Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bosonic

(3,746 posts)
Tue Sep 3, 2013, 01:52 PM Sep 2013

UN chief: Strike on Syria may unleash more turmoil

Source: AP

UNITED NATIONS (AP) — U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon is warning that any "punitive" action taken against Syria for an alleged chemical weapons attack last week could unleash more turmoil and bloodshed in that nation's civil war.

Ban also cautioned nations such as the United States and France that may be considering such strikes that they are legal only in self-defense under the U.N. Charter or if approved by the U.N. Security Council.

Russia and China have used their veto power in the council multiple times to keep it from taking action against Syrian President Bashar Assad's regime.

President Barack Obama received key support from leaders in Congress on Tuesday for a potential strike.

Read more: http://bigstory.ap.org/article/un-chief-strike-syria-may-unleash-more-turmoil

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
UN chief: Strike on Syria may unleash more turmoil (Original Post) Bosonic Sep 2013 OP
Shennanigans. This is Ron Paul disguised as a South Korean UN chief David Krout Sep 2013 #1
Eh? RobertEarl Sep 2013 #4
What the Secretary General of the United Nations did . . . another_liberal Sep 2013 #5
It was humorous. David__77 Sep 2013 #6
You get it nt David Krout Sep 2013 #7
"US withdraws from UN: Move denounced as 'communist' by GOP, making Dems leap to defense" MisterP Sep 2013 #2
Let's not do it. tblue Sep 2013 #3
 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
4. Eh?
Tue Sep 3, 2013, 02:23 PM
Sep 2013

Is the UN is based on spreading more chaos?.... NO

It is based upon keeping the damned stupid money loving from killing innocents.

Truly, either one is with the UN in keeping peace or one is against us.

Question of the day: Which side is one on?

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
5. What the Secretary General of the United Nations did . . .
Tue Sep 3, 2013, 02:31 PM
Sep 2013

I'm not sure what you're trying to say, but what the Secretary General of the United Nations did in making that statement took real, personal courage. We all need to think about his message and reflect on what the ultimate costs of starting another war of choice may be for our country and for the whole World.

David__77

(23,520 posts)
6. It was humorous.
Tue Sep 3, 2013, 02:49 PM
Sep 2013

I don't think the poster meant to convey a serious message, but instead mock those who may reflexively deride anti-war sentiment.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»UN chief: Strike on Syria...