AP: Obama considers urging the Supreme Court to overturn California’s ban on gay marriage
Source: Associated Press
The Obama administration is quietly considering urging the Supreme Court to overturn California's ban on gay marriage, a step that would mark a political victory for advocates of same-sex unions and a deepening commitment by President Barack Obama to rights for gay couples.
... The administration has until Feb. 28 to intervene in the case by filing a "friend of the court" brief.
... A final decision on whether to file a brief has not been made, a senior administration official said. Solicitor General Donald Verrilli is consulting with the White House on the matter, said the official, speaking only on condition of anonymity because the official was not authorized to address the private deliberations publicly.
... Ahead of next week's deadline, nearly two dozen states have filed briefs with the Supreme Court asking the Justices to uphold the California measure.
Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/obama-considers-weighing-supreme-court-gay-marriage-case-article-1.1269384
iandhr
(6,852 posts)When you stand up and do the right thing the American people respond to you.
meti57b
(3,584 posts)There isn't any valid argument against gay marriage. There's just blind prejudice.
BVictor1
(229 posts)I mean, it's in the news that they're considering, but the word is out.
It's being reported on.
yardwork
(61,690 posts)I'm sure that my state is one of them.
The country is deeply divided along states' rights lines.
alp227
(32,045 posts)Most of not all former confederate states have had Prop 8 type laws long before california passed p8. Also are right to work states & allow employment discrimination on sexual orientation. I say let them secede if they wish to value discrimination in the name of "family values" and ignore the 14th amendment.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publications/supreme_court_preview/briefs-v2/12-144_pet_amcu_merits_soi-etal.authcheckdam.pdf
http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publications/supreme_court_preview/briefs-v2/12-144_pet_amcu_mi.authcheckdam.pdf
alp227
(32,045 posts)Link 3 is Michigan's AC brief; Michigan's current AG is a Republican. Same with its neighbor across Lake Michigan, Wisconsin; J.B. Van Hollen has aggressively sued to defend his state's voter ID laws as well.
The ex-Confederate states that did NOT file AC's in defense of P8: Arkansas (Democratic AG), Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi (Dem AG), N. Carolina (Dem AG), and Tennessee (which has a Democratic AG). The AG of Indiana led this bunch of states that weren't Michigan. Looking at the list these states all have Republican AG's and (except CO and VA and WI) went for Romney in the last election.
Ash_F
(5,861 posts)NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)Just do it.
forestpath
(3,102 posts)efhmc
(14,731 posts)slackmaster
(60,567 posts)That doesn't mean the SC will pay any attention to it.
efhmc
(14,731 posts)difference being made.