John Durham Just Made False Statements to Congress
Source: Mother Jones
John Durhamthe special counsel who was appointed by then-Attorney General Bill Barr to investigate the FBIs investigation of the Trump-Russia scandal and who utterly failed to produce evidence it was a hoaxtestified before the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday. In doing so, he made false statements to Congress. He might even have lied.
Durham spent four years on a crusade that Donald Trump and others hoped would back up Trumps claim that the Russia investigation was cooked up by his enemies within the supposed Deep State. Yet Durham came up empty on this front, losing two jury trials unrelated to the origins of the FBIs inquiry and winning a guilty plea from an FBI lawyer who had altered an email to support a surveillance warrant for a former Trump campaign adviser. He prosecuted no FBI officials or Obama administration officials for the supposedly big crime of mounting a plot (or witch hunt!) against Trump. Durham even concluded there was justification for the FBI to have initiated a preliminary investigation, just not a full investigation, of Russias attack on the 2016 election and contacts between the Trump campaign and Russia.
When Durham came before the committee, House Republicans eagerly picked over the scraps in his final report, which has been much criticized, and they treated him as a hero. But under questioning from Democratic and Republican members, Durham misrepresented key aspects of the Russia scandal, suggesting he was either unfamiliar with basic facts or was purposefully trying to mislead the committee and the American public.
During his turn to question Durham, Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) asked Durham about the infamous meeting held in Trump Tower on June 9, 2016, when Donald Trump Jr., Jared Kushner, and Paul Manafortthree of Trumps top campaign adviserssat down with an emissary of the Russian government whom they were told had dirt on Hillary Clinton to share. An email sent to Trump Jr. from a business associate that set up this session informed the candidates son that this meeting was part of a secret Russian scheme to help Trumps campaign. Durham dismissed the matter, remarking, People get phone calls all the time from individuals who claim to have information like that.
Read more: https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2023/06/john-durham-just-made-false-statements-to-congress/
Oopsie Daisy
(2,675 posts)LymphocyteLover
(5,654 posts)1st Trump impeachment.
Oopsie Daisy
(2,675 posts)LymphocyteLover
(5,654 posts)don't like Biden-- not left enough, too corporate or some such crap
intrepidity
(7,336 posts)I object to having to click a link just to see what the headline refers to. Just sayin.
That is not true.
The report produced by special counsel Robert Mueller notes that the Russian emissary, a lawyer named Natalia Veselnitskaya, did discuss Clinton: Participants agreed that Veselnitskaya stated that the Ziff brothers [an American family investment firm] had broken Russian laws and had donated their profits to the DNC or the Clinton Campaign. She asserted that the Ziff brothers had engaged in tax evasion and money laundering in both the United States and Russia. (There was no evidence that Ziff Brothers Investments had engaged in wrongdoing.)
The Mueller report points out that Trump Jr. zeroed in on this: Trump Jr. asked follow-up questions about how the alleged payments could be tied specifically to the Clinton Campaign, but Veselnitskaya indicated that she could not trace the money once it entered the United States. The report quotes a participant in the meeting recalling that Trump Jr. asked what they [the Russians] have on Clinton.
jayschool2013
(2,313 posts)I was lazy. Sorry about that. I figured with a free news site, a single click wouldn't be a burden.
I apologize for making you work harder than you needed.
intrepidity
(7,336 posts)It all adds up.