Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,542 posts)
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 04:29 PM Feb 2012

Mormon Church 'owns unregulated gun sale website'

Mormon Church 'owns unregulated gun sale website'

One of the most active and unregulated gun sale websites in America is owned by the Mormon Church, an investigation by New York's Mayor Michael Bloomberg has revealed.

By Rosa Prince, New York
6:36PM GMT 07 Feb 2012


KSL.com was criticised by the Mayor's office for running classified adverts which allow individuals to buy and sell handguns and other firearms without proper background checks and no questions asked.

The site is owned by Deseret Media, the for-profit arm of the Church of the Latter Day Saints – also known as the Mormons – which has come to prominence recently as a result of the presidential run of member Mitt Romney.

Mayor Michael Bloomberg is a lead campaigner for the regulation of firearms which cause carnage on the streets of New York and across the country, recording an advert aired during Sunday's Super Bowl calling for greater gun control.

A source who worked on his investigation into online gun sales said: "One would think that a church would feel a special obligation to make sure that they weren't fuelling a black market for a particularly deadly form of commerce."

More:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/9067367/Mormon-Church-owns-unregulated-gun-sale-website.html

66 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mormon Church 'owns unregulated gun sale website' (Original Post) Judi Lynn Feb 2012 OP
Bam. truthisfreedom Feb 2012 #1
Kpow. onehandle Feb 2012 #14
Pew! AnnieBW Feb 2012 #22
the mormon church is a business and should be taxed accordingly nt msongs Feb 2012 #2
...and the rate should be 75%. russspeakeasy Feb 2012 #4
That part of it is taxed ProgressiveProfessor Feb 2012 #17
It is called UBIT joeglow3 Feb 2012 #28
It's called CLASSIFIED ADS. TheWraith Feb 2012 #3
We've bought tons of stuff on ksl. Sold our van and a sofa there. Common Sense Party Feb 2012 #5
You can find firearms for sale in any other newspaper in the country? Hugabear Feb 2012 #7
It sure is a good thing Josh Powell didn't buy a gun, he might have killed his children. Oh, wait.. Skwid Feb 2012 #15
Private sale of guns is a state issue hack89 Feb 2012 #37
KSL is the website of an NBC-affiliated TV station, not a newspaper. KamaAina Feb 2012 #10
I wonder how many crimes have been committed with Mormon guns? baldguy Feb 2012 #6
I wonder how many guns went to Mexico? WHEN CRABS ROAR Feb 2012 #8
I bet.. virginia mountainman Feb 2012 #18
Going way back to when good ole joe smith Muskypundit Feb 2012 #34
I wonder why... kenfrequed Feb 2012 #9
"indulge"? In multiple Civil Rights? Oh, the Horroreurrs!1!!1! PavePusher Feb 2012 #44
uhm kenfrequed Feb 2012 #54
Well, in all seriousness, your post was pretty vague. PavePusher Feb 2012 #55
Rather obvious really... kenfrequed Feb 2012 #56
I didn't know that classified ads were an "industry". PavePusher Feb 2012 #57
I did. kenfrequed Feb 2012 #58
Maybe in our efforts to be snide, we're talking past each other. PavePusher Feb 2012 #59
Did I say it was illegal? kenfrequed Feb 2012 #60
Jesus Hussein Christ. nt DesertFlower Feb 2012 #11
What a bunch of crap Lurks Often Feb 2012 #12
Their broadcast media arm, Bonneville Broadcasting, owns a string of hate radio stations too. PSPS Feb 2012 #13
Figures. Hoyt Feb 2012 #24
Didn't know Bloomberg was connected to Bonneville. Thanks for passing that along. Judi Lynn Feb 2012 #25
Damn. Another batch of fence-sitting gungeon denizens just decided to vote for Willard Doctor_J Feb 2012 #16
Stop dividing! Stop dividing! ellisonz Feb 2012 #19
And you base that on what? ProgressiveProfessor Feb 2012 #41
The 2A debate, and absurd availability of guns, are not political? Doctor_J Feb 2012 #43
'"Arm Everyone" initiatives'? PavePusher Feb 2012 #46
No, classified ads for private party gun sales are not political ProgressiveProfessor Feb 2012 #51
Lame anti-religion smear. boppers Feb 2012 #20
lame response Skittles Feb 2012 #21
You have any idea how far the Catholic church has holdings? boppers Feb 2012 #27
lame Skittles Feb 2012 #30
Let's hope the publicity shuts down the unregulated gun sales. Also hope the publicity Hoyt Feb 2012 #23
Its private party sales, legal in many states ProgressiveProfessor Feb 2012 #40
Yes, because yellow journalism has a long, proud history of forming the basis for public policy slackmaster Feb 2012 #50
no big surprise.... madrchsod Feb 2012 #26
Mebbe they think magic underwear protects them from accidental discharge. Snarkoleptic Feb 2012 #29
But but but... they're allowed to!!!11!! Just like they're allowed to torture gay children Fearless Feb 2012 #31
We live in a very wacky country. No two ways about it. SleeplessinSoCal Feb 2012 #32
Every classified newspaper in the country, online or in print, is an "unregulated gun sale website" Atypical Liberal Feb 2012 #33
What you don't get is that maybe it ought not be that easy to sell guns privately. Hoyt Feb 2012 #35
A disconnect among the gun culture Doctor_J Feb 2012 #36
There are many laws that regulate thos sales. PavePusher Feb 2012 #47
It's already illegal. Atypical Liberal Feb 2012 #53
So you would support allowing NICS checks up for private sales? ProgressiveProfessor Feb 2012 #42
I support having to go through an FFL. Not a good idea to allow any fool to check up on anyone Hoyt Feb 2012 #61
No, if it benefits everyone, as you claim, everyone can pay for it. PavePusher Feb 2012 #64
Ziva can check up on me any time she wants Travelman Feb 2012 #65
As long as it remains anonymous, I'm fine with background checks for private sales. Atypical Liberal Feb 2012 #52
I hope this investigation is paid by Bloomberg personally JustABozoOnThisBus Feb 2012 #38
Some of us think he should have been charged personally with his bogus investigations in the ProgressiveProfessor Feb 2012 #39
What is a "proper" background check in a state where private sales of used guns don't require them? slackmaster Feb 2012 #45
Your subject line is telling Doctor_J Feb 2012 #48
Kindly point out where I have ever said there are too many regulations. slackmaster Feb 2012 #49
Simply require private sales to go through FFL. Right now, you can do it voluntarily. But most won't Hoyt Feb 2012 #62
The NYPDand ATF don't require background checks when they're making private sales. Remmah2 Feb 2012 #63
I'm sure the people who knowingly supply firearms to criminals and other prohibited people... slackmaster Feb 2012 #66

TheWraith

(24,331 posts)
3. It's called CLASSIFIED ADS.
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 04:33 PM
Feb 2012

Count on Bloomberg to propagandize for his own self-glorification. KSL.com is a local portal website for the Salt Lake City area which hosts, among other things, over 150,000 classified ads for everything under the sun, from kittens to RVs, and yes, firearms being sold legally by private owners to other private owners. The same as you find in any other newspaper in the country.

Common Sense Party

(14,139 posts)
5. We've bought tons of stuff on ksl. Sold our van and a sofa there.
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 04:52 PM
Feb 2012

I've looked at guns there, but haven't bought one.

Hugabear

(10,340 posts)
7. You can find firearms for sale in any other newspaper in the country?
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 06:05 PM
Feb 2012

Really?

What's to stop a mentally unbalanced person, violent felon, domestic abuser from buying a gun from a private owner? Oh that's right - ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
37. Private sale of guns is a state issue
Wed Feb 8, 2012, 09:27 AM
Feb 2012

the feds can only regulate interstate sale of guns. They have no jurisdiction over intrastate sales.

When people talk about the gunshow loophole, this is what they are really talking about.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
10. KSL is the website of an NBC-affiliated TV station, not a newspaper.
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 07:11 PM
Feb 2012

One wonders how NBC feels about this. Of course, their new owners are righties, too...

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
44. "indulge"? In multiple Civil Rights? Oh, the Horroreurrs!1!!1!
Wed Feb 8, 2012, 12:13 PM
Feb 2012

Industry? Are classified ads an "industry"? Hmmm....

kenfrequed

(7,865 posts)
54. uhm
Wed Feb 8, 2012, 02:05 PM
Feb 2012

I don't know what you are asking about or what manner of sarchasm you are engaging in. Maybe you should ask an actual question instead, or write more clearly.

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
55. Well, in all seriousness, your post was pretty vague.
Wed Feb 8, 2012, 02:53 PM
Feb 2012
Who do you think is "indulging" in what?

What "industry" are you refering to?

kenfrequed

(7,865 posts)
56. Rather obvious really...
Wed Feb 8, 2012, 03:25 PM
Feb 2012

Perhaps indulging in being involved in private enterprises. Most churches than involve themselves in such are sort of suspect in my mind. But I suppose the main thrust is obvious given what the article is about.

What other industry other than the sale of firearms do you imagine that I might be talking about? Do you really NOT know what this thread is about? Why should a church be involved in the for-profit sale of firearms like this? Or are you just trying to be cute and sarchastic.

At least have the integrity to say what you mean.
 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
57. I didn't know that classified ads were an "industry".
Wed Feb 8, 2012, 03:40 PM
Feb 2012

And I certainly didn't know that occasional private resale of personal property was an "industry".

Or perhaps you should have the integrity to say what you mean.

kenfrequed

(7,865 posts)
58. I did.
Wed Feb 8, 2012, 03:47 PM
Feb 2012

This is a large scale operation. Go ahead and deny it all you like.

And I have said what I mean, I wasn't the one that decided to play coy, cute, and sarchastic. Challenging me on that does not add one dram of weight to your posts.

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
59. Maybe in our efforts to be snide, we're talking past each other.
Wed Feb 8, 2012, 03:56 PM
Feb 2012

In my view, you seem to be implying that they (KSL/LDS Church) are running an illicit gun sale business. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

kenfrequed

(7,865 posts)
60. Did I say it was illegal?
Wed Feb 8, 2012, 04:32 PM
Feb 2012

And are you busy defending the Mormon church and their support of internal arms trade against all comers? So much so that you have decided to try to snark your way through discussion?

Precisely what is your point? Can you make it without engaging in sarchasm, logical fallacy, or straw-manning?

If you actually believe they are doing nothing wrong then simply say so. Directly and openly make a statement and cite your supports for it.

 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
12. What a bunch of crap
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 07:28 PM
Feb 2012

Private sales are regulated by STATE law, not Federal law. The site merely accepts advertisements for firearms and accessories.

Of course Bloomberg goes around with 5-6 armed, plain clothed detectives, paid for by tax payer dollars, wherever he goes, but he's special and we're not.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/11/30/politics/main3558935.shtml?source=related_story

Judi Lynn

(160,542 posts)
25. Didn't know Bloomberg was connected to Bonneville. Thanks for passing that along.
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 10:38 PM
Feb 2012

They don't have much to be proud about, with that acquisition.

How many young people have NEVER heard normal a.m. radio programming, anyway? Hatefest radio seems to have been here forever.

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
16. Damn. Another batch of fence-sitting gungeon denizens just decided to vote for Willard
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 08:51 PM
Feb 2012

I hope we can live without their votes

ellisonz

(27,711 posts)
19. Stop dividing! Stop dividing!
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 09:50 PM
Feb 2012

You're dividing us! You're dividing us! Al Gore lost Tennessee because of guns, if he had and Clinton hadn't passed some gun control he would have won Tennessee!

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)
41. And you base that on what?
Wed Feb 8, 2012, 12:03 PM
Feb 2012

Its just online ads for in state private transactions. Its legal and not the least political.

Your attempt to cast dispersions on RKBA Democratic Party member is noted for the smear that it is.

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
43. The 2A debate, and absurd availability of guns, are not political?
Wed Feb 8, 2012, 12:11 PM
Feb 2012

heh. thanks for clearing that up.

As for the the subject line to which you responded, during a recent post-massacre thread, I reported that by supporting Walker, LaPage, Corbett, Daniels, and so on for their "Arm Everyone" initiatives, the gunsters are also supporting union-busting, anti-teacher, anti-education, anti-worker, anti-choice, and anti-family agendas. One reply was, "I only vote on the gun issue".

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)
51. No, classified ads for private party gun sales are not political
Wed Feb 8, 2012, 12:55 PM
Feb 2012

As a practical matter, they are already in circulation, and if an FFL was required to make the transaction, it would change nothing. The better answer is open access to background checks.

I am yet to see anythings called "Arm Everyone" initiative by any organization or pol.

The real absurdity about firearms availability is the unconscionable restrictions some locales place upon legal ownership and possession.

To claim that if you agree with someone on one issue you buy their entire agenda is juvenile at best. There are many RKBA Democratic Party members who support none of those agendas, but are firmly pro 2A.

Keep up the smearing...

boppers

(16,588 posts)
27. You have any idea how far the Catholic church has holdings?
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 10:55 PM
Feb 2012

The Mormon church?

If you dig enough, both are tied to gambling, drinking, abortion, porn, the mob, child porn, whatever.

Making those connections is really just amateur conspiracy theory games.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
23. Let's hope the publicity shuts down the unregulated gun sales. Also hope the publicity
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 10:29 PM
Feb 2012

doesn't attract a bunch of people who shouldn't be allowed to own a firearm.

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
50. Yes, because yellow journalism has a long, proud history of forming the basis for public policy
Wed Feb 8, 2012, 12:49 PM
Feb 2012

Fearless

(18,421 posts)
31. But but but... they're allowed to!!!11!! Just like they're allowed to torture gay children
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 11:31 PM
Feb 2012

In private schools into thinking that something is wrong with them.

 

Atypical Liberal

(5,412 posts)
33. Every classified newspaper in the country, online or in print, is an "unregulated gun sale website"
Wed Feb 8, 2012, 12:36 AM
Feb 2012

The post headline is sensational.

The fact of the matter is, in most states you can open up your local Penny Saver and look in the sporting goods section and find dozens of guns for sale from private individuals. And in most states, there is no background check for firearm sales between private individuals.

The Federal government cannot control intra-state commerce, so they cannot regulate private firearms between individuals. Only if you sell a firearm to someone in another state must the firearm be shipped through an FFL dealer and a background check run.

Some states do require private sales to have background checks, but not many.

Most criminals are probably not interested in paying market rates for a firearm anyway, and that is what you will find going to a classified ad.

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
36. A disconnect among the gun culture
Wed Feb 8, 2012, 09:18 AM
Feb 2012

the NRA is complaining constantly that there are "too many laws", then we read that every local paper in the country contains ads for unregulated gun sales, so in this case the LDS selling guns is no problem.

 

Atypical Liberal

(5,412 posts)
53. It's already illegal.
Wed Feb 8, 2012, 02:02 PM
Feb 2012

It's already illegal to sell a firearm to someone you know to be disqualified to own them, and it's already illegal for someone who is disqualified to own them to attempt to buy them.

That said, I'm OK with background checks for private sales as long as it preserves anonymous firearm ownership.

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)
42. So you would support allowing NICS checks up for private sales?
Wed Feb 8, 2012, 12:05 PM
Feb 2012

Last edited Wed Feb 8, 2012, 12:57 PM - Edit history (1)

Or other approaches that indicate the purchaser is not a proscribed individual?

Right now private sales cannot use NICS

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
61. I support having to go through an FFL. Not a good idea to allow any fool to check up on anyone
Wed Feb 8, 2012, 04:47 PM
Feb 2012

they want -- by claiming it is a private sale background check -- to see if they have something in their background that would preclude a gun sale.

When my dad died, I sold some nice target pistols through an FFL. They handled paper work, shipping, etc., for $35 on my end. I'm sure the guy on the other end charged the buyer something too. That's the way to do it.

Yea, I know, it will cost a seller a few more dollars -- but if you really care about background checks, you'll be glad to do it.

Background checks need to be a lot tougher too.
 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
64. No, if it benefits everyone, as you claim, everyone can pay for it.
Wed Feb 8, 2012, 05:18 PM
Feb 2012

And what do you mean by "Background checks need to be a lot tougher too."? What is it they should look at that they do not do so now?

 

Atypical Liberal

(5,412 posts)
52. As long as it remains anonymous, I'm fine with background checks for private sales.
Wed Feb 8, 2012, 02:00 PM
Feb 2012

Open up NICS to the public. Or better yet, issue FOID cards with state-issued IDs to all qualified individuals except those who choose to opt out.

Then you can have background checks for private sales.

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,343 posts)
38. I hope this investigation is paid by Bloomberg personally
Wed Feb 8, 2012, 10:09 AM
Feb 2012

I'd hate to see NYC funds used to conduct interstate investigations into legal activities.

Unless NYC is running a huge surplus.

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
45. What is a "proper" background check in a state where private sales of used guns don't require them?
Wed Feb 8, 2012, 12:14 PM
Feb 2012

This story is lame.

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
48. Your subject line is telling
Wed Feb 8, 2012, 12:18 PM
Feb 2012

The NRA's refrain is that there are "too many regulations". Your SL says, "private sales of used guns don't require (background checks)". those two don't jibe

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
49. Kindly point out where I have ever said there are too many regulations.
Wed Feb 8, 2012, 12:38 PM
Feb 2012

It is a FACT that in the state of Utah private, intrastate transfers of used ordinary firearms (meaning ones that are not regulated under the National Firearms Act), do not require background checks.

It is also a FACT there the National Instant Check System (NICS) which is used for checking the backgrounds of people who buy guns from licensed gun dealers, CANNOT be used by unlicensed people.

There is no system in place to perform background checks on private transfers of used firearms in the state of Utah, therefore, the term "proper background check" in the cited article has no real meaning. It's plain old yellow journalism.

The most "telling" aspect of my previous subject line is that nobody can give a straight answer to it. That includes you.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
62. Simply require private sales to go through FFL. Right now, you can do it voluntarily. But most won't
Wed Feb 8, 2012, 04:50 PM
Feb 2012
 

Remmah2

(3,291 posts)
63. The NYPDand ATF don't require background checks when they're making private sales.
Wed Feb 8, 2012, 05:00 PM
Feb 2012

Go figure.
http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/NYPD-Gun-Ring-Brooklyn-Officers-Guilty-Plea-138788159.html

Private sales are legal, do the ATF and NYPD make legal sales?

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
66. I'm sure the people who knowingly supply firearms to criminals and other prohibited people...
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 12:27 PM
Feb 2012

...would be happy to comply. Of course there is that little problem that the federal government lacks the authority to regulate private, intrastate sales of used things.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Mormon Church 'owns unreg...