Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Fri Jan 11, 2013, 06:00 PM Jan 2013

Report: Lautenberg Aide Slams Booker For Being ‘Self-Absorbed And Disrespectful’

Source: TPM



TOM KLUDT 2:57 PM EST, FRIDAY JANUARY 11, 2013

It is still unclear if Cory Booker (D) will square off with Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ) in a primary for the 2014 U.S. Senate race, but a report published Friday in Politico suggested that the longtime senator took umbrage to the high-profile Newark, N.J. mayor's decision to pursue his seat.

The story quoted an unnamed senior adviser to Lautenberg, who had choice words for Booker.

“This guy is self-absorbed and disrespectful,” the adviser said of Booker, who filed his campaign papers with the Federal Election Commision for the Senate race earlier this week. “It’s shameful that he avoided challenging a Republican just so that he can take on a long-serving, loyal Democrat."

Booker said during an appearance on CNN Monday that he has yet to meet with Lautenberg, noting he wants to give the 88-year-old incumbent "space to make his own decision." Lautenberg has yet to announce if he will seek a sixth term, but a poll released Thursday indicated that New Jersey Democrats would prefer to see Booker hold the seat.

-30-

Read more: http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/report-lautenberg-aide-slams-booker-for-being-self?ref=fpb

39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Report: Lautenberg Aide Slams Booker For Being ‘Self-Absorbed And Disrespectful’ (Original Post) DonViejo Jan 2013 OP
Oh my God. 88? Unless you're trying to win the Strom Thurmond TwilightGardener Jan 2013 #1
Isn't Lautenberg the same one who was implicated in the Abscam scandal? Tempest Jan 2013 #2
link please n/t Enrique Jan 2013 #5
This message was self-deleted by its author Tempest Jan 2013 #6
So... SoapBox Jan 2013 #7
I stand corrected Tempest Jan 2013 #9
Absolutely NOT - there are no scandals with Lautenberg - none even suggested karynnj Jan 2013 #12
Corrected hours ago if you took the time to read the posts. n/t Tempest Jan 2013 #13
I went BEYOND saying he was not involved in ABSCAM karynnj Jan 2013 #14
I agree. Beacool Jan 2013 #15
"He has been one of the most consistent liberals there is." JVS Jan 2013 #18
I'm shocked by the ageism here at DU. It saddens me. By all accounts, Lautenberg has done a good Liberal_Stalwart71 Jan 2013 #23
This message was self-deleted by its author Ken Burch Jan 2013 #34
Once again, I corrected myself yesterday. You're beating a dead horse. n/t Tempest Jan 2013 #35
Sorry. Wasn't meaning to hassle you. Ken Burch Jan 2013 #36
No problem. Got a little sensitive after the second time it happened after I corrected myself. n/t Tempest Jan 2013 #37
We've all been there. Ken Burch Jan 2013 #38
If Booker desires a Senate seat ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2013 #3
No, but he should at least afford Lautenberg the decency and respect to speak with him. Liberal_Stalwart71 Jan 2013 #24
Also, Booker should publicly commit to remaining a Dem if elected Ken Burch Jan 2013 #39
Talk about self-absorbed. n/t Bonhomme Richard Jan 2013 #4
I think both men know something about being self-absorbed. n/t hrmjustin Jan 2013 #8
For the love of there is no "I" in team, Frank BeyondGeography Jan 2013 #10
This is from an aide who will lose his job, greedy aide at that. This is NOT from Lautenberg himself graham4anything Jan 2013 #11
Someone not wanting to lose one's job makes one greedy? Seeking Serenity Jan 2013 #26
But they should not speak for the Senator. I don't think he would have run again anyhow. graham4anything Jan 2013 #28
I don't know if Lautenberg is planning to run for reelection. Beacool Jan 2013 #16
I agree! that would be really wrong. (D) Lautenberg has been pretty good from what I know, and to Divine Discontent Jan 2013 #17
Booker has always been very ambitious. Beacool Jan 2013 #21
Lautenberg needs to retire...period. BluegrassDem Jan 2013 #19
How do you know this? You don't. It's speculation. Liberal_Stalwart71 Jan 2013 #25
I have really mixed feelings on this one. Lautenberg is SOLID but he'll be 88 in 2014... Rowdyboy Jan 2013 #20
I'm starting to see this about Cory Booker, too. First, his defense of Bain Capital really irked me. Liberal_Stalwart71 Jan 2013 #22
He seems to really like Wall Street in general. amandabeech Jan 2013 #33
I understand respecting those who came before you but... Blasphemer Jan 2013 #27
I'm against term limits... RudynJack Jan 2013 #29
Tell that to Strom Thurmond and Robert Byrd. Who died in office. Stringfellow Hawke Jan 2013 #30
Byrd died at 92 RudynJack Jan 2013 #31
Booker is a centrist wind-sock. Odin2005 Jan 2013 #32

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
1. Oh my God. 88? Unless you're trying to win the Strom Thurmond
Fri Jan 11, 2013, 06:05 PM
Jan 2013

Longevity Award, retire with dignity instead of a sad primary fight...please...

Tempest

(14,591 posts)
2. Isn't Lautenberg the same one who was implicated in the Abscam scandal?
Fri Jan 11, 2013, 06:07 PM
Jan 2013

And was almost kicked out of Congress because of it?

This guy really needs to learn to keep his mouth shut.

Response to Enrique (Reply #5)

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
7. So...
Fri Jan 11, 2013, 06:27 PM
Jan 2013

and I did not read all through this stuff. If you Google, it's all over the place. Looks like Lautenberg was NOT involved? Only took the place of Harrison Williams who was involved and resigned? Feel free to correct me!

"In 1982 he received the Democratic nomination for a US Senate seat from New Jersey. The seat had been occupied by Democrat Harrison Williams, who resigned on March 11, 1982 after being implicated in the Abscam scandal.Lautenberg won the election and took office several days before the traditional swearing-in of senators."

http://www.opencongress.org/wiki/Frank_Lautenberg

------------

"Abscam (sometimes ABSCAM) was a United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) sting operation run from the FBI's Hauppauge, Long Island, office in the late 1970s and early 1980s. The operation initially targeted trafficking in stolen property but was converted to a public corruption investigation.

The investigation ultimately led to the conviction of a United States Senator, five members of the House of Representatives, one member of the New Jersey State Senate, members of the Philadelphia City Council, and an inspector for the Immigration and Naturalization Service."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abscam

Tempest

(14,591 posts)
9. I stand corrected
Fri Jan 11, 2013, 06:30 PM
Jan 2013

I went from memory and got the facts wrong.

It was Williams and Lautenberg replaced him.

karynnj

(59,504 posts)
12. Absolutely NOT - there are no scandals with Lautenberg - none even suggested
Fri Jan 11, 2013, 09:17 PM
Jan 2013

that was Harrison Williams.

Lautenberg should be a DU hero. He has been a consistent advocate for the poor ... not justthe middle class. As to pro labor, he explained why he got into politics at a Democratic event in Morris County when someone mentioned they were from Patterson and their parents (grandparents) knew his father.

His father was an immigrant who settled in NJ in Patterson and worked in the Patterson silk factories. He spoke of how is father argued that he need to get an education and NEVER work in those factories. He spoke of his dad describing how you could see the minute particles of silk when you looked toward the light from the window. His dad spoke of how this likely was not healthful -- and it wasn't. His dad died young - I think he said in his 40s.

Lautenberg served in WWII and went to college on a GI bill. He eventually became very successful in business in the best way. He started a company called ADP. He became rich, sold the company and went into politics. He has been one of the most consistent liberals there is. Oh his reason for becoming involved in politics - he wanted to be on the side of people without power - like his dad was.

karynnj

(59,504 posts)
14. I went BEYOND saying he was not involved in ABSCAM
Fri Jan 11, 2013, 09:33 PM
Jan 2013

He was my Senator (until I moved in December) and he is an extraordinarily good person.

I wanted to relate a story I personally heard him tell in 2006 when he was with the Morris county Democrats when he was lobbying for Menendez. Incidentally, my experience was that he spoke to regular (not powerful) Democrats more than the younger Menendez did in Morris County. I assume that this was because Menendez knew the county was pretty Republican.

Booker is interesting - and he very likely will be the next Senator. If Lautenberg were even 10 years younger - I would argue that this would be a loss. Lautenberg is by far the more progressive and liberal - and still feisty. Two things I remember are - that in 2004 - He actually spoke in the Senate explaining with a poster what a chicken hawk was -- and in 2005, when Bush was pushing privatization of SS a group of Senators spoke with selected people using the program. Though the Senators included Kerry, who should have been President and Hillary Clinton who everyone thought would be the next President, the Senator who was most effective was --- Lautenberg in a dialogue with a Brooklyn man of nearly the same age. Between them they made the case for SS - and totally impressed the people with them.

JVS

(61,935 posts)
18. "He has been one of the most consistent liberals there is."
Sat Jan 12, 2013, 03:11 AM
Jan 2013

And that's why the new dems want to shit all over him. He's keeping them from having a nice seat from which to pursue centrism.

 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
23. I'm shocked by the ageism here at DU. It saddens me. By all accounts, Lautenberg has done a good
Sat Jan 12, 2013, 11:30 AM
Jan 2013

job for New Jersey. Why the disrespect?

Response to Tempest (Reply #2)

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
36. Sorry. Wasn't meaning to hassle you.
Sat Jan 12, 2013, 06:30 PM
Jan 2013

Hadn't read all the relevant posts until now. Have now self-deleted the post you were responding to.

Tempest

(14,591 posts)
37. No problem. Got a little sensitive after the second time it happened after I corrected myself. n/t
Sat Jan 12, 2013, 06:45 PM
Jan 2013
 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
3. If Booker desires a Senate seat ...
Fri Jan 11, 2013, 06:13 PM
Jan 2013

where, and whom, should he challenge? Should he move to another state?

 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
24. No, but he should at least afford Lautenberg the decency and respect to speak with him.
Sat Jan 12, 2013, 11:32 AM
Jan 2013

Democrats shouldn't treat other Democrats like this.

Lautenberg is not entitled to that seat; on the other hand, I see nothing wrong with at least speaking with him, since he does still hold it.

I'm disappointed in Cory Booker. I don't like the way he's going about this whole thing. It makes him seem cold and calculating.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
39. Also, Booker should publicly commit to remaining a Dem if elected
Sat Jan 12, 2013, 06:58 PM
Jan 2013

A lot of the time, he's run his city like a "pro-business" center-right independent, and I'm not sure he can be trusted NOT to cross the floor if elected.

 

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)
11. This is from an aide who will lose his job, greedy aide at that. This is NOT from Lautenberg himself
Fri Jan 11, 2013, 07:02 PM
Jan 2013

it is always the staffers who are greedy, as it is their job they won't have when a new person comes in.

but remember- Lautenberg retired a few years back, and only because no one else could be found did he come out of retirement. He never planned on still being senator.
(it was because another whiner, Bill Bradley disappeared from the face of the earth after dribbling his basketball and leaving the arena like a spoiled little brat after 2000).

 

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)
28. But they should not speak for the Senator. I don't think he would have run again anyhow.
Sat Jan 12, 2013, 01:16 PM
Jan 2013

and to wait while the repubs amass a fortune would not do well.

This way Mayor Booker will easily get the nom, and he easily will win.
There is no republican that can run for senate and win.

Beacool

(30,250 posts)
16. I don't know if Lautenberg is planning to run for reelection.
Fri Jan 11, 2013, 11:36 PM
Jan 2013

But if he does, Does Booker plan to run against him?

Not cool............



Forgot to add, if Booker pushes Lautenberg out I refuse to vote for him.

Divine Discontent

(21,056 posts)
17. I agree! that would be really wrong. (D) Lautenberg has been pretty good from what I know, and to
Sat Jan 12, 2013, 02:46 AM
Jan 2013

have that happen to him would be very wrong. Why didn't he decide to run against Christie - a good Dem could beat him. But, then I start thinking about all this multi-level chess and whyyyyy perhaps Booker isn't running against Christie, and well, I'll just say, I agree with you!

Beacool

(30,250 posts)
21. Booker has always been very ambitious.
Sat Jan 12, 2013, 11:19 AM
Jan 2013

I'm surprised that he didn't get a spot in the Obama administration back in 2009. Booker knows that Christie is popular in the state. He is taking the easy route, trying to push out Lautenberg due to his age. The party may go along because there are no AA Democratic senators since Obama became president. But, if a good man like Lautenberg is pushed out, I will abstain to vote for Booker.

 

BluegrassDem

(1,693 posts)
19. Lautenberg needs to retire...period.
Sat Jan 12, 2013, 03:59 AM
Jan 2013

If he wins again, he'll most likely die in office and Christie will appoint a Republican. If anything, he's the one being selfish, not Booker. Lautenberg has had his time and he needs to go live out his years in retirement and give other Dems a chance.

Rowdyboy

(22,057 posts)
20. I have really mixed feelings on this one. Lautenberg is SOLID but he'll be 88 in 2014...
Sat Jan 12, 2013, 04:20 AM
Jan 2013

Rethuglican Christie can appoint his sucessor should he run and win again. I really like Booker but he isn't nearly as solidly liberal as Lautenberg and the senate will be more conservative should Booker be Lautenberg's replacement...

But then I live in Mississippi where my choices are asshole and super-asshole. I should dream of having problems like choosing between these two....

 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
22. I'm starting to see this about Cory Booker, too. First, his defense of Bain Capital really irked me.
Sat Jan 12, 2013, 11:28 AM
Jan 2013

Second, his disregard for his elder statesman leaves a bad taste in my mouth.

Someone on Facebook commented that he seems to be preparing himself for national media attention after I posted the "Booker used to hate gays" story. He is coming across as calculating and self-serving.

 

amandabeech

(9,893 posts)
33. He seems to really like Wall Street in general.
Sat Jan 12, 2013, 06:22 PM
Jan 2013

We can come up with better candidates than Booker.

But, I don't live in New Jersey anymore, and it's the people of New Jersey who will vote for him. Or not.

Blasphemer

(3,261 posts)
27. I understand respecting those who came before you but...
Sat Jan 12, 2013, 01:10 PM
Jan 2013

Cory Booker, and any one, else can choose to run whether or not Lautenberg wants to retire. It's a democracy and I am so tired of how Senate seats in particular are treated as some sort of noble right. It's not the House of Lords. No one needs permission. You can call me ageist if you'd like but I believe term limits need to be imposed because the ages at which these politicians cling to their positions of power are ridiculous. Is it any wonder that things such as changing procedural rules never happen? The Senate needs a regular infusion of fresh blood, fresh ideas and approaches that defy the status quo. We can't get that with same people hanging around for decades.

RudynJack

(1,044 posts)
29. I'm against term limits...
Sat Jan 12, 2013, 01:18 PM
Jan 2013

but common sense should tell a man not to run for the Senate when he's 90 years old.

 
30. Tell that to Strom Thurmond and Robert Byrd. Who died in office.
Sat Jan 12, 2013, 01:27 PM
Jan 2013

I firmly believe that Lautenberg, if health is good, should go ahead and run again, and get Booker to run for Governor instead.

Booker is not ready for national politics yet - he needs to work on leading New Jersey, not just Newark.

RudynJack

(1,044 posts)
31. Byrd died at 92
Sat Jan 12, 2013, 01:40 PM
Jan 2013

and missed much of his later years in the Senate due to health issues.

Thurmond was an empty shell who was wheeled out by his aides to vote.

Neither one was an effective senator.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Report: Lautenberg Aide S...