Comer: Criminal referrals in Biden probe could come 'within weeks'
Source: The Hill
04/17/24 12:05 PM ET
House Oversight Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) said Wednesday that criminal referrals stemming from his investigation into President Biden could come within weeks even as he cautioned that impeachment is still on the table. Comer told Foxs Maria Bartiromo that criminal referrals may be swiftly considered now that President Biden and his son Hunter Biden both declined to appear before the committee.
I think that what we had to do was give both Bidens an opportunity to come set the record straight, Comer said, adding he does not believe there have ever been criminal referrals for an immediate president of the United States and their family. The consideration of criminal referrals as a way to wrap up the investigation dovetailed with growing skepticism in the GOP over whether there would be sufficient votes to back an impeachment effort.
Numerous GOP colleagues have said they have not seen enough evidence to support impeaching the president, while Democrats have pushed Comer to name a crime he believes President Biden has committed. The suggestion that such referrals could come within weeks is a more expedited timeline than Comer has previously suggested and the chair also told Bartiromo that, I think youre gonna see this thing start to wrap up very soon.
Criminal referrals, which typically must also be voted on by the full House, largely serve as a recommendation from Congress to the Justice Department that it should take up an investigation.
Read more: https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4600059-comer-house-oversight-bidens-criminal-referrals/
underpants
(182,848 posts)Link to tweet
?s=46&t=3VBm1LJ8j8qLp6JTs_8J2A
Traurigkeit
(194 posts)niyad
(113,474 posts)Traurigkeit
(194 posts)one would want every politician in the United States to be democratic but alas that has never been the truth.
niyad
(113,474 posts)people choose to use them.
JohnSJ
(92,277 posts)by republicans, to imply the DEMOCRATC PARTY is democratic. They do not define us.
Retrograde
(10,137 posts)he and his minions came up with DemocRAT party, with the emphasis on RAT. That's one reason why we Democrats don't use that term (the other being grammar)
RockRaven
(14,978 posts)their facilities' procurement folks can reduce their next toilet paper order correspondingly.
Dulcinea
(6,651 posts)Yeah, because you have nothing. President Biden has work to do & no time for this crap. Get lost, loser.
Kid Berwyn
(14,932 posts)Alexander Smirnov, for one, wants to know.
kysrsoze
(6,022 posts)Comer belongs in prison for treason.
Traurigkeit
(194 posts)niyad
(113,474 posts)Doodley
(9,103 posts)Permanut
(5,617 posts)but, see, your guy's crimes are more bigly hugh. We'll show you next week. We're waiting for Pillow Guy to provide us with the undeniable, rock solid gold plated evidence of something.
keithbvadu2
(36,836 posts)bluestarone
(16,993 posts)Tomorrow that never comes
PatSeg
(47,536 posts)He's never going to let it go. Clearly he's a one trick pony and his trick sucks.
cstanleytech
(26,303 posts)He got caught though and he's scared that instead of getting the tuna or his usually can of moist cat food that he's going to have the dry stuff for a week.
PatSeg
(47,536 posts)I can actually picture Comer knocking the can off the shelf.
NanaCat
(1,178 posts)That doesn't mean you have evidence of a crime that DOJ can prosecute. Wanting there to be a crime doesn't mean one exists.
That's what the GQP traitors are too stupid to comprehend.
Pas-de-Calais
(9,905 posts)Ray Bruns
(4,101 posts)Talitha
(6,601 posts)Traurigkeit
(194 posts)Novara
(5,845 posts)Wonder Why
(3,224 posts)keithbvadu2
(36,836 posts)Wonder Why
(3,224 posts)Enquiring_Mind
(83 posts)Last gasp.
unblock
(52,273 posts)"We investigated the matter, and while we don't think it's severe enough even considering firing you, we do think you should go to prison for it."
cstanleytech
(26,303 posts)Turbineguy
(37,356 posts)ificandream
(9,378 posts)ProfessorGAC
(65,094 posts)...is saying "Hey DOJ, can you find something, anything, for us? Because we've got nada."