Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Teamster Jeff

(1,598 posts)
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 02:32 PM Mar 2013

Local union protests possible Emergency Financial Manager for Detroit

Source: WXYZ-TV Channel 7 Detroit

Members of AFSCME Council 25 are spending their Sunday marching in protest against the possibility of an Emergency Financial Manager for Detroit.

The protest march began at noon at the DTE Energy building. While some members carried a casket, others held picket signs as the group of 50 people marched along Michigan Avenue near Third Street

Demonstrators are vowing to fight the law, which they believe violates democratic rights.




Read more: http://www.wxyz.com/dpp/news/region/detroit/local-union-protests-possible-emergency-financial-manager-for-detroit

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Local union protests possible Emergency Financial Manager for Detroit (Original Post) Teamster Jeff Mar 2013 OP
Way to go AFSCME Omaha Steve Mar 2013 #1
Never gets old. theaocp Mar 2013 #2
I wonder how the State of Michigan would feel if the federal government decided to implement an silvershadow Mar 2013 #3
A "50 people" protest march? Seems small, even for depopulated Detroit FarCenter Mar 2013 #4
Hmmmm...Democratic rights? Didn't the good people of Detroit VPStoltz Mar 2013 #5
He isn't the mayor. Union Scribe Mar 2013 #6
It may violate democratic rights, but there is no right to local government SpartanDem Mar 2013 #7
 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
3. I wonder how the State of Michigan would feel if the federal government decided to implement an
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 03:22 PM
Mar 2013

Emergency Manager law against it? Just sayin'.

VPStoltz

(1,295 posts)
5. Hmmmm...Democratic rights? Didn't the good people of Detroit
Mon Mar 11, 2013, 12:17 AM
Mar 2013

ELECT K.KILPATRICK? You keep exercising your rights and you keep making the wrong decisions - democratically speaking.

Union Scribe

(7,099 posts)
6. He isn't the mayor.
Mon Mar 11, 2013, 12:31 AM
Mar 2013

Not sure what your point is. Should elected leaders be rendered powerless because you don't like who they elected? The issue goes beyond Detroit.

SpartanDem

(4,533 posts)
7. It may violate democratic rights, but there is no right to local government
Mon Mar 11, 2013, 12:45 AM
Mar 2013
Unlike the relationship of federalism that exists between the U.S. government and the states (in which power is shared), municipal governments have no power except what is granted to them by their states. This legal doctrine was established by Judge John Forrest Dillon in 1872 and upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in Hunter v. Pittsburgh, 207 U.S. 161 (1907), which upheld the power of Pennsylvania to consolidate the city of Allegheny into the city of Pittsburgh, despite the wishes of the majority of Allegheny residents. In effect, state governments can place whatever restrictions they choose on their municipalities (including merging municipalities, controlling them directly, or abolishing them outright), as long as such rules don't violate the state's constitution.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Local_government_in_the_United_States#Dillon.27s_Rule


Not at least as Supreme Court precedent for the last 106 years is concerned. You could make an argument that the state applying it's power over it's municipalities doesn't allow them to do it in a discriminatory manner But of course the state would argue that criteria for a state takeover is neutral. I know a lawsuit is in the in the works, it'll be real interesting to read those briefings.
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Local union protests poss...