Majority of Americans favor restricting abortion at 20 weeks, according to new Post-ABC poll
Source: Washington Post
By a margin of 56 to 27 percent, more Americans say theyd prefer to impose limits on abortions after the first 20 weeks of pregnancy rather than the 24-week mark established under current law, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll.
Another 10 percent surveyed in the poll volunteered they would prefer to outlaw abortion in the United States altogether or limit it earlier than 20 weeks after fertilization. At the same time, however, 54 percent say they oppose state laws that make it more difficult for abortion clinics to operate; compared to 45 percent who support such legislation. (See graphic below for a breakdown of results, and here for interactive polling data).
The findings come as lawmakers on Capitol Hill and in states across the country are pushing to ban abortions earlier and impose new requirements that make it harder for abortion clinics to operate. Under the Supreme Courts 1973 Roe v. Wade decision abortions can be performed until the point when an individual doctor determines a fetuss viability, which is generally defined as up to 24 weeks of gestation. After that point, the government can prohibit the procedure so long as it provides safeguards for the mothers health and well-being.
The poll suggests that significant support exists for banning abortions earlier in a womans pregnancy, but far less for instituting onerous restrictions for abortion providers.
Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/07/25/majority-of-americans-favor-restricting-abortion-at-20-weeks-according-to-new-post-abc-poll/
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Thankfully, cooler heads prevailed.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)totodeinhere
(13,058 posts)translate their opinion into action at the voting booth then we could see more and more pro life politicians elected. And we know what kind of mischief those politicians can be responsible for. So the results of this poll are troubling.
warrant46
(2,205 posts)awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)I would hate to see where we would be if the VRA and Civil Rights Acts were voted on by the general public.
Freddie
(9,268 posts)Exceptions for rape, incest, health concerns of the mother and fetal anomalies were allowed at the *sole discretion* of the woman's physician. I believe this is the approach in most European countries.
handmade34
(22,756 posts)should be ok with 20 weeks... this is a woman's issue and should be decided by individual women
Javaman
(62,531 posts)Abortion is a woman's health issue, not a political football whose root purpose is to subjugate half the population in this country.
The only people that need to be involved are the women and their doctors. It is nobody else's business, let alone some bought off politician.
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)Get your snouts out of a woman's crotch.
Squinch
(50,956 posts)Scairp
(2,749 posts)If a woman needs an abortion, or in fact wants one later than 20 weeks, then that is the way it should be. No limits, full stop.
valerief
(53,235 posts)shawn703
(2,702 posts)Are the women who need to make the decision for themselves.
eggplant
(3,911 posts)...abortion would be allowed up to when the fetus graduates from college.
MNBrewer
(8,462 posts)but yes. It should be a choice that it ultimately up to the pregnant woman, not a legislature, or the mob chanting slogans outside of the clinic.
I don't know when a fertilized egg becomes a person, and I don't believe anyone else knows either. So, it should be up to the individual conscience of the person who is pregnant.
warrant46
(2,205 posts)And in some cases the Mob burning down the clinic
totodeinhere
(13,058 posts)demagogue this issue.
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)we are allowing extremist fanatics to define the debate.
1ProudAtheist
(346 posts)65% of all Americans opposed the radical new healthcare program for seniors called "MEDICARE". So, your point is..............?
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)Really, have we become of nation of polls of less than 1,000 people determining our daily outcome?
I hope not. 2012 polling was totally off the mark.
d_r
(6,907 posts)I think this reflects the success of the anti choice people in spreading misinformation - from the fetal pain nonsense to the balderdash but ubiquitous 18 day heartbeat billboards. we need some process to get sound information out. and we need to stop letting them frame the argument, for example everytime someone calls an embryo or fetus a "baby" we need to call them on it. turn it around "how can we trust any info from you if you do not even understand basic correct terms?"
Crow73
(257 posts)So you poll a group of buffoons about something they have no idea about?
You want to counter the Right? Makes some catchy 24 week cloth-hanger memes.
Social Media is crushing them with same-sex equality.
See what I mean?
d_r
(6,907 posts)they are getting out way too much propaganda on this one and it is countered
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)davidpdx
(22,000 posts)What is the distance between the two airports in Moscow?
Crow73
(257 posts)Most people in the US believe that if you work hard you will be rewarded, not continually exploited.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)I think roe vs wade is good law and should remain in place.
"Under the Supreme Courts 1973 Roe v. Wade decision abortions can be performed until the point when an individual doctor determines a fetuss viability, which is generally defined as up to 24 weeks of gestation. After that point, the government can prohibit the procedure so long as it provides safeguards for the mothers health and well-being."
I don't like the idea at all that any medical records between Doctor and patient are ever shared with the state. Except for contagious disease threats to the general population.
handmade34
(22,756 posts)this country is heading... I feel nauseous...
and fuck the talk about rape, incest, mother's safety... if the argument is "life" then a life is a life no matter (but that is not my argument)
this is a woman's issue, an individual decision and no man need tell me or my daughters how to live our private lives...
... years ago, I aborted using herbs... are we headed to a place where I could have been imprisoned for that??
talk of limiting abortion makes me more than livid... I consider this very serious stuff
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)Most people (or law makers for that matter) don't even know what is meant by "20 weeks." Are we talking 20 weeks from last menstruation or are we talking 20 weeks from conception? I don't think it is actually possible to poll accurately on this question, because even doctors can't always determine when conception occurred.
PSPS
(13,603 posts)primavera
(5,191 posts)I mean, if you're an evangelical who believes that life begins and acquires its own, unique, god-given soul the moment that conception occurs, then there's no point after conception that abortion won't be snuffing out what you perceive to be a human being. If, on the other hand, you're a rationalist, a 24 week old fetus is just as undeveloped and non viable ex vivo as a 20 week old fetus is. After a point, I suppose late term abortions create potential risks to the woman's health, but no one seems to be particularly concerned about that. So why is 20 weeks a magic number? Why not 19 weeks or 21 weeks or 30 weeks?
MNBrewer
(8,462 posts)without risking a citation for indecent exposure.
bowens43
(16,064 posts)RC
(25,592 posts)Or is it 22? Please don't say 23.
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)21 weeks or less = ain't surviving.
22 weeks = 10% chance of surviving.
The real questions are going to be what happens when you have 100% survival rate for a zygote with transplanting. And then the fundies will have their true moral compass tested (will they offer surrogates to every single zygote that exists?).
BootinUp
(47,165 posts)dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)and as such the public don't get any say in that issue anyway.
bowens43
(16,064 posts)ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)on point
(2,506 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Genetic disorders can sometimes leave a baby with out a brain or a prognosis so poor that death is painful and imminent. Women need to mak their own informed decision, no let govt tell hem what they have to do.
Women should no be forced to have a baby they do not want to have.
It seems like a lot I men love discussing our vaginas and what we should do with them.
They're like pimps.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)blackspade
(10,056 posts)The fact of the matter is that women have the Constitutional right to an abortion before viability. Period.
The Stranger
(11,297 posts)Not here on DU, of course, but apparently so many others out there, as evidenced by this poll.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)When you think about how to take the country back from the fascists, think about 1500 hate radio outlets and every last psychopath that works there.
ut oh
(895 posts)only Republicans for this poll...
happyslug
(14,779 posts)i.e. when a man impregnates a woman, she is entering her third week of pregnancy. Yes, pregnancy is measured NOT from the point the woman became pregnant but her last period, about two weeks before. I ran across this factoid when I attend a seminar on medical terms for lawyers. Thus in most people's mind 20 weeks is 20 weeks (or almost five months) since she became pregnant NOT just 18 weeks. When a woman is in her 24th week of pregnancy, she has been "with child" for only 22 weeks.
Thus what most people think as of 20 weeks of pregnancy a doctor would say 22 weeks. 24 weeks of pregnancy is just 22 weeks of being "With child". Most people do NOT think pregnancy starts two weeks BEFORE the woman gets pregnant, but that how the medical community and the Legal community uses those terms.
roamer65
(36,745 posts)Don't matter what anyone thinks on it. It's law.
Federosky
(37 posts)For the record.
BootinUp
(47,165 posts)What do the dodos answering the poll that ways know that I don't.
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)I wonder why support is slowly dwindling.
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)Check out this take on it: http://rhrealitycheck.org/article/2012/10/09/briefs-in-support-arizonas-pre-viability-ban-show-evolution-legal-challenge-to-ro/
Roe v. Wade, whether people like it or not, was based on viability. Eventually this concept is going to be tested, the Fundies are just firing shots even though 20 weeks and 21 weeks are non-viable. 22 weeks are extremely rare.
The Straight Story
(48,121 posts)it is becoming a quaint notion as people duke it out over whose values are the best ones that others should live by and both sides tends to favor controlling/punishing choices (although they vary reasons the core principle is the same).
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)so I should probably be skeptical of what I think.
CindySessoms
(20 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Regardless of what your mom says we usually talk about these things.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)KT2000
(20,584 posts)are able to identify serious birth defects and many of those tests cannot be conducted before then. These would be defects that include having no brain. The 20 week laws would require women to give birth to babies that would die soon after birth.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)davidpdx
(22,000 posts)The 20 week limit is BS. I'm afraid my mom would be one of those people who would have answered yes had she been polled. Even though she is a D she is against women's rights. Go figure! As long as we keep a D legislature and governor in Oregon we'll be fine though. The only other way would be if the corporate Supreme Court overturns it.
Wolf Frankula
(3,601 posts)restrictions on the behavior of other people. They don't think they will be affected.
Wolf