Monsanto Throws GMO Victory Party in California
Source: Common Dreams
November 7, 2012
8:22 AM
Monsanto Throws GMO Victory
Party in California
$46 Million Advertising Blitz Convinces Citizens to Vote "Against Own Interests"
SACRAMENTO, CA - November 7 - After a deluge of allegedly misleading advertisements paid for in large part by pesticide and biotechnology corporations, California voters defeated Proposition 37, which would have given them the rightto-know whether the foods they buy at the grocery store contain genetically engineered ingredients (GMOs).
With 95% of the vote counted, according to the California Secretary of State's office, the proposal was defeated 53-47%.
"Genetically engineered foods found on market shelves have most commonly been altered in a lab to either be resistant to being sprayed by large amounts of toxic herbicides, or to produce, internally, their own insecticide," explains Mark A. Kastel, Codirector of The Cornucopia Institute.
"Corporations that produce both the genetically engineered crops and their designer pesticides, in concert with the multi-billion-dollar food manufacturers that use these ingredients, fought this measure tooth and nail, throwing $46 million at the effort that would have required food manufacturers to include informational labeling on GMO content on their packaging," Kastel added.
~snip~
"Had we seen the same level of enthusiasm for consumers right-to-know from Whole Foods as we saw against the right-to-know from Monsanto, the playing field would have been more level, and the misleading information spewed by giant corporate agribusinesses would quite possibly not have prevailed on election day, said Kastel. "Meaningful participation from Whole Foods could have been a game changer."
Read more: http://www.commondreams.org/newswire/2012/11/07-19
abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)pam4water
(2,916 posts)bunnies
(15,859 posts)And the rest of New England. Just like marriage equality.
condoleeza
(814 posts)there is a petition circulating to get Obama to make this National and Oregon and Washington and many other States are fighting for this as well.
It is imperative that we put all the pressure we can on Obama now to replace Tom Vilsack and Michael Taylor. Geitner is on his way out, these other 2 are the other major disappointments from his first 4 years. Please download the poster on this link and spread it around. Stop buying products from the companies who let Monsanto get away with this and support those who fought it. [link:http://www.commondreams.org/newswire/2012/11/07-19|
roody
(10,849 posts)eating GMOs.
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)savannah43
(575 posts)Put Monsanto and those using their Frankenfood out of business. Lists of what food brands to avoid are all over the 'net. If the label doesn't say that the product is certified organic, don't buy it.
roody
(10,849 posts)siligut
(12,272 posts)I remember reading that even Orville Redenbachers was GMO. Surprised me because supposedly it was specially bred to be bigger and better.
Tumbulu
(6,292 posts)and they will be regulated and labeled, or they will go away.
Judi Lynn
(160,601 posts)GMO labeling efforts change course after California defeat
By Carey Gillam and Lisa Baertlein
Wed Nov 7, 2012 4:13pm EST
(Reuters) - The failure on Tuesday of a California ballot initiative that would have mandated labeling of genetically modified foods is not a death knell for those seeking nationwide labeling, U.S. labeling proponents said.
President Barack Obama's re-election could be a boost, as he is seen, in general terms, as being supportive of labeling. Still, efforts to force change at a federal level could face an uphill climb.
"The federal effort is a monumental task without a state victory somewhere," said Michele Simon, a public health attorney from California.
New state labeling initiatives are planned for Washington state and Oregon. Beyond that, the action now shifts to Washington, D.C. and efforts to force change at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, which has primary regulatory oversight for food and food additives.
More:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/11/07/us-usa-campaign-gmo-labeling-idUSBRE8A62D320121107?rpc=401&feedType=RSS&feedName=domesticNews&rpc=401
Cha
(297,553 posts)we'll WIN the right to see those GMO on food products.. Like we're seeing warnings on cigarette packs that people still smoke. At least they're freaking warned.
Thanks for this update, Judi Lynn!
savannah43
(575 posts)level, too. What would help is a movement in each state demanding that GMO's be outlawed entirely. Maybe if that is demanded by citizens, the proponents of GMO's wouldn't be so reluctant to at least label them.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)... has put Monsanto's Man in charge of the Department of Agriculture,
and a Monsanto Lobbyist in charge of the FDA.
Google: "Vilsack & Monsanto.
Google: "Michael Taylor & Monsanto"
As far as I can tell NOBODY with a commitment to Natural, Healthy, Foods or Organic Farming was given a position of power in the current Department of Agriculture or the FDA.
You will know them by their WORKS,
not by their rhetoric, promises, or excuses.
[font size=5 color=green]Solidarity99![/font][font size=2 color=green]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------[/center]
Cleita
(75,480 posts)factor here in CA. We are such a gigantic agricultural state and a lot of people don't realize this. They also don't realize that much of that agricultural is controlled by huge corporations, not single family farmers.
roody
(10,849 posts)Cleita
(75,480 posts)loudsue
(14,087 posts)Someone who is on the side of the people and the environment.
RussBLib
(9,034 posts)We need to keep trying on this one. Just goes to show, big money and big lies can SOMETIMES be enough to brainwash the people.
Mojorabbit
(16,020 posts)Was it some sort of scare campaign? It seems such a no brainer.
SunSeeker
(51,662 posts)In other words, lies. And the pro 37 campaign did not have the money to counter them. This is one example of a Citizens United casualty from last night.
bamacrat
(3,867 posts)It seems like anything that should be a given to pass there gets defeated because the opposition outspends the proponents. I guess I have a false idea of California. Gay Marriage, GMO labeling, Legal Weed, all outspent and defeated..
Cleita
(75,480 posts)Democratic candidate, don't know how to wade through the murkier propositions, many of those written with opaque and misleading language. Add massive misleading ads and sadly, most often usually liberal voters will vote for the Republican backed proposition. This is one of those instances.
JRLeft
(7,010 posts)Cha
(297,553 posts)has always been first in the Nation for leading in Healthy Food. That's my personal observation since the '70s.
Bummer.. I only shop at Natural Food stores who don't sell those products but it would be really nice for people to know what they're buying.
otohara
(24,135 posts)Starting with Reagan, Arnold...no pot, no gay marriage and now this?
olddad56
(5,732 posts)Cleita
(75,480 posts)information campaign was backed by Monsanto and Dow chemical, but people are still so naive that they believe those evil companies have their best interests at heart. It's so discouraging.
Cha
(297,553 posts)at making people think they have their best interests at heart.
Some aren't so fooled..like the ones who have lawsuits against Pioneer here on Kaua'i.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)fighting this will all their might.
roody
(10,849 posts)Cleita
(75,480 posts)condoleeza
(814 posts)limpyhobbler
(8,244 posts)Cleita
(75,480 posts)Knocking on doors, standing on soap boxes in the park. I don't know exactly what but I feel only people power, like an Occupy Movement will get the lies exposed. Or, maybe I'm engaging in wishful thinking.
limpyhobbler
(8,244 posts)AsahinaKimi
(20,776 posts)California Voters must not have paid too close of attention to..
Fantasy scenario:.. Monsanto people throw their plush high society party..an unknown some one from the umbrella corporation spritzes their maraschino cherries with a special formula.
Party goers fall over in agony and become ZOMBIES.... Zombies attack and kill the Monsanto department heads...turning them into Zombies...
ALICE SHOWS UP!
Let the games begin!
Cleita
(75,480 posts)People believed the misleading advertising. They pulled the same tactic about Prop. 13 saying passing it would save old people from losing their homes. We have been suffering draconian losses from that ever since then, from the dismantling our free university education system to institutionalized homelessness. What I'm saying is they got a lot of the liberal votes from misinformed Democrats. It never would have passed otherwise. I'm kinda pissed with our CA DNC for not fighting this harder.
bunnies
(15,859 posts)Just SICK. Yeah, hey, whatever, feed me whatever garbage you want! Why should you have to tell me about it? So what if the shit causes cancer in lab animals!
olddad56
(5,732 posts)Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)Tumbulu
(6,292 posts)to require a regulatory system, they thought labeling would kill their market....they made a big mistake. A few real tests and they will be out of business entirely.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Some supporters built up passage of Proposition 37 as "a shot heard 'round the world" to bring about wider food-system reform. Many proponents of the measure saw it as an opportunity to spark a national referendum as well as challenge what some call "Franken-food" and the use of only a few seed types owned by a small number of giant companies, said Tom Philpott in Mother Jones:
"Make no mistake, Prop. 37 was the food-system equivalent to a lunge at the king. No fewer than two massive sectors of the established food economy saw it as a threat: the GMO seed/agrichemical industry, led by giant companies Monsanto, DuPont, Dow, and Bayer; and the food-processing/junk-food industries who transform GMO crops into profitable products, led by Kraft, Nestle, Coca-Cola, and their ilk. Collectively, these companies represent billions in annual profits; and they perceived a material threat to their bottom lines in the labeling requirement, as evidenced by the gusher of cash they poured into defeating it."
http://www.latimes.com/features/food/dailydish/la-dd-proposition-37-food-movement-20121107,0,207878.story
Lying in the California voter guide: The No campaign listed four organizations in the official state document mailed to voters as concluding that biotech foods are safe. One of them, the American Council on Science and Health, is a notorious industry front group that only sounds legit. Another, the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, actually has no position and complained about being listed. (I was attending the groups annual meeting when this came to light and promptly notified the Yes campaign, but the damage was already done.) The other two organizations, the National Academy of Sciences and the World Health Organization, in fact have more nuanced positions on GMOs than just safe.
Misuse of a federal seal and quoting the Food and Drug Administration: This one caused even my jaded draw to drop. In a mailer sent to California voters, the No campaign printed the following text along side the FDA logo: The US Food and Drug Administration says a labeling policy like Prop 37 would be inherently misleading. That is exactly how they wrote it, with the incorrectly-placed quotation marks. How can a $45 million campaign make a mistake like that? They cant, its deliberately confusing. It also may even be a violation of criminal law to use a federal seal in this manner. I am told that some California voters were fooled into thinking FDA opposed the measure. Of course, that was the idea.
Misrepresenting academic affiliation: More than once, the No campaign gave the false impression that its go-to expert Henry Miller was a professor at Stanford University, in violation the schools own policy. (In fact, hes with the Hoover Institute, housed on the Stanford campus.) Only when Stanford complained did the No campaign edit the TV ad, but many already saw it, and then they repeated the lie in a mailer.
Deploying unfounded scare tactics: I fully expected the No side to use distracting arguments to scare voters while ignoring the merits of issue. But they took this common industry strategy to new heights, making wild claims about higher food prices, shakedown lawsuits, and special interest exemptions. While each of these claims is easily debunked, being outspent on ad dollars makes it hard to compete, especially when all you can really say is, thats not true.
http://www.appetiteforprofit.com/2012/11/07/lies-dirty-tricks-and-45-million-kill-gmo-labeling-in-california/
(and for the pro-corporate water carrier's perspective):
I firmly believe that passing this legislation as it was proposed would have been a mistake.
The rallying cry for supporters of this proposition has been The Right To Know.
It sounds so simple: why shouldnt people know if their food is genetically modified?
What does Monsanto have to hide? But couching the issue in terms of knowledge assumes one thing: that labeling will be in any way informative. In the case of Prop 37, it simply wouldnt have been.
The simple fact is that there is no evidence that GMOs, as a blanket group, are dangerous. Theres a simple reason for this: not all GMOs are the same. Every plant created with genetic technology contains a different modification. More to the point, if the goal is to know more about whats in your food, a generic GMO label wont tell you. Adding Bt toxin to corn is different than adding Vitamin A to rice or vaccines to potatoes or heart-protective peptides to tomatoes.
http://www.businessinsider.com/scientists-happy-ca-prop-37-failed-2012-11
condoleeza
(814 posts)here is a 10 minute excerpt: [link:http://www.youtube.com/user/GeneticRoulette|
This issue is as important as jobs, IMO, we are what we eat.
Well, I give up, I can't make the link work from what I can see here, so if you don't see a link just go to YouTube and search for Genetic Roulette.
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)Same as with labeling kosher food.
Non kosher food isn't poison. But some believe it is unclean or whatever and it hurts nothing to label it.
Comrade_McKenzie
(2,526 posts)4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)If you don't feel you have enough info waiting to make a decision is always the best course of action.