Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bay Boy

(1,689 posts)
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 08:00 PM Mar 2013

Ariz. Couple Sues Walmart Over Kids’ Bath Photos

Last edited Sat Mar 9, 2013, 08:38 PM - Edit history (1)

Source: ABC News

In 2008, Lisa and Anthony “A.J.” Demaree took their three young daughters on a trip to San Diego. They returned home to Arizona and brought photos of their then 5, 4 and 1 1/2 year old daughters to a local Walmart in Peoria to be developed.

The police, in turn, called in the Arizona Child Protective Services Agency, and the couple lost custody of their daughters for over a month.

In 2009, the couple sued the city of Peoria and the State Attorney General’s office for defamation. They also sued Walmart for failing to tell them that they had an “unsuitable print policy” and could turn over photos to law enforcement without the customer’s knowledge.


Read more: http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/business/2013/03/ariz-couple-sues-walmart-over-kids-bath-photos/



-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not sure exactly what the pictures consisted of but I'm not sure their beef is with Walmart.
39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ariz. Couple Sues Walmart Over Kids’ Bath Photos (Original Post) Bay Boy Mar 2013 OP
Looks more like a problem with over zealous cops than a problem with Walmart... Kalidurga Mar 2013 #1
So if you worked there would you have reported these INNOCENT photos? alp227 Mar 2013 #32
Just happened to watch segment (hardly ever watch ABC News) and they were Hestia Mar 2013 #2
I'm not sure those Bay Boy Mar 2013 #4
Child protective services are zealots and see themselves as seldom, if ever, wrong. Igel Mar 2013 #20
What in the world prompted you to have this... Bay Boy Mar 2013 #24
It's called the "rice bowl". "Authorities" are out of control in the USA. xtraxritical Mar 2013 #27
Clarify "fight like a demon." alp227 Mar 2013 #33
I suppose it's something embarrassing Bay Boy Mar 2013 #37
Having worked as a CPS caseworker for five years... LanternWaste Mar 2013 #39
clearly the cops haven't watched America's Funniest Home Videos PatrynXX Mar 2013 #14
you can still get pictures developed? d_r Mar 2013 #3
Well thank goodness for digital cameras and computers. proud2BlibKansan Mar 2013 #5
What happens customerserviceguy Mar 2013 #7
They can do that already. proud2BlibKansan Mar 2013 #8
Then you see the problem customerserviceguy Mar 2013 #11
be careful that your bluetooth isn't on PatrynXX Mar 2013 #16
uh.... PatrynXX Mar 2013 #15
I don't print out my pictures. proud2BlibKansan Mar 2013 #18
Are you kidding me? Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Mar 2013 #6
Heck. On summer days my mom would put my brother and I in a washtub on the back porch. appleannie1 Mar 2013 #9
The beef with Walmart is that adieu Mar 2013 #10
what if they were nudist or practicing naturism? lunasun Mar 2013 #12
as far as nudist children on a nudist site PatrynXX Mar 2013 #17
explained alot thanx lunasun Mar 2013 #22
What about moving the pics off the site Bay Boy Mar 2013 #26
There's already a huge thread on this here... Ian David Mar 2013 #13
Except that one went way off topic Bay Boy Mar 2013 #19
You know, I once thought of this scenario as a possible subject for satire Jack Rabbit Mar 2013 #21
Moral---never shop at Walmart. McCamy Taylor Mar 2013 #23
CPS although good, tends to overreact at atime. Lobo27 Mar 2013 #25
I think that the film processing labs wherever Smilo Mar 2013 #28
June Cleaver could have gotten busted! pacalo Mar 2013 #29
Well, a naked beaver may raise eyebrows Blandocyte Mar 2013 #30
Walmart management style is very concerning.... midnight Mar 2013 #31
It's not concerning so much as malevolent. (nt) Posteritatis Mar 2013 #34
Yes.... midnight Mar 2013 #38
2009 folks .. why are we hearing about this now? YOHABLO Mar 2013 #35
They originally sued in 2009. Dr. Strange Mar 2013 #36

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
1. Looks more like a problem with over zealous cops than a problem with Walmart...
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 08:07 PM
Mar 2013

As an employee it is better to be safe than sorry. Especially if you could lose your job for not reporting. But, any police officer should have been able to tell those photos were innocent.

alp227

(32,025 posts)
32. So if you worked there would you have reported these INNOCENT photos?
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 05:09 PM
Mar 2013

Even if risking ruining the family's life and contributing to the hyper-criminalization of America?

 

Hestia

(3,818 posts)
2. Just happened to watch segment (hardly ever watch ABC News) and they were
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 08:08 PM
Mar 2013

very innocent pictures of the girls in towels sitting on a bathmat smiling at the camera. Very innocent pics.

Bay Boy

(1,689 posts)
4. I'm not sure those
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 08:17 PM
Mar 2013

were the ones that caused the alert.

But why would it take 30 days of lost custody to determine that the
parents were innocent of wrong doing?

Igel

(35,309 posts)
20. Child protective services are zealots and see themselves as seldom, if ever, wrong.
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 10:13 PM
Mar 2013

They assume that they're the last defense for kids. Only bad people can possibly lose their kids to protective services.

In many cases, the assumptions are true. But the assumptions hold even if the parents are decent and a mistake was made in perceptions. In some cases the laws are worded badly. In most cases protective services workers are overworked and barely competent.

I've seen them screw up in ways that make this case, if it is as it's reported, seem absurdly trivial. In those cases they were held blameless. In some cases they plausibly had the best interests of the children at heart, whoever mean spirited and ill-advised their actions and statements. In others there's a faceless bureaucracy and pinning the blame for screwing over a kid on any one person is impossible.

By age 7 we'd trained our kid to fight like a demon if a child protective services person tried to take him anywhere, unless he was told we'd both died or he actually wanted to be away from us. Then he was to refuse to go anywhere unless his "aunt" or nana told him so on the phone. He learned his "aunt's" name and phone number and his nana's phone number. His grandmother knows who gets custody of him if we die. Paperwork's all in place.

Protective services are a necessary evil. They often do less bad than horrible parents. Sometimes they just screw up miserably and sometimes maliciously.

Bay Boy

(1,689 posts)
24. What in the world prompted you to have this...
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 10:55 PM
Mar 2013

...discussion with your 7 year old?

"By age 7 we'd trained our kid to fight like a demon if a child protective services person tried to take him anywhere"

I had four kids and never thought about that possibility.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
39. Having worked as a CPS caseworker for five years...
Mon Mar 11, 2013, 02:28 PM
Mar 2013

Having worked as a CPS caseworker in TX for five years, it's not so much about zealotry as it is about over-booked case loads. What you may perceive as zealotry, may simply be a case-worker who's burned out from seeing so many cases of abuse and neglect.

However, I'm sure you have objective, rather than merely anecdotal, evidence for calling caseworkers "malicious", "barely competent", "mean spirited and ill-advised", and the rest of your colorful adjectives, and will list for us this objective analysis of CPS workers.

PatrynXX

(5,668 posts)
14. clearly the cops haven't watched America's Funniest Home Videos
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 09:51 PM
Mar 2013

the other weekend. Where upon (blurred nowadays an obvious male toddler and a female toddler jumped out of the tub because the dog jumped right on in. ie so it must be worst than brother and sister and a dog in the same tub. So whats worse and incest,, bestiality innuendo? Guess nothing. and that one was seen by millions. zzzzzz ie the cops and walmart should be charged with child porn for having sick minds.

d_r

(6,907 posts)
3. you can still get pictures developed?
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 08:14 PM
Mar 2013

not kidding - or maybe they were printing them out or something.

proud2BlibKansan

(96,793 posts)
5. Well thank goodness for digital cameras and computers.
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 08:25 PM
Mar 2013

This crap shouldn't happen to innocent families anymore.

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
7. What happens
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 08:33 PM
Mar 2013

when the cops figure out how to look inside everyone's computers? If hackers can do it, what's stopping the cops?

proud2BlibKansan

(96,793 posts)
8. They can do that already.
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 08:37 PM
Mar 2013

Be careful what pictures you put up on the internet. I've had more than one friend see pictures taken at marches and other events disappear from online sharing sites.

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
11. Then you see the problem
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 08:48 PM
Mar 2013

If the cops go looking for trouble, they'll manage to find it. There will always be people harrassed for taking photos that Anne Geddes can make money off of.

PatrynXX

(5,668 posts)
16. be careful that your bluetooth isn't on
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 09:55 PM
Mar 2013

seen plenty of amateur porn that way because someone walked thru with some program (I'm no pro) that steals photos off your phone. viola oh the nude photos on peoples phones are unreal...

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,986 posts)
6. Are you kidding me?
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 08:29 PM
Mar 2013

Growing up it wasn't unusual for me and my siblings to be naked around each other prior to reaching the age of puberty.

This is totally strange. Must be some real up tight people in Arizona.

appleannie1

(5,067 posts)
9. Heck. On summer days my mom would put my brother and I in a washtub on the back porch.
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 08:38 PM
Mar 2013

I have pictures of my daughter and son splashing naked in a kiddie pool. We never viewed nakedness as obscene and because there were 7 kids getting baths every day they routinely shared the tub until a certain age. I guess I was a terrible parent according to people with dirty minds.

 

adieu

(1,009 posts)
10. The beef with Walmart is that
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 08:46 PM
Mar 2013

Walmart's got a huge treasure chest. The Peoria city's treasure chest is about 40¢ from empty.

lunasun

(21,646 posts)
12. what if they were nudist or practicing naturism?
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 08:48 PM
Mar 2013
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturism
Is it the printing of the children in the picture on to paper that is illegal?

Peoria is a burb of Phoenix i think
so not surprised by police action

PatrynXX

(5,668 posts)
17. as far as nudist children on a nudist site
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 09:58 PM
Mar 2013

totally legal what is illegal is removing the pictures off that site. and most places ban cameras. but someone always sneaks in.. I would assume Nudist colonies have their own developer though..

Jack Rabbit

(45,984 posts)
21. You know, I once thought of this scenario as a possible subject for satire
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 10:15 PM
Mar 2013

Christian fundies turn in a couple for taking photos of their small children in the bathtub, telling authorities it's child pornography.

I thought it was too ridiculous to actually happen.

Perhaps the Demarees' beef is actually with a overly vigilant store employee who notified the authorities and was subsequently fired. If this really is Walmart's corporate policy, I hope they get a lot of money from the bastards.

[font size="1" color="#FF0000"]ON EDIT[/font]

Better yet, I hope this is just an urban legend.


Lobo27

(753 posts)
25. CPS although good, tends to overreact at atime.
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 11:00 PM
Mar 2013

When I was 8 my mom gave me a slap on the butt for misbehaving in the front yard. Some neighbor saw and called CPS, they were accusing my parents of child endangerment and what not. I stayed w/ CPS for 5 days.

Smilo

(1,944 posts)
28. I think that the film processing labs wherever
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 01:45 AM
Mar 2013

they have to report.

I put the blame with the responding police officers and AZ protective services - sometimes I have to wonder at who these people are, what are their thinking processes and why they react they way they do.

pacalo

(24,721 posts)
29. June Cleaver could have gotten busted!
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 01:51 AM
Mar 2013
Episode: Baby Picture

Beaver's class holds a ""Most Beautiful Baby"" contest and each student is supposed to bring in a baby picture. To make the deadline, June picks out a cute picture of Beaver at the last minute and sends it to Miss Landers, not realizing that the cute picture may cause Beaver embarrassment.



http://follw.it/s/3272/Leave_It_to_Beaver/3

midnight

(26,624 posts)
38. Yes....
Mon Mar 11, 2013, 02:20 PM
Mar 2013

ma·lev·o·lent adjective \mə-ˈle-və-lənt\

Definition of MALEVOLENT

1
: having, showing, or arising from intense often vicious ill will, spite, or hatred
2
: productive of harm or evil
— ma·lev·o·lent·ly adverb
See malevolent defined for English-language learners »
See malevolent defined for kids »
Examples of MALEVOLENT

<the novel grossly oversimplified the conflict as a struggle between relentlessly malevolent villains on one side and faultless saints on the other>
There was no acknowledgment of the effects of cycle upon cycle of malevolent defeat, of the injury of seeing one generation rise above the cusp of poverty only to be indignantly crushed, of the impact of repeating tsunamis of violence … —Douglas A. Blackmon, Slavery By Another Name, 2008

 

YOHABLO

(7,358 posts)
35. 2009 folks .. why are we hearing about this now?
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 08:18 PM
Mar 2013

The parents should have known better .. especially in these times where people are so afraid they'll lose their job if they don't follow procedures. Perhaps the person working in the photo dept at Walmart was instructed to turn in anything that might seem pornographic. So they were just covering their back .. however who would have known. Just bad judgement on their behalf. Not surprising in a country so saturated with ignorant people .. who are unable to tie their own shoes without some permission from someone. It's all part of the corporate state we live in. Also, the ever-present vigilance of the religious right who seem to speculate everything as being ''immoral''. I'd sue Walmart .. oh hell yes, for a big chunk of money .. if they took away my kids because of some vacation photos? Oh please, what is wrong with these people? Is there any sanity left in this country?

Dr. Strange

(25,921 posts)
36. They originally sued in 2009.
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 08:53 PM
Mar 2013

Their suit against Wal-Mart failed, but the lawyer really wants to bring them back in, because, you know, $ka-ching$, so they're appealing and the appeal was just heard last week.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Ariz. Couple Sues Walmart...