Slams 'Kno...