Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bosonic

(3,746 posts)
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 02:06 AM Jul 2013

David Cameron cracks down on online pornography [UK]

Source: The Guardian

Every household in Britain connected to the internet will be obliged to declare whether they want to maintain access to online pornography, David Cameron will announce on Monday.

In the most dramatic step by the government to crack down on the "corroding" influence of pornography on childhood, the prime minister will say that all internet users will be contacted by their service providers and given an "unavoidable choice" on whether to use filters.

The changes will be introduced by the end of next year. As a first step, customers who set up new broadband accounts or switch providers would have to actively disable the filters by the end of this year.

The moves will be announced by the prime minister in a speech to the NSPCC in which he will unveil a series of measures to reduce access to pornography with a particular focus on illegal child pornography.

Read more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2013/jul/22/david-cameron-crackdown-internet-pornography

27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
David Cameron cracks down on online pornography [UK] (Original Post) Bosonic Jul 2013 OP
I thought the Puritans LEFT England. TM99 Jul 2013 #1
UNBELIEVABLE IN 2013. go west young man Jul 2013 #2
Did you even read the article? alp227 Jul 2013 #13
Internet users already have a choice. Diego_Native 2012 Jul 2013 #14
What does legal pornography have to do with illegal child pornography? DRoseDARs Jul 2013 #3
Especially since the Brits are obsessed with fisting.... Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2013 #4
According to several on the Guardian he cut funding for CEOP rpannier Jul 2013 #5
I am against this type of censorship, but the story is misleading DontTreadOnMe Jul 2013 #6
The person paying for Internet access as a choice... Orsino Jul 2013 #22
So there will be a list of porn watchers out there? How long til someone abuses access to that list? bloomington-lib Jul 2013 #7
Interesting take. truthisfreedom Jul 2013 #20
In time, of course there will be. hifiguy Jul 2013 #23
Cameron porn block plans in disarray as 100% of homes ‘opt-in’ dipsydoodle Jul 2013 #8
LOL Lenomsky Jul 2013 #11
orwell`s england.... madrchsod Jul 2013 #9
I view porn on occassions ... Lenomsky Jul 2013 #10
Next step...outlaw blow jobs? SoapBox Jul 2013 #12
Ken Cuccinelli is trying to ban that... Katashi_itto Jul 2013 #21
My initial reactiion was that many Bible thumpers in this country question everything Jul 2013 #15
Seems to me like the pot calling the kettle black... Fearless Jul 2013 #16
But Shouldn't the Government be a Wolf Frankula Jul 2013 #17
Porn providers will find a million ways around this daleo Jul 2013 #18
Next up: High Chancellor Sutler? n/t Akoto Jul 2013 #19
Ironic Bosonic Jul 2013 #24
A perfect summary of the Daily Fail tjwmason Jul 2013 #25
More FUD from the top. bemildred Jul 2013 #26
This is nonsense. First of all, Dash87 Jul 2013 #27
 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
1. I thought the Puritans LEFT England.
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 02:32 AM
Jul 2013

This is just another damned example of authoritarian control at the governmental level. I am sure there are more pressing economic or foreign policy matters that Cameron could be expending his political capital on instead of this kind of bullshit.

alp227

(32,026 posts)
13. Did you even read the article?
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 12:38 PM
Jul 2013
all internet users will be contacted by their service providers and given an "unavoidable choice" on whether to use filters.
14. Internet users already have a choice.
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 04:43 PM
Jul 2013

What Cameron is attempting to do is to shame people wholesale. It is the "Father State" attempting to exercise thought control over an entire country.

rpannier

(24,329 posts)
5. According to several on the Guardian he cut funding for CEOP
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 04:10 AM
Jul 2013

(Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre)
This is probably a way he sees to getting what he wants without paying for it
It also feeds into the stupid who believe there are simple solutions to all life's problems

 

DontTreadOnMe

(2,442 posts)
6. I am against this type of censorship, but the story is misleading
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 05:26 AM
Jul 2013

So the people are given a "choice"... they can have a filter installed.. or NOT.

Not exactly a crackdown on porn.

This is just putting the cost of the filter on the internet providers, instead on the home user.
I can see how some parents might want to turn on the filter, but never knew how to do it themselves.

It will be interesting to see what the majority of people choose.

Btw, in the USA... porn is watched equally by men and women. It goes back and forth 49/51 in percentages almost every year.

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
22. The person paying for Internet access as a choice...
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 01:03 PM
Jul 2013

...to register as either a good citizen or as a dirty, filthy porn-looker-atter.

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
23. In time, of course there will be.
Wed Jul 24, 2013, 04:13 AM
Jul 2013

And anyone who thinks those people won't face consequences is a bigger fool than I can imagine. Unless a majority of users decide they don't want the filter.

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
8. Cameron porn block plans in disarray as 100% of homes ‘opt-in’
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 08:15 AM
Jul 2013

Everyone has said they would like access to online pornography, scuppering David Cameron’s plans to make such content available only to people who say they want it.

The Prime Minister is expected to outline plans today for online pornography to be made available only in homes that ‘opt-in’ to such content, seemingly unaware that everyone has already done so.

Internet user Simon Williams told us, “The moment I hear there was a plan for opt-in, I put my hand in the air. Not that one, that one was busy.”

“If the government is somehow under the impression that this nation’s secret perverts will too ashamed to opt-in to get access to their porn fix, then they are sorely mistaken.”

http://newsthump.com/2013/07/22/cameron-porn-block-plans-in-disarray-as-100-of-homes-opt-in/

Lenomsky

(340 posts)
11. LOL
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 10:21 AM
Jul 2013

A spokesperson explained, “The mistake we have made is underestimating how thoroughly depraved the general public is, and how tedious masturbation can actually be without access to a myriad of online filth.”

Lenomsky

(340 posts)
10. I view porn on occassions ...
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 10:18 AM
Jul 2013

but think I'd opt out on the basis kids do get access unwittingly or for teenagers by design.

My sister recently told me her 10 y/o was getting explicit redirects and pop-ups so I'll reformat and reinstall his laptop OS soon.

I don't feel this is censorship but freedom to choose and hope the ISP design a decent filter and not fuck it up.

question everything

(47,485 posts)
15. My initial reactiion was that many Bible thumpers in this country
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 08:11 PM
Jul 2013

wish they could do the same.

On second thought: they wish they could force others to do the same, while they are free to do as they please, again.

Fearless

(18,421 posts)
16. Seems to me like the pot calling the kettle black...
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 08:25 PM
Jul 2013

What's he hiding?

Those who shout the loudest tend to be those with the most to run from.

Wolf Frankula

(3,601 posts)
17. But Shouldn't the Government be a
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 08:44 PM
Jul 2013
STERN FATHER to the people? Coming soon, political filters. Do the Tories (Gaelic for Robber) claim to be the party of small government and getting government of the people's backs?

More right wing hypocrisy.

Wolf

daleo

(21,317 posts)
18. Porn providers will find a million ways around this
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 09:07 PM
Jul 2013

It's both pointless and Puritan. It's just to appeal to the conservative base, many of whom are undoubtedly aficionados of the genre. So even there, he might well lose votes. It seems like the sort of thing desperate politicians do - his popularity must be "going down".

tjwmason

(14,819 posts)
25. A perfect summary of the Daily Fail
Wed Jul 24, 2013, 08:04 AM
Jul 2013

Prudish ranting on half of the screen.

Titillation on the other half.

Dash87

(3,220 posts)
27. This is nonsense. First of all,
Wed Jul 24, 2013, 09:26 AM
Jul 2013

what pedophiles network is going to purposely allow themselves to be found so easily through key words like "child sex?" That would be like a crack house posting a billboard outside saying "free crack!"

Secondly, Google is already on this. Google is secretly building a database of illegal stuff and is going to censor those results (as they should anyways, obviously).

Finally, I'm not sure that violent porn should be outlawed. Yeah it's weird and creepy, but it's not like anyone actually got hurt in them if they're simulated.

This seems like more of a RW censor attempt than doing anything productive.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»David Cameron cracks down...