Bradley Manning Lawyer Calls For 'Aiding the Enemy' Charges To Be Dropped...
Source: the guardian
Defence lawyers acting for Bradley Manning, the US soldier who fed a trove of state secrets to WikiLeaks, have called for several of the 22 counts against him to be dismissed, including the most serious charge that he "aided the enemy".
Manning's lead lawyer, the civilian attorney David Coombs, has filed four motions with the military court in Fort Meade, Maryland, asking the judge to drop several charges because of lack of evidence. In addition to aiding the enemy, the relevant counts include the allegation that Manning stole or purloined US property in the form of unauthorised intelligence drawn from Afghan and Iraq warlogs, Guantánamo detainee files and hundreds of thousands of US diplomatic cables from embassies around the world.
Coombs has also filed a motion to dismiss the allegation that Manning violated section 1030 of the federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act by "knowingly exceeding authorised access" on a secret military network and transmitting documents to WikiLeaks, "with reason to believe that such information so obtained could be used to the injury of the United States, or to the advantage of any foreign nation".
Section 1030 carries a maximum sentence of 10 years, while aiding the enemy a violation under military law carries a possible life sentence with no chance of parole. Manning has already pleaded guilty to less serious offences carrying a maximum sentence of 20 years, although he has denied that he aided the enemy...
Read more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jul/08/bradley-manning-lawyer-charges-dropped-trial
[font color="darkred" size="3"]Warning -- graphic violence[/font]
Snippet of Video leaked by Manning to WikiLeaks:
hlthe2b
(102,328 posts)intent...
I can't help but note how very small Manning is. RIght or wrong, there must be a lot of strength and determination in that small package.
struggle4progress
(118,320 posts)For the charge, the issue will be whether Manning deliberately engaged in conduct that he should reasonably have known was likely to lead to the enemy's possession of information
think
(11,641 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)it is pretty clear cut what he did - no room for reasonable doubt like Zimmerman. The only real question is the length of his sentence.
NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)Almost disturbing
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)micraphone
(334 posts)How would ya feel only being moved around by a big bunch of guys twice your size. And he's cuffed.
He's still being tortured. I guess he can say that this OTT reaction means he's won something.
annm4peace
(6,119 posts)should be talking about this trial every day.
this is about our democracy.
Zimmerman trial is also important but Manning's trial is also important
Laughing Mirror
(4,185 posts)What would you do?"
Good question, Bradley Manning.
Aiding the enemy? Who is the enemy?
"I want people to see the truth, because without information, you cannot make informed decisions as a public."
Oh, so the enemy is the people, the public ... you and me, all of us.