NSA Sued By Unusual Coalition Of Gun Rights And Environmental Activists Over 'Dragnet Surveillance'
Source: Huffington Post
Nearly two dozen political and religious groups from across the ideological spectrum, including the CalGuns Foundation and Greenpeace, sued the National Security Agency in federal district court on Tuesday. The civil lawsuit challenges the spy agency's authority to harvest and store phone records.
The suit was filed in San Francisco federal district court and was brought by the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a digital rights advocacy group and law firm. It asserts that the NSA's "dragnet surveillance" -- which extends to millions of Americans -- is illegal and unconstitutional.
Other organizations, including the American Civil Liberties Union, have also recently filed suit against the NSA in response to leaked information on its surveillance programs. This most recent case is notable in that it represents a broad coalition of groups that often don't have much use for each other.
Plaintiffs include GreenPeace, Human Rights Watch and the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws. CalGuns, which lobbies against more restrictive gun laws, and one California gun manufacturer, Franklin Armory, have also joined the case, as have religious groups including the Council on American-Islamic Relations.
Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/16/nsa-sued-dragnet-surveillance_n_3605104.html
Oh look, people from different ideological ends of the spectrum, coming together to fight what everyone can agree is wrong.
Now that's bipartisanship that doesn't require ironic quotes around it.
PB
Laelth
(32,017 posts)-Laelth
Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)wandy
(3,539 posts)Oh, you know, a few more religious groups, a union or two.
Maybe even be one of them red states that are always complaining about 'gubbernment' interference.
Might actually start a trend.
Might even accomplish something.
avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)Hydra
(14,459 posts)MotherPetrie
(3,145 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)During Bush they wanted to set up check points at state lines.
Some wanted those just to keep the "undesirables" out.
limpyhobbler
(8,244 posts)Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)Hunting usually involves both, so avid hunters sometimes care about both very deeply.
Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)!!
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)where were all these outraged types, when cameras were being installed ALL OVER cities in America?
XXX years ago in our area, waaaaaay up on top of poles at intersections overnight, cameras appeared.
Talk about your "Dragnet Surveillance"! Where was/is the howling about that stuff.
OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)of everyone's phone calls.
That's just fucking stupid, but when one is defending the indefensible, any argument sounds good, right?
I was outraged when Bush did it, I was outraged when Obama broke his promise to filibuster immunity, and I'm outraged now.
My liberal/progressive principles have remained consistent. How 'bout you?