Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 12:29 PM Dec 2012

Hearing planned on state pot laws

Source: Politico

By SEUNG MIN KIM | 12/13/12 10:46 AM EST

The national spotlight on new state marijuana laws is making its way to Capitol Hill.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) said Thursday that he plans to hold a hearing next year to ask the administration how it plans to handle the differences in federal and state laws on marijuana policy.

Leahy also released a letter to Gil Kerlikowske, director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy, seeking similar information. “The Senate Judiciary Committee has a significant interest in the effect of these developments on federal drug control policy,” Leahy wrote to Kerlikowske.

“Legislative options exist to resolve the differences between federal and state law in this area and end the uncertainty that residents of Colorado and Washington now face. In order to give these options full consideration, the committee needs to understand how the administration intends to respond to the decision of the voters in Colorado and Washington. I look forward to hearing your thoughts on this matter.”

-30-

Read more: http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-congress/2012/12/hearing-planned-on-state-pot-laws-151889.html

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hearing planned on state pot laws (Original Post) DonViejo Dec 2012 OP
how about leaving pot smokers alone? Garion_55 Dec 2012 #1
You are an idiot if that's true WestCoastLib Dec 2012 #2
sorry but thats how i protest against Garion_55 Dec 2012 #6
Yes, and that makes you an idiot WestCoastLib Dec 2012 #7
so angry! Garion_55 Dec 2012 #8
^ Simple logic ^ nt docgee Dec 2012 #12
I'm afraid it's Obama that will be the idiot if he prosecutes these laws federally, grahamhgreen Dec 2012 #13
... Robb Dec 2012 #4
Word of advice: stay away from poker tables. You are likely to be a loser. nt patrice Dec 2012 #5
I would not vote for GOP over this issue but if Obama drops the ball on this think Dec 2012 #10
democrat party? progressoid Dec 2012 #17
Busted Mr.Bill Dec 2012 #19
KICK patrice Dec 2012 #3
K&R Scuba Dec 2012 #9
This is necessary and I hope the federal government begins to adapt Uncle Joe Dec 2012 #11
"Legislative options exist" -- good! We really don't want to encourage the nullification numbskulls! struggle4progress Dec 2012 #14
Jury nullification can be a useful tool when faced with absurd laws. Comrade Grumpy Dec 2012 #16
Suggest the states assert their authority.... Swede Atlanta Dec 2012 #15
I want to see some governor Mr.Bill Dec 2012 #20
Hearings were bound to happen, but they're an important step in engaging Politicub Dec 2012 #18

Garion_55

(1,915 posts)
1. how about leaving pot smokers alone?
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 12:37 PM
Dec 2012

i swear if obama starts ramping up the war against pot in these states im going to seriously consider voting gop and letting the democrat party know exactly why and how they can win me back.

END THIS STUPID WAR!!

WestCoastLib

(442 posts)
2. You are an idiot if that's true
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 12:39 PM
Dec 2012

The GOP winning elections moves the Democratic party further to the Right, not the left.

Garion_55

(1,915 posts)
6. sorry but thats how i protest against
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 12:46 PM
Dec 2012

a political party that i am having huge disagreements with that i shouldnt be having because we should be on the same side. at the voting booth.

WestCoastLib

(442 posts)
7. Yes, and that makes you an idiot
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 12:57 PM
Dec 2012

Political Party 1 disagrees with you on Issue A.

So your theory is that you will vote for Political Party 2, who also disagrees with you on Issue A.

But Political party 1 agrees with you on Issues B, C & D

Political Party 2 also disagrees with you on Issues B, C & D.

It's called voting against your best interest (A.K.A. being a moron)

Garion_55

(1,915 posts)
8. so angry!
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 01:00 PM
Dec 2012

i usually get the namecalling from the other side lol

take a deep breath. it will all be ok lol

 

grahamhgreen

(15,741 posts)
13. I'm afraid it's Obama that will be the idiot if he prosecutes these laws federally,
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 01:41 PM
Dec 2012

1) Hemp advocates are currently one of the most effective political elements of the Dem party (as evidenced by their 50 year fight for legalization that resulted in major wins).

2) Obama alienates this motivated and politically active section of the Dem base by prosecuting them federally.

3) Hemp advocates move to the libertarian wing of the Republican party.

Again, it's a no-brainer.

Leave hemp advocates alone.

 

think

(11,641 posts)
10. I would not vote for GOP over this issue but if Obama drops the ball on this
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 01:10 PM
Dec 2012

it would not surprise me to see the GOP figure out what math is once again like Obama should be in regards to legalization.

Obama has schooled the GOP with common sense and mathematics so far. Will the fear of political backlash from a dying cultural taboo overcome Obama's keen sense of math and objectivity? I guess we'll find out soon.....

progressoid

(49,992 posts)
17. democrat party?
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 02:25 PM
Dec 2012

Here's a tip for you. If you are trying to pretend you are a Democrat, don't call us the "democrat party".

It's the Democratic party.

Uncle Joe

(58,377 posts)
11. This is necessary and I hope the federal government begins to adapt
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 01:16 PM
Dec 2012

a more functional and just approach to the issue of cannabis legalization or at the very least logical rescheduling of that most beneficial plant.

Thanks for the thread, DonViejo.

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
16. Jury nullification can be a useful tool when faced with absurd laws.
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 02:08 PM
Dec 2012

Ask Ed Forchion, the NJ Weedman, who was recently acquitted despite clearly being guilty.

Ask prosecutors in Missoula, Montana, who complain they can't find juries to sit on pot possession cases.

 

Swede Atlanta

(3,596 posts)
15. Suggest the states assert their authority....
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 01:57 PM
Dec 2012

They should arrest and incarcerate any DEA or other federal official attempting to interfere with state law in this regard. Period. Arrest their asses. The feds will not send in any troops to rescue these guys.

Mr.Bill

(24,307 posts)
20. I want to see some governor
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 04:54 PM
Dec 2012

post the National Guard at marijuana retailers and force the issue with the feds.

Politicub

(12,165 posts)
18. Hearings were bound to happen, but they're an important step in engaging
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 02:45 PM
Dec 2012

in dialogue.

While we all (or most of us) would like a blanket decriminalization of marijuana, it's not going to happen in a vacuum.

The legislative process needs to happen quickly before a case inevitably goes before the Supreme Court where an even stricter precedent could get set.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Hearing planned on state ...