Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Sat May 11, 2013, 04:01 PM May 2013

Holder: Civilian courts best to try terror cases

Source: AP

WASHINGTON (AP) — Attorney General Eric Holder says those who argue that civilian courts are incapable are handling terrorism cases “are simply wrong.”

He says that after Sept. 11, members of Congress “placed unwise and unwarranted” restrictions on where certain suspected terrorists could be held, charged and prosecuted. In the wake of the Boston Marathon bombings, Holder says “many of these tired and meritless political arguments” about the effectiveness of civilian courts have come up again.

On Saturday, he told law school graduates of the University of California, Berkeley, that federal courts have shown a “robust ability to stop terrorists and collect intelligence,” and he contends that any move to limit their use would be counterproductive.

The Justice Department in Washington released a copy of his speech.

###

Read more: http://www.salon.com/2013/05/11/holder_civilian_courts_best_to_try_terror_cases/

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

byeya

(2,842 posts)
1. The police handled the first WTC bombing and should have been allowed to handle the 2nd. That
Sat May 11, 2013, 04:09 PM
May 2013

would not played into the RW "war president" hoax which allowed unbridled profiteering and widespread death, misery and destruction.

OKNancy

(41,832 posts)
2. Boo, Hiss, string him up...
Sat May 11, 2013, 04:11 PM
May 2013

oh wait. He said something that should meet with approval here at DU.
I'll wait for the good comments ( and wait, and wait....and wait)

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
5. Here's one. I'm not part of the gang wanting to rape him anally with sharp objects.
Sat May 11, 2013, 06:22 PM
May 2013
They make DU look so classy and right wing all at the same time, you know?

What the man said was logical and true. Maybe the rapists are busy elsewhere.




Enrique

(27,461 posts)
3. he's right, according to the law
Sat May 11, 2013, 04:16 PM
May 2013

hopefully the decisions will be made that way, and not based on politics.

 

Bannakaffalatta

(94 posts)
4. Of course he's right.
Sat May 11, 2013, 04:50 PM
May 2013

Civilian courts have access to law-enforcement agents, to forensic investigative facilities and experts in every field. In reality politically motivated crimes are no more mysterious or complicated than lust-, anger- or profit-motivated ones. (The 4 P's of Motive).

But if the regular police were allowed to deal with these crimes, then "terrorism" would cease to be a special bailiwick, requiring 16 unaccountable, amply-funded, secret para-military agencies to combat it.... or inflame it, extirpate or expand it, or whatever else they may be doing that's none of our business.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Holder: Civilian courts b...