Kerry: Budget Cuts May Force Reduction In Israel Aid
Source: REUTERS
Automatic spending cuts set to take effect in the US next month could "lead to reductions in military assistance to Israel, Jordan and Egypt, undermining our commitment to their security at such a volatile time," US Secretary of State John Kerry said in comments publicized on Thursday.
Across-the-board cuts, known as "sequestration," set to begin on March 1, would take $2.6 billion out of the budget for the US State Department and USAID, America's development assistance agency, Kerry said.
"Cuts of this magnitude would seriously impair our ability to execute our vital missions of national security, diplomacy and development," he wrote in a letter to Senator Barbara Mikulski, chairwoman of the Senate Committee on Appropriations.
The warning from Kerry, who took over from predecessor Hillary Clinton 10 days ago, follows similarly stark alerts from Pentagon chief Leon Panetta and other Obama administration officials over cuts that will take place unless lawmakers and US President Barack Obama reach an agreement to stop them.
Read more: http://www.jpost.com/DiplomacyAndPolitics/Article.aspx?id=303430
Boo-fucking-hoo! Why are the US taxpayer subsidizing this apartheid like state to begin with?
littlemissmartypants
(22,692 posts)GET OVER IT.
WCGreen
(45,558 posts)Taking Americans tax money to allow Israel, Jordan and Egypt buy stuff from US arms manufacturing.
kooljerk666
(776 posts)started out as a "Farm Subsidy".
At any rate they can suck it up & tighten their belts & any other austerity cheer anyone can think of.
Oh and all military cuts to everyone is a-ok (xcept health care to vets) is fine with me.
Hey DOD suckers! Fat white festering suckers of tax money! There is a shortage of OTR truck drivers. Get in to school asap & suffer like every one else. Most of the folk making money off DOD are more like Reagans "Caddy driving welfare queens", than any other real life example AFAIAC.
What comes to mind is a real old song "get a job".
frylock
(34,825 posts)Journeyman
(15,036 posts)From Wikipedia (I know, lousy source, but the point remains valid):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care_in_Israel
I guess we could have nice things, too, if someone else paid a chunk of our military budget.
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)That would be just too bad......................Perhaps just a tiny silver lining in the sequestration cloud.
BVictor1
(229 posts)''What have you done for me lately?'' comes to mind.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Now any Republican who goes along with the idea of the sequester is anti-Israel.
helveticas
(35 posts)Igel
(35,320 posts)Everybody against sequestration is now pro-apartheid.
We've just divided the US political spectrum into two camps of racists.
Not that some people aren't already long-term members of that pecular kind of mental prison camp already, as evidenced by an earlier post in this thread.
blm
(113,065 posts).
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)TomClash
(11,344 posts)However will they live? Oh wait, there is some land left to steal in Palestine . . .
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)TomClash
(11,344 posts)As if Morocco, Saudi Arabia, Palestine and Lebanon are all the same.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)the Irish and Scottish? What about all the Celtic peoples? Aren't they exactly the same?
The truly sad thing is that this is part of the whole dehumanizing of the Palestinians, other Arabic peoples, or just people of color in general.
They are considered lesser and inferior persons of not much worth.
Anybody that thinks this way is fucked up.
TomClash
(11,344 posts). . . and eventually cleanse in Palestine.
How heroic.
another_liberal
(8,821 posts)We're going to have to cut our aid to Israel? Oh, I'm sure that's going to happen. When swine soar high among the puffy clouds it will!
Every soldier and sailor in the U.S. military will have to get by on two meals a day and just one shoe apiece before that is ever going to happen.
Who ever knew Kerry was such a comedian?
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)we are no longer going to pay your war bills.
earthside
(6,960 posts)Frankly, I'm finding this sequestration plan a good avenue for helping to get our federal priorities in order.
My hunch is that the immediate pain of social programs reductions will make Washington rectify those cuts rather quickly. In the mean time, the rest of the country may discover that cuts to the military and things like cuts in aid to Israel are not as critical as some special interests have led many to believe.
It had better! Given that we would be cutting science, disease prevention and study, environmental protection, our bloated OWN military, and may other things, aid to the Israelis should be cut at least as much as other programs. If it is protected from sequester cuts there should be hell to pay.
B-ONE Lancer
(15 posts)THE BELOW INFORMATION COMES FROM "THINK PROGRESS"'. AND I THINK EVERYONE SHOULD GET AND READ DAVID CAY JOHNSTONS BOOK CALLED " THE FINE PRINT", IT IS AMAZING.
AND EVERY YEAR WE THE POOR / MIDDLE CLASS HAVE TO SUBSIDIZE THE "JOB CREATORS" WHO ARE FUCKING CRIMINAL'S AND THERE BEHAVIOUR OF PARKING TAXES DUE ON OFF SHORE ACCOUNTS AND HAVING FUCKING LOBBISTISTS DESTROY THE WAGES AND THE WORKING CONDITIONS OF THE POOR / MIDDLE CLASS BY MAKING LAWS TO "SCREW" US MORE , AND THIS IS WHY I DON'T HAVE A FUCKING FACEBOOK ACCOUNT, THAT LITTLE TWERP A****LE SUPPORTED MITT ROMNEY.
SO WHAT DID LEVIN DO.
DID HE BRING FORTH ANOTHER BILL TO STOP THIS SCAM, OR DID HE WORRY ABOUT THE WORTHLESS FILIBUSTER RULE THAT THE SPINELESS REID SHOOK HANDS WITH GOOD OLD TURTLE LIPS MCCONNELL---WHICH HE, LEVIN FOUGHT AGAINST THE REFORM TO THE FILIBUSTER DEBACLE---HOWS THAT GOING BOYS--ASK HAGAEL AND OBAMA AND WHICH IS NOT AND I REPEAT NOT IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL FORM OF GOVERNMENT AND DID HE LEVIN BRING FORTH ONE BILL OR SIGN ON AS CO-SPONSOR TO THE BERNIE SANDERS OR GO INTO THE WELL OF THE SENATE AND STAND SHOULDER TO SHOULDER WITH SANDERS ON THIS LEGISLATION TO QUIT THE BELOW BULLSHIT---DON'T THINK SO.
JOHN STEWART HAS IT RIGHT--WHERE IS THE MEDIA---NOWHERE.
Between 2008 and 2011, 26 major corporations were able to pay no federal corporate income tax, despite making a combined $205 billion in profits. According to a new report from Citizens for Tax Justice, Facebook joined that illustrious club last year, receiving $429 million in tax rebates despite making more than $1 billion in profits:
Earlier this month, the Facebook Inc. released its first 10-K annual financial report since going public last year. Hidden in the reports footnotes is an amazing admission: despite $1.1 billion in U.S. profits in 2012, Facebook did not pay even a dime in federal and state income taxes.
Instead, Facebook says it will receive net tax refunds totaling $429 million.
Facebooks income tax refunds stem from the companys use of a single tax break, the tax deductibility of executive stock options. That tax break reduced Facebooks federal and state income taxes by $1,033 million in 2012, including refunds of earlier years taxes of $451 million
Facebook will be able to carry further tax rebates forward, according to CTJ, for a total of $3 billion in tax deductions.
When profitable corporations can use the stock option tax deduction to pay zero corporate income taxes for years on end, average taxpayers are forced to pick up the tax burden, said Sen. Carl Levin (D-MI) when this issue arose as Facebook was preparing its initial public offering last year. This tax preference for corporations costs the U.S. about $2 billion in revenue per year.
Trillo
(9,154 posts)JFYI, capitals are harder to read than non capital letters, and I generally skip them (I don't know what others do). You probably make some good points.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Odin2005
(53,521 posts)R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)It is clearly a belligerent, colonial, apartheid state.
Mason Kennedy
(62 posts)Isn't our economy weak?
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)Watch the GOP scream bloody murder over this one.