Republicans Eye SNAP Junk Food Restrictions In Government Funding Standoff
Source: Huff Post
Feb 26, 2024, 05:43 PM EST
WASHINGTON The next government shutdown fight could also be a food fight. Republicans could win a crackdown on junk food in the federal governments flagship nutrition program in legislation Congress needs to pass this week to prevent a partial government shutdown on Friday.
Democrats oppose adding dietary restrictions to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, but theyre eager to boost funding in a smaller program that helps pregnant women and nursing mothers buy nutritious food, so a deal is at hand. Rep. Andy Harris (R-Md.) has proposed asking states to test out limiting SNAP benefits to only nutrient-dense foods and beverages, meaning no soda or candy. Data suggests that sweetened beverages are a major expenditure for households receiving SNAP benefits.
Harris, a member of the House committee that writes funding bills, has argued restricting SNAP spending on junk food could combat the obesity epidemic and potentially save the government money. If SNAP more effectively addressed nutrition, it could help reduce the prevalence of obesity, which in turn would lower healthcare costs in the U.S. and help address the countrys long-term fiscal challenges, Harris wrote in a joint op-ed with Angela Rachidi, from the conservative American Enterprise Institute, earlier this year. An important first step is to restrict sweetened beverages from SNAP.
More than 20 million households receive monthly SNAP benefits, averaging $363, that can be redeemed at grocery stores for almost any food item. Its one of the federal governments most responsive and best-known anti-poverty programs. The Harris proposal calls for pilot projects testing a junk food ban in at least one state, but no more than five. Democrats are also angling for a nutrition policy change, namely more funding for the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children, commonly known as WIC.
Read more: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/snap-dietary-restrictions-government-shutdown_n_65dceef4e4b0189a6a7eeea2
.
MissMillie
(38,578 posts)But not guns!
Marthe48
(17,018 posts)The junk food. Pick up a any flyer, look at any store specials. Chips, soda, processed crap. I imagine the junk people trying to impose their less money for less food for poor people are going to piss off the processed food giants by targeting their main products.
BumRushDaShow
(129,440 posts)where the snack companies, supposedly due to the injectable weight loss drug phenomena, have talked about more discounting so they don't lose their market share.
Freethinker65
(10,048 posts)When I volunteered at the local food pantry, we had many nutritious options as well as over processed meals in a can or breakfast cereals. Processed items were preferred by many because they had no access to full kitchens. We typically had fresh/frozen meats and produce for those that could use it. Items like quinoa (near sell by date) and fresh artichokes (oversupply from local markets) were largely avoided as few knew how to prepare them.
Farmer-Rick
(10,207 posts)Everybody loves the eggs though.
Even in a poorly equipped kitchen, you can fry or boil an egg.
I even have had people meet me in the parking lot when I delivered freshly laid eggs from my small farm. But I tell them that the food pantry will be distributing them. Otherwise it would be a mob.
It's kind of sad to see so many people so hungry for fresh eggs. I always leave wishing I had more eggs to give out.
Marthe48
(17,018 posts)That's just so rich. This rwnj directive reminded me of something.
I read Animal Farm decades ago. The pigs controlled food to the other animals to assert dominance.
Blues Heron
(5,940 posts)Andy is full of it as usual.
Farmer-Rick
(10,207 posts)Fascists doing something good for the poor? Yeah, I know it's about control but this would actually help some folks out with choices.
But it's never gonna happen. This is simply a plot by some GQP fascists to get campaign contributions from the snack food industry. Most of the snack food corporations stocks are held by financial institutions...banks. It's a way to catch the attention of the filthy-rich and get some more political donations.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)as I was exiting a fast food place. I gave him $5 cash and he flatly said it wasn't enough, I needed to give him more and pointed to the prices of the fast food menu items. So I gave him a few extra dollar bills that I was carrying.
The thing is I don't carry much cash at all these days. I'm retired and always shop either by home delivery or at the store with a debit card.
cbabe
(3,549 posts)Kelloggs CEO: Let them eat Corn Flakes for dinner
By Nathaniel Meyersohn, CNN
3 minute read
Updated 4:00 PM EST, Mon February 26, 2024
New York
CNN
Let them eat Corn Flakes appears to be Kelloggs CEO Gary Pilnicks advice to cash-strapped shoppers who are spending the highest portion of their income on food than at any point in the last 30 years.
In an interview with CNBC last week, WK Kellogg CEO Pilnick said the company was advertising cereal for dinner to consumers looking for more affordable options. Give chicken the night off, the ads cheery tagline reads. WK Kellogg owns cereals such as Frosted Flakes, Froot Loops, Corn Flakes, Raisin Bran and others.
Food companies have raised prices since the start of the pandemic to cover higher costs for labor, ingredients and transportation and because they could.
Cereal prices alone increased 28% since January of 2020, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. In its latest fiscal year, Kellogg raised prices by 12%.
more $4million dollar man gives advice