Iran claims released footage is from downed U.S. drone
Source: CNN
The black and white aerial footage, Iran claims was from a RQ-170 spy plane, was aired by Iranian news agencies and placed on YouTube.
...
Iran had said it downed the drone on December 4, 2011 near Kashmar in the country's northeast, some 225 kilometers (140 miles) from the border with Afghanistan.
Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2013/02/07/world/meast/iran-drone-video/index.html
Iran has posted the footage to YouTube. It is also available at link.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)I wouldn't have been so open about it, and I would have let Carney field that one.
Now what happens when the Iranians want to declare a drone assassinate one of its citizens? How will it look when the US denies it?
Whether it is true or not, the assassination, how would it look to then deny such an event having previously owned up to this?
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)bananas
(27,509 posts)PressTVGlobalNews
Published on Feb 7, 2013
Iran has for the first time released decoded video recordings obtained from a US RQ-170 Sentinel stealth drone downed and captured by the Islamic Republic in December 2011.
<snip>
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)that the Iranians managed to "capture" one of these drones in the first place! Once this thing was hijacked it should have automatically self-destructed. It should have ended it's time with the Iranians scouring many square miles of Iran for the tiny bits of aftermath from an internal explosive device.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)they can also destroy them as well.
I'm sure that the USA is figuring out counter measures as you specify, but how is one to stop that if an enemy can hijack a drone and turn off any countermeasures?
This is hi-tech tech warfare, and the players are all becoming more sophisticated at it.
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)and then - on whatever flight duration it had left - were able to decipher said "countermeasures" we have MUCH to fear of our Iranian foe!
There should be a totally un-integrated self destruct system that could be set off independent of the main control systems.
hack89
(39,171 posts)it is much more likely it crashed due to a mechanical malfunction - drones, especially new models, have a poor reliability record.
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)built-in provisions to self-immolate. If it DID crash, they sure did a great job of reconstructing it for display.
hack89
(39,171 posts)how do you know that what they put on display actually were the remnants of a US drone. It doesn't take much to put together a fiberglass mold.
We didn't get pics of the F-117 and the SR-71 til well after the first of them had flown.
hack89
(39,171 posts)Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)Consider if you will, that there wasn't strong denial or refute from the USA. One risks looking dumber if down the road one has to back track.
I have to wonder WHAT is the purpose of cloaking the underside of the displayed drone. I understand the questions that raises. Again tho - there was little protest from the US.
KurtNYC
(14,549 posts)Also it is speculated that the RQ-170 does not have a self-destruct option.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-02-07/iran-releases-footage-hacked-us-drone
hack89
(39,171 posts)I was just questioning whether what they put on display was the actual wreckage they recovered. That's all.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)Archae
(46,327 posts)It's footage taken by a camera in an airliner and from a car, on a road.
Robb
(39,665 posts)...avoiding such absurd conventions as time and range stamps, and eschewing so-called "useful" things like focus and high resolution.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)another level. It's good we're sparing our own military recruit, jobless teenagers the tacky death and destruction of the real-life killing fields with our new video game air toy. Why, some kids will barely know the difference.
The American Empire, like all others, has a shelf time. I just pray it isn't in my, or my son's, time.