Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NickB79

(19,243 posts)
Wed Feb 6, 2013, 10:02 PM Feb 2013

Moose hunt cancelled after rapid population decline

Source: Kare11 News

ST. PAUL, Minn. - The 2013 moose hunting season was canceled by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Wednesday after an aerial survey of northeastern Minnesota showed the decline of the state's moose population is dramatically accelerating.

DNR wildlife officials announced today that the northeast population has declined 35 percent from last year. Since 2010, the moose population has declined an overall 52 percent.

In response to the survey results, the DNR will not open a 2013 state moose hunting season or consider opening future seasons unless surveys show the population is recovering.

"The state's moose population has been in decline for years but never at the precipitous rate documented this winter," said Tom Landwehr, DNR commissioner. "This is further and definitive evidence the population is not healthy. It reaffirms the conservation community's need to better understand why this iconic species of the north is disappearing from our state."

Read more: http://www.kare11.com/news/article/1009722/391/Moose-hunt-cancelled-after-rapid-population-decline



My prediction is that moose will be extinct here in MN within 20 years. The climate models are all predicting the North Woods will only get warmer and warmer as global warming accelerates.
40 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Moose hunt cancelled after rapid population decline (Original Post) NickB79 Feb 2013 OP
Prion disease? littlemissmartypants Feb 2013 #1
Chronic wasting disease? kurtzapril4 Feb 2013 #2
I was listening to a report about this earlier this evening on MPR. scarletwoman Feb 2013 #3
that seems likely to be at least part of the equation cali Feb 2013 #16
There's also speculation that the warmer winters dflprincess Feb 2013 #40
Good. nt onehandle Feb 2013 #4
Not really. Hunting isn't driving the decline NickB79 Feb 2013 #5
More restrictions . . . another_liberal Feb 2013 #11
Even though I understand the fun... SkyDaddy7 Feb 2013 #13
Hunting isn't helping if the numbers are going down CreekDog Feb 2013 #32
Not CWD Crepuscular Feb 2013 #6
No one really knows what is causing the problem happyslug Feb 2013 #8
2760 moose; 3000 wolves? FarCenter Feb 2013 #7
Poor things. lonestarnot Feb 2013 #9
And the damn fools . . . another_liberal Feb 2013 #10
That is terrible but I doubt hunting was the culprit as it is very restricted here in MN azurnoir Feb 2013 #12
Hunting is not the cause... SkyDaddy7 Feb 2013 #14
Minnesota has very strict hunting regulations azurnoir Feb 2013 #15
The snowmobilers . . . another_liberal Feb 2013 #17
In Mn most off road vehicles on state or federal land azurnoir Feb 2013 #18
Fewer available . . . another_liberal Feb 2013 #19
some of them are closed azurnoir Feb 2013 #20
That could be true . . . another_liberal Feb 2013 #27
well to be entirely honest azurnoir Feb 2013 #28
Now, now . . . another_liberal Feb 2013 #29
lol have you heard the saying that azurnoir Feb 2013 #30
No, I hadn't heard that one. another_liberal Feb 2013 #31
should go back to the federal rules nothing with a motor on most public lands Sunlei Feb 2013 #25
I agree . . . another_liberal Feb 2013 #26
whenever I hear the argument RILib Feb 2013 #21
Wolves hunting help the species by removing the weak, humans not so much . . . hatrack Feb 2013 #22
Obviously, you don't know how... SkyDaddy7 Feb 2013 #36
Do what?!?! SkyDaddy7 Feb 2013 #35
how can you support 300 permits with a population of less than 3000? CreekDog Feb 2013 #33
well that's why the hunt was canceled azurnoir Feb 2013 #34
82 moose were killed out of 300 permits issued last year NickB79 Feb 2013 #38
any species that has only 1 or 2 young a year can go extinct very fast. CWD and Fencing. Sunlei Feb 2013 #23
reply to myself..domestic dogs aswell, big problem..they chase livestock and wildlife-fences/roads. Sunlei Feb 2013 #24
I always felt bad about moose hunts. avebury Feb 2013 #37
in Maine, they've fingered the increase in ticks as a major factor magical thyme Feb 2013 #39

kurtzapril4

(1,353 posts)
2. Chronic wasting disease?
Wed Feb 6, 2013, 10:07 PM
Feb 2013

Can moose get it, too? Those are big losses in a short time frame. I'm glad they cancelled the season for the forseeable future.

scarletwoman

(31,893 posts)
3. I was listening to a report about this earlier this evening on MPR.
Wed Feb 6, 2013, 10:13 PM
Feb 2013

I kept wishing that they would say something about the moose population further north, in Canada. I'd really like to know if the moose populations in North Ontario and Manitoba are also declining, or if they're still at normal levels in their habitats north of Minnesota.

I'm strongly inclined to think that it's climate change that's doing our Minnesota moose in.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
16. that seems likely to be at least part of the equation
Thu Feb 7, 2013, 06:45 AM
Feb 2013

<snip>

One factor that may tie all of the life-threatening conditions together is warmer temperatures for an animal geared to cooler climates. With no sweat glands and a gut that has to ferment the moose’s woody diet of twigs, the animals have a hard time when temperatures reach more than 80 degrees.

<snip>

Read more: http://billingsgazette.com/lifestyles/recreation/montana-wyoming-trying-to-understand-why-moose-populations-are-plummeting/article_cf1fcb02-9699-56d8-9b34-9b297fd4dc5f.html#ixzz2KD17gq2m

dflprincess

(28,078 posts)
40. There's also speculation that the warmer winters
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 08:48 PM
Feb 2013

are not killing off enough of the parasites the moose may carry.

NickB79

(19,243 posts)
5. Not really. Hunting isn't driving the decline
Wed Feb 6, 2013, 10:37 PM
Feb 2013

Hunters only kill 2% of the population each year, and aren't a factor in the decline. The only reason they've cancelled the season is that it's the only thing they have control over, even though it makes almost no difference in the long run.

It's mostly just an indicator of how bad the collapse of MN moose populations has become, and how we have no idea how to stop it.

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
11. More restrictions . . .
Wed Feb 6, 2013, 11:35 PM
Feb 2013

More restrictions on snowmobiles and 4-wheel all-terrain vehicles would surely help. Those things are noisy, smelly and highly disruptive to natural habitats.

SkyDaddy7

(6,045 posts)
13. Even though I understand the fun...
Thu Feb 7, 2013, 05:36 AM
Feb 2013

I too agree we need to restrict snow mobiles more than we do...They are hell on wildlife!

Crepuscular

(1,057 posts)
6. Not CWD
Wed Feb 6, 2013, 10:49 PM
Feb 2013

The decline is not due to Chronic Wasting Disease, the Cervid version of prion disease. CWD is not widespread among the deer herd in Minnesota, there has only been one free ranging deer found to test positive for CWD there. The problems that the moose in MN are facing is primarily due to parasitic infestation, although brain worm probably contributes to the overall mortality, as well.

 

happyslug

(14,779 posts)
8. No one really knows what is causing the problem
Wed Feb 6, 2013, 11:14 PM
Feb 2013

Brain worm seems NOT to be a problem:
http://www.nrri.umn.edu/moose/information/brainworm.html

Ticks are a problem, and with shorter winters will become worse:
http://www.nrri.umn.edu/moose/information/WinterTick.html

Liver flukes are also a problem:
http://www.nrri.umn.edu/moose/information/LiverFluke.html

Between the late 1980s and the early 2000s the density of moose (Alces alces) in northwestern (NW) Minnesota declined precipitously because of high non-hunting mortality and low pregnancy rates. The population decline was correlated with increasing summer temperatures, although year-to-year variation was large. In northeastern (NE) Minnesota, mortality of radiocollared moose is comparable to that seen during the decline of moose in the NW. Population modeling based on mortality and fertility rates indicates a declining population. Recruitment of calves into the population is at low levels, and hunter success has declined over the past decade. These lines of evidence all suggest that the NE population is declining as well. In addition, there is anecdotal evidence of population decline: people are reporting seeing fewer moose than they used to. In response to these developments, the Minnesota State Legislature directed the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to establish a Moose Advisory Committee (MAC) that would make recommendations to the DNR and form the basis for their development of a Moose Management
and Research Plan

http://www.nrri.umn.edu/moose/information/mnmac/MAC_FINAL_ver_1.01.pdf

But Moose are EXPANDING in North Dakota:
http://www.nrri.umn.edu/moose/information/NDmoose.html

Movements into western North Dakota are unusual in one respect: moose are generally thought to be sensitive to high temperatures, and one of the conclusions arising from the northwestern Minnesota moose project was that warming temperatures were correlated with increasing moose mortality. Yet moose in North Dakota are experiencing even warmer temperatures than are seen in Minnesota.


In short no one knows, the expansion in North Dakota undermines any global warming theory.

But Global warming is still a top suspect:
http://www.nwf.org/News-and-Magazines/National-Wildlife/Animals/Archives/2007/The-Mystery-of-the-Disappearing-Moose.aspx

My guess, the shorter and warmer winters are NOT killing off enough parasites on or that live off the Moose, and thus weaken the Moose more then they did 40 years ago when temperatures were colder.
 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
10. And the damn fools . . .
Wed Feb 6, 2013, 11:30 PM
Feb 2013

And the damn fools want us to import the filthiest, most environmentally destructive petroleum available, Canadian Tar Sands Oil, pipe it to Texas for refining and then export most of it to the huge energy markets of the Far East. Thank you Koch brothers, you idiots!

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
12. That is terrible but I doubt hunting was the culprit as it is very restricted here in MN
Wed Feb 6, 2013, 11:53 PM
Feb 2013

only I believe 300 permits are issued a year and it is done by lottery and is considered a 'once in a lifetime permit' in other words you can only get 1 permit in your life

SkyDaddy7

(6,045 posts)
14. Hunting is not the cause...
Thu Feb 7, 2013, 05:40 AM
Feb 2013

Where did you hear that? They cancelled the hunt because obviously the herd does not need that added stress. I use to be a hunter & most of us hunters are the original environmentalist...If it were not for hunters the herds would be in far worse shape. Just like wolves, hunters are a much needed balance when herds are healthy. If the herds are not healthy then there is no need for hunters so the call to cancel the season makes perfect sense.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
15. Minnesota has very strict hunting regulations
Thu Feb 7, 2013, 05:48 AM
Feb 2013

and the moose hunt is by lottery only and considered a once in a life time experience and I believe that only 300 permits are issued a year which was I said hunting is not the culprit here

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
17. The snowmobilers . . .
Thu Feb 7, 2013, 09:28 AM
Feb 2013

The snowmobilers need to be kept out of wilderness areas, and the four-wheel all terrain vehicles also. Those things are loud, smelly and can devastate wildlife habitats. The moose are most likely too busy fleeing the perceived danger to bother finding a mate or raising their young.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
18. In Mn most off road vehicles on state or federal land
Thu Feb 7, 2013, 09:34 AM
Feb 2013

are restricted to designated trails

http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/ohv/index.html

everything here concerning wilderness areas and forests is very strictly controlled

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
19. Fewer available . . .
Thu Feb 7, 2013, 09:42 AM
Feb 2013

Fewer available trails, then, would be the way to proceed. It's hard to overestimate the impact of those vehicles on wildlife.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
20. some of them are closed
Thu Feb 7, 2013, 09:46 AM
Feb 2013

I was talking to someone about this and it was suggested that the resurgent wolf population may be playing a role although not the sole cause

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
27. That could be true . . .
Thu Feb 7, 2013, 01:02 PM
Feb 2013

That could be true, especially if the animals are worn-out and highly stressed from being chased by wingnuts on snowmobiles. You may have to choose between placating the off-road enthusiasts and saving your moose. I hope you choose the latter.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
28. well to be entirely honest
Thu Feb 7, 2013, 04:36 PM
Feb 2013

I can easily chose the latter because although I've lived most of life in Minnesota I have never been on a snowmobile and I'm not Scandinavian either

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
25. should go back to the federal rules nothing with a motor on most public lands
Thu Feb 7, 2013, 11:14 AM
Feb 2013

States laws are not enough, as so many states are corrupt to their lobbyists interests.

Some idiots chase wildlife. In winter nothing is worse/more stressfull for domestic or wildlife to run off winter fat reserves, be terrorised.

In summertime, in drought areas people will drive those ATVs and their cars! off the paths and spark fires. Some remote desert areas are so fragile, easy to damage we can still see tracks from wagon wheels.

Lobbyists have chipped away on protections for our public lands. That land and those wildlife belong to all us Americans.

 

RILib

(862 posts)
21. whenever I hear the argument
Thu Feb 7, 2013, 09:59 AM
Feb 2013

that hunting helps a species by removing the weak, I wonder when hunters are going to offer their services to the local hospitals to thin out the patient population.

hatrack

(59,587 posts)
22. Wolves hunting help the species by removing the weak, humans not so much . . .
Thu Feb 7, 2013, 10:07 AM
Feb 2013

Many (though not all) hunters tend to pick the biggest bulls if they're going for trophies. Not surprisingly, this doesn't particularly help the species, since males in prime reproductive years get culled regularly.

Naturally, other hunters may not care if they're just getting their meat for the winter, but there's that tendency to pick the "biggest and baddest" individuals as targets.

SkyDaddy7

(6,045 posts)
36. Obviously, you don't know how...
Fri Feb 8, 2013, 07:24 AM
Feb 2013

properly managed hunts are conducted. There are countless ways to manage a heard or population of wildlife & there are always wildlife biologist who decide how this should be done. (How many of each sex can be shot & the minimum size of males, etc.,) Herds are managed first & foremost for the health of the overall population but herds can also be managed to produce trophy animals while maintaining the health of the herd.

Plus, shooting the "biggest & baddest" is so much harder than anyone who has never tried to hunt/monitor/photograph wildlife could possibly imagine.

Again, state populations are monitored by wildlife biologists to ensure the health of the herd...This is precisely why the hunt was cancelled. Some hunts require hunters to bring their kill to the on site biologist so they can remove jawbones & do a battery of test on them to monitor for disease, etc.,

If hunts were simply start killing anything you want on this date then there would be no hunting before long because there would be nothing to hunt.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
33. how can you support 300 permits with a population of less than 3000?
Thu Feb 7, 2013, 09:21 PM
Feb 2013

how can any sensible person support that?

when a species is on the brink, hunting at previous levels, which previously may not have been harmful, could be devastating to a small population.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
34. well that's why the hunt was canceled
Fri Feb 8, 2013, 12:57 AM
Feb 2013

because the moose population is so low, in the past though it was one moose per permit I think, and not all 300 issued were going to bag a moose either. From what I've been told it's no easy trick moose prefer boggy swampy areas and they weight a lot, adult males 1500lbs and females 1000lbs once you shoot one you have to get it out, I've been told that requires a heavy duty 4 wheel drive type vehicle with winch or something close to that. All in all it's not as easy as deer hunting

NickB79

(19,243 posts)
38. 82 moose were killed out of 300 permits issued last year
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 10:16 AM
Feb 2013

Per the local news reports.

Plus, since they only issue permits for males (and moose don't pair up), removing them likely had no impact on population numbers.

The moose are breeding well; that's been established by reports of numerous calves every spring. The main problem is that the young aren't making it through to adulthood.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
23. any species that has only 1 or 2 young a year can go extinct very fast. CWD and Fencing.
Thu Feb 7, 2013, 10:28 AM
Feb 2013

Lack of enough range,fencing and cattle guards have a huge effect on- especially the young.

An adult can jump a fence, young get caught up in barbed wire. Or worse, a person I know did pictures of a moose and her 2 babies born in their yard. They watched them for about a week. Then the mother moved on hopped the back fence..babies tried to follow and hop the fence..both got belly impaled on the steel posts.

Seen plenty of pictures of the remains of wildlife that tried to walk across those on the ground cattle guards and they break their legs.

Even our BLM when they round-up wild horses. They use helicoptors to panic and run the horses. They run them right over cattle guards and have their ground crew use chain saws to cut off the legs of horses that get stuck in cattle guards.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
24. reply to myself..domestic dogs aswell, big problem..they chase livestock and wildlife-fences/roads.
Thu Feb 7, 2013, 10:30 AM
Feb 2013

avebury

(10,952 posts)
37. I always felt bad about moose hunts.
Fri Feb 8, 2013, 08:30 AM
Feb 2013

Several years ago they started limited moose hunts in Maine and it was like shooting fish in a barrel. If you were lucky enough to get a permit it was not all the difficult to get a moose. There are certain places where you can sit and wait for a moose to come along (like logging roads) and just wait for one to come along. They had never developed any wariness of people and hunters. I have been gone from Maine for quite a few years so I don't know what it is like now. But back then it just didn't seem very sporting.

 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
39. in Maine, they've fingered the increase in ticks as a major factor
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 06:29 PM
Feb 2013

in declining moose populationsThe warmer winters here have enabled ticks to flourish. I can't remember how many ticks they were finding on moose now, but it was easily in the thousands. Baby moose here are severely weakened and dying literally due to loss of blood to ticks!

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Moose hunt cancelled afte...