Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,639 posts)
Tue Jun 4, 2013, 10:54 PM Jun 2013

Chrysler refuses US request to recall vehicles

Source: AP-Excite

By TOM KRISHER and DEE-ANN DURBIN

DETROIT (AP) - A defiant Chrysler is refusing to recall about 2.7 million Jeeps the government says are at risk of a fuel tank fire in a rear-end collision.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration sent Chrysler a letter asking that the company voluntarily recall Jeep Grand Cherokees from 1993 through 2004 and Jeep Libertys from 2002 through 2007.

Chrysler Group LLC, which is majority-owned by Italy's Fiat SpA, said in a statement Tuesday that the Jeeps are safe and it "does not intend to recall the vehicles."

Such a refusal by an auto company is rare. NHTSA can order a recall but needs a court order to enforce it.

FULL story at link.


Read more: http://apnews.excite.com/article/20130604/DA6N72B00.html





In this file photo taken Fed. 2, 2001, rows of 2001 Jeep Grand Cherokees are lined up outside the Jefferson North Assembly Plant in Detroit. Chrysler is refusing a request by U.S. safety regulators to recall about 2.7 million vehicles to fix fuel tanks that could leak and cause fires in rear-end collisions.The company says it's been asked by the government to recall Jeep Grand Cherokees from 1993 through 2004 and Jeep Libertys from 2002 through 2007. But Chrysler says in a statement that the SUVs are safe and not defective. (AP Photo/Carlos Osorio, File)

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Chrysler refuses US request to recall vehicles (Original Post) Omaha Steve Jun 2013 OP
Chrysler's response. bluedigger Jun 2013 #1
If all that is true, it's a pretty persuasive response. nt greyl Jun 2013 #5
I think they have a legitimate argument. bluedigger Jun 2013 #7
as my brother owns one PatrynXX Jun 2013 #2
Whose seat were they betting on? Mnemosyne Jun 2013 #3
Their lawyers think that it is more cost effective to pay off the lawsuits for the deaths rhett o rick Jun 2013 #4
And they state that where? DainBramaged Jun 2013 #6
I do know that's what Ford did with the Pinto. Archae Jun 2013 #8
That's what Ford did with that pickup whose gas tanks exploded. They had a study rhett o rick Jun 2013 #10
Had one of those Vegas from the '80's alittlelark Jun 2013 #9

bluedigger

(17,086 posts)
7. I think they have a legitimate argument.
Wed Jun 5, 2013, 01:29 AM
Jun 2013

I'm not an engineer, but I don't think my old GC was a death trap, by any means. Hardly a Pinto, for example. But, I suspect they will have to let the courts decide who's right.

PatrynXX

(5,668 posts)
2. as my brother owns one
Tue Jun 4, 2013, 11:31 PM
Jun 2013

Supposedly it's because Fiat didn't make those cars Saying they are safe is BS from them. They didn't make them so have no responsibility for them. where he goes wrong is saying the old Chrysler would never do this. uh 1996 they did and at first lost then won.... over seat bets.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
4. Their lawyers think that it is more cost effective to pay off the lawsuits for the deaths
Tue Jun 4, 2013, 11:55 PM
Jun 2013

than do a recall. They have no morals.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
10. That's what Ford did with that pickup whose gas tanks exploded. They had a study
Wed Jun 5, 2013, 09:27 AM
Jun 2013

to determine which was more cost effective, a recall or fighting victims in court. People died because of their decision, yet they got to keep their bonuses. Capitalism/fascism is painless, and it brings on many changes.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Chrysler refuses US reque...