Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 05:01 PM Dec 2012

Obama Accepts Rice’s Decision To Withdraw

Source: TPM



IGOR BOBIC 3:53 PM EST, THURSDAY DECEMBER 13, 2012

President Obama on Thursday announced that he has accepted UN Ambassador Susan Rice's decision to withdraw her name from consideration to replace Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State:

Today, I spoke to Ambassador Susan Rice, and accepted her decision to remove her name from consideration for Secretary of State. For two decades, Susan has proven to be an extraordinarily capable, patriotic, and passionate public servant. As my Ambassador to the United Nations, she plays an indispensable role in advancing America’s interests. Already, she has secured international support for sanctions against Iran and North Korea, worked to protect the people of Libya, helped achieve an independent South Sudan, stood up for Israel’s security and legitimacy, and served as an advocate for UN reform and the human rights of all people. I am grateful that Susan will continue to serve as our Ambassador at the United Nations and a key member of my cabinet and national security team, carrying her work forward on all of these and other issues. I have every confidence that Susan has limitless capability to serve our country now and in the years to come, and know that I will continue to rely on her as an advisor and friend. While I deeply regret the unfair and misleading attacks on Susan Rice in recent weeks, her decision demonstrates the strength of her character, and an admirable commitment to rise above the politics of the moment to put our national interests first. The American people can be proud to have a public servant of her caliber and character representing our country.

Read more: http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/obama-accepts-rices-decision-to-withdraw

66 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama Accepts Rice’s Decision To Withdraw (Original Post) DonViejo Dec 2012 OP
Wow. Thought Obama just won an election. Nice mandate. n/t mikelgb Dec 2012 #1
Well, last I heard she did have a choice. What that means remains to be seen. nolabear Dec 2012 #2
Precisely, nolabear.. nothing to do with Prez' "mandate".. Cha Dec 2012 #6
We've watched the bullies for four years now, and nothing every happens. politicaljunkie41910 Dec 2012 #37
President Obama stands up to Bullies constantly.. Cha Dec 2012 #41
Likewise,with more time and money than I have ever spent on an plethoro Dec 2012 #48
Nothing ever happens? They just lost BIG in an election! Liberal_Stalwart71 Dec 2012 #59
... said the Ron/Rand Paul ally. nt patrice Dec 2012 #4
Even though I myself don't care for Susan Rice, I agree with plethoro Dec 2012 #5
I don't agree.. I don't think this has anything to do Cha Dec 2012 #9
I believe the choice was steered, and so we plethoro Dec 2012 #20
Do you even know what this means? "Seeming capitulation"? You mean he should nominate her even.... Tarheel_Dem Dec 2012 #14
I don't see it the way you do. I view it as a hiring decision. I was a Regional Controller for plethoro Dec 2012 #26
Your stellar career bona fides, notwithstanding, sometimes a duck is just a duck. Susan Rice has... Tarheel_Dem Dec 2012 #33
Here ya go. This will be part of my answer. As others have said here: Did we just have an election? plethoro Dec 2012 #35
OTOH, if it were decided that she Cha Dec 2012 #42
That still doesn't answer the question I put to you. Should the POTUS put forward the name of..... Tarheel_Dem Dec 2012 #45
Okay. You've muddied your stream a little with your slight question change at the beginning of this plethoro Dec 2012 #47
I'm glad. The XL pipeline issue was TOO much for me. nt patrice Dec 2012 #3
Caving already? Christ. budkin Dec 2012 #7
If the President wanted her and she wanted it.. Cha Dec 2012 #11
What a petty comment. But I guess we shouldn't expect much out of you. MjolnirTime Dec 2012 #32
What else can he do? He can't force her to be Secretary of State. arcane1 Dec 2012 #55
That is not how its played at that level. former9thward Dec 2012 #56
Speculation and mind-reading n/t arcane1 Dec 2012 #58
No intelligence. former9thward Dec 2012 #66
How did he cave? She wasn't nominated and there was no indication that she would be. Liberal_Stalwart71 Dec 2012 #60
So all you folks complaining about caving loyalkydem Dec 2012 #8
Give us something to be motivated to come out for then Fearless Dec 2012 #13
How's this for motivation loyalkydem Dec 2012 #16
AMEN!!! Who cares if Susan Rice is nominated.... jabhome Dec 2012 #21
Not to mention, it is entirely possible that the DC media was pressuring Obama with the leaks that karynnj Dec 2012 #46
Sadly people are not motivated by that. Fearless Dec 2012 #25
The Average person better start caring loyalkydem Dec 2012 #29
America is always about the average person Fearless Dec 2012 #31
The average person doesn't know who Susan Rice is. Liberal_Stalwart71 Dec 2012 #61
Very true Fearless Dec 2012 #63
And that can't be an excuse to do nothing. We already know that the Corporate Media refuses Liberal_Stalwart71 Dec 2012 #64
Agreed. Fearless Dec 2012 #65
I vote each time too, regardless! malibea Dec 2012 #34
The people who should have learned from 2010 Pab Sungenis Dec 2012 #30
At least, work to get more real progressives in Congress LongTomH Dec 2012 #19
As mentioned, since I was unclear, this is not about me Fearless Dec 2012 #27
what satxdem Dec 2012 #38
It doesn't work the other way around Fearless Dec 2012 #53
Good - she was too tainted by her past actions to be acceptable to true Democrats dbackjon Dec 2012 #10
And, what past actions are those? Cha Dec 2012 #12
Rwanda, Burundi, Congo, Keystone. dbackjon Dec 2012 #18
rwanda? satxdem Dec 2012 #40
Rice was one of reasons we stood idly by dbackjon Dec 2012 #44
Two words. burnsei sensei Dec 2012 #15
I didn't even know there was an official "list" marshall Dec 2012 #17
Spam deleted by gkhouston (MIR Team) Flumboyz Dec 2012 #22
Welcome to DU and I hope you enjoy the site. hrmjustin Dec 2012 #23
Why doesn't he just nominate a white male republican and get it over with. olddad56 Dec 2012 #24
PBO will nominate who he wants. Cha Dec 2012 #43
She really may not want to have gone through it -- and I wouldn't blame her. gateley Dec 2012 #28
to be honest, yet mean DonCoquixote Dec 2012 #36
If I was Obama DonCoquixote Dec 2012 #39
I was thinking the same thing ........ serbbral Dec 2012 #57
Dan Rather mimi85 Dec 2012 #49
Exactly!! mimi85 solara Dec 2012 #50
Rather has been anti-Obama for years now. He felt it "in his gut" that Romney would win. Liberal_Stalwart71 Dec 2012 #62
ABK graham4anything Dec 2012 #51
I think there is something we don't know about this story... Mike Nelson Dec 2012 #52
Congrats to McCain, Graham and Ayotte AnnieBW Dec 2012 #54

nolabear

(41,987 posts)
2. Well, last I heard she did have a choice. What that means remains to be seen.
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 05:09 PM
Dec 2012

As I always do, I suspect there are things going on behind the scenes that it's impossible for us to appreciate. If her life was to be made miserable and she would in fact be a source of endless GOP bullshit, then her withdrawal, whether her actual idea or not, is a manipulable item. The GOP will try to push it one way, the Dems another, and we'll see what happens.

Cha

(297,378 posts)
6. Precisely, nolabear.. nothing to do with Prez' "mandate"..
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 05:17 PM
Dec 2012
“If nominated, I am now convinced that the confirmation process would be lengthy, disruptive and costly – to you and to our most pressing national and international priorities,” Rice wrote in a letter to President Obama, saying she’s saddened by the partisan politics surrounding her prospects.


http://rockcenter.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/12/13/15888883-exclusive-susan-rice-drops-out-of-running-for-secretary-of-state-saddened-by-partisan-politics?chromedomain=nbcpolitics

The Bullies will get their Backlash.. we'll see how this all turns out.

politicaljunkie41910

(3,335 posts)
37. We've watched the bullies for four years now, and nothing every happens.
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 07:33 PM
Dec 2012

Sometimes you have to bloody a few noses before the bullies get the message. It seems like the President is unwilling to do that.

I voted for him twice, as did all my family, and my husband worked countless hours at one of his phonebanks. I'm tired of waiting for him to stand up to the bullies.

Cha

(297,378 posts)
41. President Obama stands up to Bullies constantly..
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 07:49 PM
Dec 2012

there's more going on here than standing up to john fucking mccain.

"Nothing ever happens".. the bullies lost the election that's what happened..and they're are gong to keep losing.

 

plethoro

(594 posts)
48. Likewise,with more time and money than I have ever spent on an
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 10:21 PM
Dec 2012

election before. Bullies take confidence when there is a refusal to confront them. The cliff looms larger now.

 

plethoro

(594 posts)
5. Even though I myself don't care for Susan Rice, I agree with
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 05:15 PM
Dec 2012

the inference in your post. Obama should have been able to choose who he wanted. Will this seeming capitulation to the Repubs come back to haunt Obama? I don't know, but, for sure, Obama doesn't need another one.

Cha

(297,378 posts)
9. I don't agree.. I don't think this has anything to do
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 05:21 PM
Dec 2012

with President Obama's "mandate". Susan had a choice and she chose to pull her name from nomination. I don't think the Bullies won, either... they have a way of getting Backlash that isn't always apparent at first.

 

plethoro

(594 posts)
20. I believe the choice was steered, and so we
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 06:06 PM
Dec 2012

simply disagree. Let's see what happens in the first quarter next year.

Tarheel_Dem

(31,235 posts)
14. Do you even know what this means? "Seeming capitulation"? You mean he should nominate her even....
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 05:33 PM
Dec 2012

if she doesn't want the job? The BOF crowd is really reaching with this one, and it's pathetic.

 

plethoro

(594 posts)
26. I don't see it the way you do. I view it as a hiring decision. I was a Regional Controller for
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 06:25 PM
Dec 2012

a large corporation. If I liked someone and had studied their work and productivity, I would hire them. If they declined using "good of the company reasoning" I might question if they think I did not have the good of the company belief for my hiring decision. I quite frankly don't believe that Rice made her bow-out of her own volition. But that's simply my belief based on like-kinds of decisions I have seen over the last four years. I don't know what BOF stands for. My "seeming capitulation" characterization is how I think the media and the Republican Party may view it. I'll know if I was right in a few days.

Tarheel_Dem

(31,235 posts)
33. Your stellar career bona fides, notwithstanding, sometimes a duck is just a duck. Susan Rice has...
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 07:06 PM
Dec 2012

a teevee, just like the rest of us. She made the rounds on Capitol Hill, and her reception was one of prejudgement and opposition, and it stands to reason that she came to the conclusion that she wouldn't be able to overcome the preconceived notions of that opposition. Why would anyone put themselves through a fight they don't think they can win? And if she feels this way, why would the president put her through such a circus? For your amusement, and to prove what point exactly?

 

plethoro

(594 posts)
35. Here ya go. This will be part of my answer. As others have said here: Did we just have an election?
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 07:17 PM
Dec 2012

Susan Rice was just another opportunity to display steadfastness, my potential amusement notwithstnanding. To show one is a winner by action and deed. When you plant your flag at the top of the hill, you don't then set it on fire. Like I said, I view things differently than you. I was Ike. You may have been more Clinton. No harm, no foul.


http://www.thenation.com/blog/171728/emerging-fiscal-cliff-deal-spares-corporations-not-safety-net?rel=emailNation#

Cha

(297,378 posts)
42. OTOH, if it were decided that she
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 07:52 PM
Dec 2012

wouldn't be the best choice ..there would be no reason to keep pushing her just because it would look like he was backing down from john fucking mccain.. like so many are Jumping on.

Tarheel_Dem

(31,235 posts)
45. That still doesn't answer the question I put to you. Should the POTUS put forward the name of.....
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 08:07 PM
Dec 2012

someone who has bowed out? I'm still scratching my head to come up with a reason the President would put her through that. She said NO. She withdrew her name, and all the speculation to the contrary makes you look foolish as the people who initially attacked her. She's a brilliant woman, who's been around DC for a couple of decades now. I imagine she can read tea leaves as well as any politico. Besides, she was being attacked on the left for having financial ties to the XL pipeline, so there are many reasons why she would choose to drop out, that have absolutely nothing to do with the president.

 

plethoro

(594 posts)
47. Okay. You've muddied your stream a little with your slight question change at the beginning of this
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 09:51 PM
Dec 2012

post, so I'll demur. The tone has now been set for January and possibly the next four years. I'll side with the DUer's who have claimed surrender. Remember, I maintain this position even though I can't stand Rice. She's a neocon who has sided with those favoring among other things slavery. She is arrogant in attitude and tone. It would have been like Spock becoming SOS. So, we have this issued resolved. You maintain your position, same as me maintaining mine. Somewhere a bunch of inverse fascists are smiling.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
55. What else can he do? He can't force her to be Secretary of State.
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 11:15 PM
Dec 2012

She withdrew herself; there isn't much the president can do about that.

If I go to my boss tomorrow and say "I quit" he can't make me stay there and continue working. That doesn't mean he "caved".

former9thward

(32,030 posts)
56. That is not how its played at that level.
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 01:15 AM
Dec 2012

If Obama wanted her to stay in she would have stayed in. If Obama wanted her out she would be told to write a statement of withdrawal. She wants to stay in the circles of power so she will go along with what the White House wants.

 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
60. How did he cave? She wasn't nominated and there was no indication that she would be.
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 01:35 PM
Dec 2012

She was on the shortlist. The ReThugs saw that list and went after her. She couldn't take the heat and withdrew her name.

Fearless

(18,421 posts)
13. Give us something to be motivated to come out for then
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 05:25 PM
Dec 2012

I guess that's the message in politics. What have you done for us lately?

loyalkydem

(1,678 posts)
16. How's this for motivation
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 05:42 PM
Dec 2012

a repeat of 2010 where Republicans gain more control over states where they pass more right to work laws, where they go after unions, go after a woman's right to choose and where they will change how states award delegates. Is that motivation enough for you. It's time for you to get over this minor crap and focus on the long term.

jabhome

(2 posts)
21. AMEN!!! Who cares if Susan Rice is nominated....
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 06:07 PM
Dec 2012

if that is what would motivate anyone to get to the polls that is a joke. What matters are policies, especially those listed above by Loyalkydem.

karynnj

(59,504 posts)
46. Not to mention, it is entirely possible that the DC media was pressuring Obama with the leaks that
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 08:40 PM
Dec 2012

she was the number one choice. You might notice that almost every rumor or inside story placing Rice as the number one choice started in the Washington Post.

Fearless

(18,421 posts)
25. Sadly people are not motivated by that.
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 06:22 PM
Dec 2012

None of this is about me either. I will vote each and every time regardless. This is about the "average person" who does in fact need a reason to go to the polls. It's basic political theory.

loyalkydem

(1,678 posts)
29. The Average person better start caring
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 06:29 PM
Dec 2012

It's no longer about the average person, the future of this nation is at stake and instead of reacting to stuff like this we need to start fighting back.

Fearless

(18,421 posts)
31. America is always about the average person
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 06:33 PM
Dec 2012

And unfortunately the average person doesn't realize that they've been screwed over until it's done. But, I do agree. We need to start fighting back.

 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
64. And that can't be an excuse to do nothing. We already know that the Corporate Media refuses
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 04:14 PM
Dec 2012

to do its job to educate people. And I'm seeing everyday that people are doing their part.

I'm a political scientist by trade, and I've heard more average Americans having discussions about the "fiscal cliff," filibusters, and redistricting.

I'm not suggesting that these are widespread discussions, but we must do our part too.

If the wingnuts can get involved, I don't see why we can't.

malibea

(179 posts)
34. I vote each time too, regardless!
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 07:13 PM
Dec 2012

I agree with you on the voting issue. I vote each and every time I am supposed to, regardless of whether I have a "dog in the fight" or not. I even vote absentee if I will be away from my polling place. Perhaps I care more about what happens than some others do. But to each his own, just remember if you don't vote, don't gripe!

 

Pab Sungenis

(9,612 posts)
30. The people who should have learned from 2010
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 06:32 PM
Dec 2012

are the Blue Dogs, Third Wayers, and Closet Republicans who thought that the Democratic base would accept whatever they threw at us because we had no place else to go. A large chunk proved they did have a place to go: home. More caving is going to further alienate the base and could cause the collapse of the party altogether.

LongTomH

(8,636 posts)
19. At least, work to get more real progressives in Congress
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 05:52 PM
Dec 2012

If there's no progressive choice in your state/district, cross state lines to phonebank for progressives or donate.

Do something!

Fearless

(18,421 posts)
27. As mentioned, since I was unclear, this is not about me
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 06:26 PM
Dec 2012

This is about the average voter. The average voter needs a reason to go to the polls. 2008 was a huge reason... post Bush presidency... first Black (major) candidate... etc. in 2000-4 it was the marriage equality boogie man. Everyone needs a cause to be motivated to the polls. Some of us are lucky enough to find that motivation from within and vote every time, others do not. We need to motivate people to vote.

satxdem

(131 posts)
40. rwanda?
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 07:38 PM
Dec 2012

What about rwanda? Those children and women who were getting raped in rwanda saw no help, which is what Rice advocated and she was right to. But Clinton decided not to step in so I'm not sure what the problem with rwanda is?

 

dbackjon

(6,578 posts)
44. Rice was one of reasons we stood idly by
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 08:06 PM
Dec 2012

And her dealing in Congo/Zaire were not what you want a SOS to have done.

burnsei sensei

(1,820 posts)
15. Two words.
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 05:40 PM
Dec 2012

Bullying worked.
I think this episode should stick to John McCain and Miss Lindsey for the remainder of their public lives.
I'm sure this is part of the larger ploy to force John Kerry into the SoS position.

marshall

(6,665 posts)
17. I didn't even know there was an official "list"
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 05:43 PM
Dec 2012

I thought at this point it was just informed rumor that Mrs. Clinton was stepping down--I didn't know she had made any official announcement. And surely her announcement would precede the announcement of an official list of her possible replacement.

gateley

(62,683 posts)
28. She really may not want to have gone through it -- and I wouldn't blame her.
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 06:28 PM
Dec 2012

My sense is that it was her decision, not a Van Jones type of thing. But what do I know? I'm probably wrong about Van Jones, too.

Sorry this happened, regardless of the reason.

I hate Republicans.

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
36. to be honest, yet mean
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 07:26 PM
Dec 2012

If she was going to wilt in the heat of the press, she was unfit for the job, period. I may dislike Hillary, but one thing even those who do dislike her to admit is that she can take the hard left hooks and low blows. Whoever becomes SoS is going to need to be tough, because the GOP will try every dirty trick in the book to save their Military empire.

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
39. If I was Obama
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 07:35 PM
Dec 2012

I would use this to toss away someone that really was not a good fit anyway (keystone Rice) and nominate someone that the GOP would hate even more, maybe even Bill Clinton, or Dennis K.

serbbral

(260 posts)
57. I was thinking the same thing ........
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 09:32 AM
Dec 2012

I have nothing against John Kerry, but it would be nice if Obama could find someone equally qualified for the job and also someone who would be a complete surprise to everyone and make the GOP firing mad. Picking Kerry would be giving in too easily to them.

mimi85

(1,805 posts)
49. Dan Rather
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 10:33 PM
Dec 2012

was just jumping on PBO for being "weak" etc. etc. Not sure what he has against the President, but he really criticized him big time. I think Obama stood by Rice as much as he could without having this whole thing strung out when there is so much else going on. I think Rather was WAY off base.

 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
62. Rather has been anti-Obama for years now. He felt it "in his gut" that Romney would win.
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 01:39 PM
Dec 2012

On every show he's on, he has nothing good to say about the president at all. Surprised he's not on Faux.

Mike Nelson

(9,961 posts)
52. I think there is something we don't know about this story...
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 10:52 PM
Dec 2012

President Obama's statement was very nice.

AnnieBW

(10,438 posts)
54. Congrats to McCain, Graham and Ayotte
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 11:01 PM
Dec 2012

They have a black woman's scalp now. Go fuck yourselves, boys.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Obama Accepts Rice’s Deci...