Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

antigop

(12,778 posts)
Tue Mar 5, 2013, 10:16 PM Mar 2013

IBM Moving Hundreds of Manufacturing Jobs to Mexico

Source: KTTC.COM

A shock for people working at IBM's sprawling campus in northwest Rochester Tuesday, as IBM executives shared a decision with workers that hundreds of manufacturing jobs are moving to Guadalajara, Mexico.

IBM is a global computer giant with twelve research laboratories around the world and manufacturing and support plants and offices in dozens of countries. In recent years, there have been other such "resource actions" with the company shifting jobs to China, India or other parts of its "smarter planet."

Scott Cook, an IBM spokesman based in Chicago, confirmed the Rochester cuts to KTTC NewsCenter and says the decisions announced Tuesday are simply about creating the "best possible infrastructure" for the company.

Read more: http://www.kttc.com/story/21527579/2013/03/05/ibm-moving-hundreds-of-jobs-to-mexico

34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
IBM Moving Hundreds of Manufacturing Jobs to Mexico (Original Post) antigop Mar 2013 OP
O wonderfull. Not enough IT serfs here? Free market capitalism ...God bless America. n/t L0oniX Mar 2013 #1
this "best possible infrastructure" BS line is embarrassing for them to say... Divine Discontent Mar 2013 #2
yup; as embarassing as calling them TALENTED Skittles Mar 2013 #14
This is crazy sikofit3 Mar 2013 #21
And get a tax break for doing so. yourout Mar 2013 #3
So let me get this straight... ChromeFoundry Mar 2013 #4
"The company will not divulge numbers of workers negatively affected...." OhioChick Mar 2013 #5
Boycott, anyone? Indyfan53 Mar 2013 #6
They don't make computers Tempest Mar 2013 #17
I get the HR e-mails about those IBM jobs. Fat Bastard Mar 2013 #7
you should be paid 7 figures for putting up with offshore nitwittery Skittles Mar 2013 #19
My former colleague supernova Mar 2013 #27
how many usa dollars tax break will they get to make sure less people are employed here 2Design Mar 2013 #8
Just what the local economy here in Rochester needs... Earth_First Mar 2013 #9
How many tax and other waivers have they extorted from the city and state to operate there? freshwest Mar 2013 #16
Rochester, Minnesota, not New York. Thor_MN Mar 2013 #20
No problemo. I'll edit. Same pattern all over the country, though. freshwest Mar 2013 #24
not just the tax breaks, there is probably a huge loss of local tax revenues going away. Sunlei Mar 2013 #34
That's it! I'm moving to Mexico to get a good job! Pterodactyl Mar 2013 #10
Maybe you can get a "pathway to citizenship" too? xtraxritical Mar 2013 #11
: ) Pterodactyl Mar 2013 #12
I wonder if the Mayo Clinic can use this Mnpaul Mar 2013 #13
Perhaps if we are just more patient with the 3-dimensional chess master. AnotherMcIntosh Mar 2013 #15
Maquiladoras (pay $7.00 a day) Guadalajara, Mexico. IBM had plans from 2009 to move more there. Sunlei Mar 2013 #18
Almost 290,000 jobs from USA companies in that list Blandocyte Mar 2013 #26
yes and that was years ago, thats where all the basic work jobs went. To people who work for 7 a day Sunlei Mar 2013 #30
It's not that IBM wants to move, but they just can't find R. Daneel Olivaw Mar 2013 #22
You forgot the sarcasm tag supernova Mar 2013 #31
Did I need one? R. Daneel Olivaw Mar 2013 #33
Wow, I spent 3 years as a first-line manager at Rochester. Only plant site sinkingfeeling Mar 2013 #23
Rochester was always supernova Mar 2013 #28
I also spent years at Raleigh. I retired from IBM in 2003, so don't know who's who anymore. sinkingfeeling Mar 2013 #29
The two ladies I worked supernova Mar 2013 #32
IBM laid me off 3 times supernova Mar 2013 #25

Divine Discontent

(21,056 posts)
2. this "best possible infrastructure" BS line is embarrassing for them to say...
Tue Mar 5, 2013, 10:31 PM
Mar 2013
it's about this, and nothing else



sikofit3

(145 posts)
21. This is crazy
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 09:06 AM
Mar 2013

If we have already been manufacturing here for IBM don't we already have the infrastructure and shouldn't it be up to be par? They will never admit their crimes, they will just lie to us like my five year old does....

ChromeFoundry

(3,270 posts)
4. So let me get this straight...
Tue Mar 5, 2013, 10:43 PM
Mar 2013

Mexico now has better schools than the US, and since they can't get enough H-1b visa into the US to fill these high tech jobs.. they are moving to Mexico, because there is such a deep well of talent in these areas of technology that just cannot be found here in the US?

Are they rearranging the chairs on the deck yet?

Indyfan53

(473 posts)
6. Boycott, anyone?
Tue Mar 5, 2013, 10:49 PM
Mar 2013

Looks like I won't be buying a computer from International Bowel Movements anytime soon.

Tempest

(14,591 posts)
17. They don't make computers
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 03:52 AM
Mar 2013

They're completely out of the hardware business.

So unless you're a Fortune 500 company using their enterprise services, there's not much you can do.

 

Fat Bastard

(47 posts)
7. I get the HR e-mails about those IBM jobs.
Tue Mar 5, 2013, 10:52 PM
Mar 2013

I am refusing ALL IBM jobs unless they stop contracting out and hire them to be actual employees of IBM.

I know of only *one* guy that works for IBM as an employee in the IT industry, and it's torture for him (he has to be on-call for around the world)

supernova

(39,345 posts)
27. My former colleague
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 11:46 AM
Mar 2013

who still works at IBM, this is her narrative.

She started working there a year after me. We met at my second IBM stint. I started in that dept in 2004, she in 2005, early. We got along great and enjoyed working together.

She posted on FB about a couple of weeks ago that they finally, FINALLY, made her a permanent IBM employee. After SEVEN YEARS of contracting.

Oi. I congratulated her of course. But wow. I really feel like I was climbing the futility pole.

Earth_First

(14,910 posts)
9. Just what the local economy here in Rochester needs...
Tue Mar 5, 2013, 10:58 PM
Mar 2013

IBM is about the LAST large manufacturing employer in the area.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
16. How many tax and other waivers have they extorted from the city and state to operate there?
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 01:39 AM
Mar 2013

Rochester and MN should demand that money back to create other employment. It's something that people don't consider in a negative light when they see the jobs and dollars coming in. But these companies do this, make a deal to get breaks that cost municipalities and states. More and more they walk away leaving those areas holding the bag, for pollution, lost jobs and a dislocated working force.

 

Thor_MN

(11,843 posts)
20. Rochester, Minnesota, not New York.
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 08:50 AM
Mar 2013

Sorry to be a thread killer, since this is happening in "flyover" country.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
34. not just the tax breaks, there is probably a huge loss of local tax revenues going away.
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 12:35 PM
Mar 2013

The locals should demand the facility, buildings and the grounds be left to the local community to use as they wish. Who knows though?, someone may have been just leasing the lands to IBM and they could be a private land owner.
Minn. may have only benefited from the jobs and the taxes IBM paid local if any.

Out here just outside Houston, last year TI closed a huge facility. The tax revenues that stopped were a 30% revenue loss to the local community.

Minn. may have to take a look at what IBM tax revenues were actually paying for locally and statewide and cut those.

Mnpaul

(3,655 posts)
13. I wonder if the Mayo Clinic can use this
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 12:41 AM
Mar 2013

They are planning a huge expansion. This might fit their needs

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
18. Maquiladoras (pay $7.00 a day) Guadalajara, Mexico. IBM had plans from 2009 to move more there.
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 06:34 AM
Mar 2013

Mexico,- IBM will invest US$20 million in a strategy named Project XIV, which purpose is maximizing high-tech manufacturing capacities in their Guadalajara Informatics Campus.

“In IBM we are very proud to announce this important investment in Mexico, because it increases exports from this country, promotes Mexican talent, makes this Campus more visible to the world and reinforces the experience obtained throughout 34 years of existence”, Hugo A. Santana Londoño, President and CEO 7 December 09

take a look at the top 100 companies http://www.maquilaportal.com/index.php/page/top100.html

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
30. yes and that was years ago, thats where all the basic work jobs went. To people who work for 7 a day
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 12:03 PM
Mar 2013

can't compete with that and those products most are sold to Americans.

Somehow they don't even have to pay any import taxes when products ship from mexico border factories into the USA.

 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
22. It's not that IBM wants to move, but they just can't find
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 10:36 AM
Mar 2013

enough qualified candidates to work for for less $ and commute six thousand miles per day.

sinkingfeeling

(51,457 posts)
23. Wow, I spent 3 years as a first-line manager at Rochester. Only plant site
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 11:06 AM
Mar 2013

I'd ever seen with electrical plugs in some of the parking lots to keep cars warm.

supernova

(39,345 posts)
28. Rochester was always
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 11:52 AM
Mar 2013

the place where layoffs didn't happen.

We in RTP would regularly shed jobs, but Rochester just didn't move. They were safe, or so we thought. I wonder of some upper mgmt type for that plant got the heave ho or fell out of favor.

supernova

(39,345 posts)
32. The two ladies I worked
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 12:13 PM
Mar 2013

with from 2004-2006 I think are still there. I wrote about one of them above.

They have masters degrees and I didn't, though. I was a far better writer/editor than one them. I was always willing to go back to school to get my grad degree but kept getting laid off. And who wants to take on student debt without the means to pay it back? Catch 22.

edit: typo fixed.

supernova

(39,345 posts)
25. IBM laid me off 3 times
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 11:38 AM
Mar 2013

in the 2000s. No more. I work for myself now.

I no longer believe corporate america is where the US's best and brightest should focus their energies.

Edit: My job functions were moved to India. I wrote documentation.

Edit 2: Forgot to mention during that time 1999-2008, my salary flattened after 2004. No raises, despite superior work. The dept was always crying that they didn't have any money for anything, I mean down to don't take too many pens from the supply cabinet. That's when I realized that:

pay =/= work achievement

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»IBM Moving Hundreds of Ma...