Mormon Church 'owns unregulated gun sale website'
Mormon Church 'owns unregulated gun sale website'
One of the most active and unregulated gun sale websites in America is owned by the Mormon Church, an investigation by New York's Mayor Michael Bloomberg has revealed.
By Rosa Prince, New York
6:36PM GMT 07 Feb 2012
KSL.com was criticised by the Mayor's office for running classified adverts which allow individuals to buy and sell handguns and other firearms without proper background checks and no questions asked.
The site is owned by Deseret Media, the for-profit arm of the Church of the Latter Day Saints also known as the Mormons which has come to prominence recently as a result of the presidential run of member Mitt Romney.
Mayor Michael Bloomberg is a lead campaigner for the regulation of firearms which cause carnage on the streets of New York and across the country, recording an advert aired during Sunday's Super Bowl calling for greater gun control.
A source who worked on his investigation into online gun sales said: "One would think that a church would feel a special obligation to make sure that they weren't fuelling a black market for a particularly deadly form of commerce."
More:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/9067367/Mormon-Church-owns-unregulated-gun-sale-website.html
truthisfreedom
(23,148 posts)Bam bam.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)Kpow kpow.
Pew! Pew!
msongs
(67,409 posts)russspeakeasy
(6,539 posts)ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)joeglow3
(6,228 posts)THEY are taxed on those profits.
TheWraith
(24,331 posts)Count on Bloomberg to propagandize for his own self-glorification. KSL.com is a local portal website for the Salt Lake City area which hosts, among other things, over 150,000 classified ads for everything under the sun, from kittens to RVs, and yes, firearms being sold legally by private owners to other private owners. The same as you find in any other newspaper in the country.
Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)I've looked at guns there, but haven't bought one.
Hugabear
(10,340 posts)Really?
What's to stop a mentally unbalanced person, violent felon, domestic abuser from buying a gun from a private owner? Oh that's right - ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.
Skwid
(86 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)the feds can only regulate interstate sale of guns. They have no jurisdiction over intrastate sales.
When people talk about the gunshow loophole, this is what they are really talking about.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)One wonders how NBC feels about this. Of course, their new owners are righties, too...
baldguy
(36,649 posts)How many people have been murdered?
WHEN CRABS ROAR
(3,813 posts)virginia mountainman
(5,046 posts)Not NEARLY as many as the ATF let walk....
Muskypundit
(717 posts)Massacred hundreds of non moron settlers?
Probably a lot.
kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)Why would they indulge in this? How long have they been involved in this industry?
PavePusher
(15,374 posts)Industry? Are classified ads an "industry"? Hmmm....
I don't know what you are asking about or what manner of sarchasm you are engaging in. Maybe you should ask an actual question instead, or write more clearly.
PavePusher
(15,374 posts)What "industry" are you refering to?
kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)Perhaps indulging in being involved in private enterprises. Most churches than involve themselves in such are sort of suspect in my mind. But I suppose the main thrust is obvious given what the article is about.
What other industry other than the sale of firearms do you imagine that I might be talking about? Do you really NOT know what this thread is about? Why should a church be involved in the for-profit sale of firearms like this? Or are you just trying to be cute and sarchastic.
At least have the integrity to say what you mean.
PavePusher
(15,374 posts)And I certainly didn't know that occasional private resale of personal property was an "industry".
Or perhaps you should have the integrity to say what you mean.
kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)This is a large scale operation. Go ahead and deny it all you like.
And I have said what I mean, I wasn't the one that decided to play coy, cute, and sarchastic. Challenging me on that does not add one dram of weight to your posts.
PavePusher
(15,374 posts)In my view, you seem to be implying that they (KSL/LDS Church) are running an illicit gun sale business. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)And are you busy defending the Mormon church and their support of internal arms trade against all comers? So much so that you have decided to try to snark your way through discussion?
Precisely what is your point? Can you make it without engaging in sarchasm, logical fallacy, or straw-manning?
If you actually believe they are doing nothing wrong then simply say so. Directly and openly make a statement and cite your supports for it.
DesertFlower
(11,649 posts)Lurks Often
(5,455 posts)Private sales are regulated by STATE law, not Federal law. The site merely accepts advertisements for firearms and accessories.
Of course Bloomberg goes around with 5-6 armed, plain clothed detectives, paid for by tax payer dollars, wherever he goes, but he's special and we're not.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/11/30/politics/main3558935.shtml?source=related_story
PSPS
(13,599 posts)Judi Lynn
(160,542 posts)They don't have much to be proud about, with that acquisition.
How many young people have NEVER heard normal a.m. radio programming, anyway? Hatefest radio seems to have been here forever.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)I hope we can live without their votes
ellisonz
(27,711 posts)You're dividing us! You're dividing us! Al Gore lost Tennessee because of guns, if he had and Clinton hadn't passed some gun control he would have won Tennessee!
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)Its just online ads for in state private transactions. Its legal and not the least political.
Your attempt to cast dispersions on RKBA Democratic Party member is noted for the smear that it is.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)heh. thanks for clearing that up.
As for the the subject line to which you responded, during a recent post-massacre thread, I reported that by supporting Walker, LaPage, Corbett, Daniels, and so on for their "Arm Everyone" initiatives, the gunsters are also supporting union-busting, anti-teacher, anti-education, anti-worker, anti-choice, and anti-family agendas. One reply was, "I only vote on the gun issue".
PavePusher
(15,374 posts)Cite, please?
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)As a practical matter, they are already in circulation, and if an FFL was required to make the transaction, it would change nothing. The better answer is open access to background checks.
I am yet to see anythings called "Arm Everyone" initiative by any organization or pol.
The real absurdity about firearms availability is the unconscionable restrictions some locales place upon legal ownership and possession.
To claim that if you agree with someone on one issue you buy their entire agenda is juvenile at best. There are many RKBA Democratic Party members who support none of those agendas, but are firmly pro 2A.
Keep up the smearing...
boppers
(16,588 posts)What's next, the faith of craigslist?
Skittles
(153,164 posts)boppers
(16,588 posts)The Mormon church?
If you dig enough, both are tied to gambling, drinking, abortion, porn, the mob, child porn, whatever.
Making those connections is really just amateur conspiracy theory games.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)doesn't attract a bunch of people who shouldn't be allowed to own a firearm.
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)Use of NCIS is precluded for them by law.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)madrchsod
(58,162 posts)they have always live by their laws.
Snarkoleptic
(5,997 posts)(firearms too)
Fearless
(18,421 posts)In private schools into thinking that something is wrong with them.
SleeplessinSoCal
(9,123 posts)Atypical Liberal
(5,412 posts)The post headline is sensational.
The fact of the matter is, in most states you can open up your local Penny Saver and look in the sporting goods section and find dozens of guns for sale from private individuals. And in most states, there is no background check for firearm sales between private individuals.
The Federal government cannot control intra-state commerce, so they cannot regulate private firearms between individuals. Only if you sell a firearm to someone in another state must the firearm be shipped through an FFL dealer and a background check run.
Some states do require private sales to have background checks, but not many.
Most criminals are probably not interested in paying market rates for a firearm anyway, and that is what you will find going to a classified ad.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)the NRA is complaining constantly that there are "too many laws", then we read that every local paper in the country contains ads for unregulated gun sales, so in this case the LDS selling guns is no problem.
PavePusher
(15,374 posts)You should look them up.
, indeed.
Atypical Liberal
(5,412 posts)It's already illegal to sell a firearm to someone you know to be disqualified to own them, and it's already illegal for someone who is disqualified to own them to attempt to buy them.
That said, I'm OK with background checks for private sales as long as it preserves anonymous firearm ownership.
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)Last edited Wed Feb 8, 2012, 12:57 PM - Edit history (1)
Or other approaches that indicate the purchaser is not a proscribed individual?
Right now private sales cannot use NICS
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)they want -- by claiming it is a private sale background check -- to see if they have something in their background that would preclude a gun sale.
When my dad died, I sold some nice target pistols through an FFL. They handled paper work, shipping, etc., for $35 on my end. I'm sure the guy on the other end charged the buyer something too. That's the way to do it.
Yea, I know, it will cost a seller a few more dollars -- but if you really care about background checks, you'll be glad to do it.
Background checks need to be a lot tougher too.
PavePusher
(15,374 posts)And what do you mean by "Background checks need to be a lot tougher too."? What is it they should look at that they do not do so now?
Atypical Liberal
(5,412 posts)Open up NICS to the public. Or better yet, issue FOID cards with state-issued IDs to all qualified individuals except those who choose to opt out.
Then you can have background checks for private sales.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,343 posts)I'd hate to see NYC funds used to conduct interstate investigations into legal activities.
Unless NYC is running a huge surplus.
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)mid Atlantic.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)This story is lame.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)The NRA's refrain is that there are "too many regulations". Your SL says, "private sales of used guns don't require (background checks)". those two don't jibe
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)It is a FACT that in the state of Utah private, intrastate transfers of used ordinary firearms (meaning ones that are not regulated under the National Firearms Act), do not require background checks.
It is also a FACT there the National Instant Check System (NICS) which is used for checking the backgrounds of people who buy guns from licensed gun dealers, CANNOT be used by unlicensed people.
There is no system in place to perform background checks on private transfers of used firearms in the state of Utah, therefore, the term "proper background check" in the cited article has no real meaning. It's plain old yellow journalism.
The most "telling" aspect of my previous subject line is that nobody can give a straight answer to it. That includes you.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Remmah2
(3,291 posts)Go figure.
http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/NYPD-Gun-Ring-Brooklyn-Officers-Guilty-Plea-138788159.html
Private sales are legal, do the ATF and NYPD make legal sales?
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)...would be happy to comply. Of course there is that little problem that the federal government lacks the authority to regulate private, intrastate sales of used things.