What is the equipment to do this?

Helicopters? Drones? GPS?

Seems like all of it is dual purpose military uses.

It's too dangerous to send out an Ambulance. Many medics have been killed trying to rescue wounded civilians.

That term is usaully reserved for people who are lost, not wounded on a battlefield.

Pulling a wounded civilian off the street, under fire is a rescue. Looking for them is a search.

It seems you don't agree with the premise of Armored Vehicles, but think of it as an unarmed Ambulance with Armor.

Sounds like total BS now. An "armored ambulance"?

Putting a red crescent on it doesn't magically turn an armored vehicle into anything other then a armored troop carrier.

Seems most casualties are transported via personal vehicle, they don't have time to call a "armored ambulance".

Sure, an Ambulance with Armor to protect the Medics and patients from indiscriminate Sniper fire. What's wrong with that?

Like this:

http://www.lascointl.com/doors/rescue.htm

Seems the "rebels" are more prone to using it as a military vehicle to carry out terrorist activities.

Why should I waste my time trying to explain to someone that has their mind made-up, regardless of what I day or do?

That is all. Good bye.

What you are proposing is ludiacris.

If what you propose is for the "good of the people", why didn't the US give "armored ambulances" to Iraqis or Afghanis?

These people can turn night into day.

..