Hearing planned on state pot laws
Source: Politico
By SEUNG MIN KIM | 12/13/12 10:46 AM EST
The national spotlight on new state marijuana laws is making its way to Capitol Hill.
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) said Thursday that he plans to hold a hearing next year to ask the administration how it plans to handle the differences in federal and state laws on marijuana policy.
Leahy also released a letter to Gil Kerlikowske, director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy, seeking similar information. The Senate Judiciary Committee has a significant interest in the effect of these developments on federal drug control policy, Leahy wrote to Kerlikowske.
Legislative options exist to resolve the differences between federal and state law in this area and end the uncertainty that residents of Colorado and Washington now face. In order to give these options full consideration, the committee needs to understand how the administration intends to respond to the decision of the voters in Colorado and Washington. I look forward to hearing your thoughts on this matter.
-30-
Read more: http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-congress/2012/12/hearing-planned-on-state-pot-laws-151889.html
Garion_55
(1,915 posts)i swear if obama starts ramping up the war against pot in these states im going to seriously consider voting gop and letting the democrat party know exactly why and how they can win me back.
END THIS STUPID WAR!!
WestCoastLib
(442 posts)The GOP winning elections moves the Democratic party further to the Right, not the left.
Garion_55
(1,915 posts)a political party that i am having huge disagreements with that i shouldnt be having because we should be on the same side. at the voting booth.
WestCoastLib
(442 posts)Political Party 1 disagrees with you on Issue A.
So your theory is that you will vote for Political Party 2, who also disagrees with you on Issue A.
But Political party 1 agrees with you on Issues B, C & D
Political Party 2 also disagrees with you on Issues B, C & D.
It's called voting against your best interest (A.K.A. being a moron)
Garion_55
(1,915 posts)i usually get the namecalling from the other side lol
take a deep breath. it will all be ok lol
docgee
(870 posts)grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)1) Hemp advocates are currently one of the most effective political elements of the Dem party (as evidenced by their 50 year fight for legalization that resulted in major wins).
2) Obama alienates this motivated and politically active section of the Dem base by prosecuting them federally.
3) Hemp advocates move to the libertarian wing of the Republican party.
Again, it's a no-brainer.
Leave hemp advocates alone.
patrice
(47,992 posts)think
(11,641 posts)it would not surprise me to see the GOP figure out what math is once again like Obama should be in regards to legalization.
Obama has schooled the GOP with common sense and mathematics so far. Will the fear of political backlash from a dying cultural taboo overcome Obama's keen sense of math and objectivity? I guess we'll find out soon.....
progressoid
(49,992 posts)Here's a tip for you. If you are trying to pretend you are a Democrat, don't call us the "democrat party".
It's the Democratic party.
Mr.Bill
(24,307 posts)Nice catch.
patrice
(47,992 posts)Uncle Joe
(58,377 posts)a more functional and just approach to the issue of cannabis legalization or at the very least logical rescheduling of that most beneficial plant.
Thanks for the thread, DonViejo.
struggle4progress
(118,316 posts)Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)Ask Ed Forchion, the NJ Weedman, who was recently acquitted despite clearly being guilty.
Ask prosecutors in Missoula, Montana, who complain they can't find juries to sit on pot possession cases.
Swede Atlanta
(3,596 posts)They should arrest and incarcerate any DEA or other federal official attempting to interfere with state law in this regard. Period. Arrest their asses. The feds will not send in any troops to rescue these guys.
Mr.Bill
(24,307 posts)post the National Guard at marijuana retailers and force the issue with the feds.
Politicub
(12,165 posts)in dialogue.
While we all (or most of us) would like a blanket decriminalization of marijuana, it's not going to happen in a vacuum.
The legislative process needs to happen quickly before a case inevitably goes before the Supreme Court where an even stricter precedent could get set.