Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
Thu Sep 5, 2013, 10:40 PM Sep 2013

US: Chemical attacks make Syria top security risk

Source: AP

WASHINGTON (AP) — For the first time in more than two years of a bloody civil war, President Barack Obama has declared Syria a national security threat that must be answered with a military strike — and in doing so he is warning Americans as much about the leaders of Iran and North Korea as about Bashar Assad.

America's credibility with those countries will be an immediate casualty if it stands down now on Syria, administration officials say in making their case for U.S. missile strikes.

Following an Aug. 21 chemical weapons attack outside Damascus, the White House declared Syria's 2-year civil war a top risk to American interests. If the U.S. fails to respond, officials said this week, it could encourage other hostile governments to use or develop weapons of mass destruction without fear of being punished.

It's a connection that's not immediately clear to many Americans — especially after the White House refused to send military support earlier in the Syrian war. The recent chemical weapons attack killed 1,429 people, U.S. intelligence officials say. Other estimates are somewhat lower. The wider war has killed more than 100,000.

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/us-chemical-attacks-syria-top-security-risk-190444746--politics.html

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
US: Chemical attacks make Syria top security risk (Original Post) onehandle Sep 2013 OP
If we are against chemical attacks and think they doc03 Sep 2013 #1
why? because no one wants the facilities to do so anywhere near them madrchsod Sep 2013 #5
Convenient CityDem Sep 2013 #7
Sounds so familiar. tofuandbeer Sep 2013 #2
This is why taking it before congress is just for show. Puzzledtraveller Sep 2013 #3
This article is essentially an argument for going to war to save face. Comrade Grumpy Sep 2013 #4
However, the rebels that we are helping christx30 Sep 2013 #6

doc03

(35,348 posts)
1. If we are against chemical attacks and think they
Fri Sep 6, 2013, 12:21 AM
Sep 2013

are so bad why don't we destroy the vast stockpiles we have as an example? Why do we even have them?

madrchsod

(58,162 posts)
5. why? because no one wants the facilities to do so anywhere near them
Fri Sep 6, 2013, 01:22 AM
Sep 2013

i found this from 2003. 10`s billions of dollars for facilities that have to be more secure than a nuke plant. russia has the same problems.

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/0928-10.htm

CityDem

(1,103 posts)
7. Convenient
Fri Sep 6, 2013, 01:35 AM
Sep 2013

It took 2 years to make this declaration? Nothing more than a convenient reason to start launching cruise missiles. We are living in such bizarre times. I never expected this kind of action from Obama or the Dems on Capitol Hill.

Puzzledtraveller

(5,937 posts)
3. This is why taking it before congress is just for show.
Fri Sep 6, 2013, 12:44 AM
Sep 2013

They are going to assert national security risk for the presidents power to order the strike.

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
4. This article is essentially an argument for going to war to save face.
Fri Sep 6, 2013, 01:12 AM
Sep 2013

It's a real, convoluted stretch to call Syria a threat to our national security.

christx30

(6,241 posts)
6. However, the rebels that we are helping
Fri Sep 6, 2013, 01:32 AM
Sep 2013

are, largely, comprised of Al Queda. And if *they* get their hands on the chemical weapons, that could be a security threat. I think it'd be better for the US if Assad kept the weapons in his hands, rather than it being anyone's ball game.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»US: Chemical attacks make...