US: Chemical attacks make Syria top security risk
Source: AP
WASHINGTON (AP) For the first time in more than two years of a bloody civil war, President Barack Obama has declared Syria a national security threat that must be answered with a military strike and in doing so he is warning Americans as much about the leaders of Iran and North Korea as about Bashar Assad.
America's credibility with those countries will be an immediate casualty if it stands down now on Syria, administration officials say in making their case for U.S. missile strikes.
Following an Aug. 21 chemical weapons attack outside Damascus, the White House declared Syria's 2-year civil war a top risk to American interests. If the U.S. fails to respond, officials said this week, it could encourage other hostile governments to use or develop weapons of mass destruction without fear of being punished.
It's a connection that's not immediately clear to many Americans especially after the White House refused to send military support earlier in the Syrian war. The recent chemical weapons attack killed 1,429 people, U.S. intelligence officials say. Other estimates are somewhat lower. The wider war has killed more than 100,000.
Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/us-chemical-attacks-syria-top-security-risk-190444746--politics.html
doc03
(35,348 posts)are so bad why don't we destroy the vast stockpiles we have as an example? Why do we even have them?
madrchsod
(58,162 posts)i found this from 2003. 10`s billions of dollars for facilities that have to be more secure than a nuke plant. russia has the same problems.
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/0928-10.htm
It took 2 years to make this declaration? Nothing more than a convenient reason to start launching cruise missiles. We are living in such bizarre times. I never expected this kind of action from Obama or the Dems on Capitol Hill.
tofuandbeer
(1,314 posts)Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)They are going to assert national security risk for the presidents power to order the strike.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)It's a real, convoluted stretch to call Syria a threat to our national security.
christx30
(6,241 posts)are, largely, comprised of Al Queda. And if *they* get their hands on the chemical weapons, that could be a security threat. I think it'd be better for the US if Assad kept the weapons in his hands, rather than it being anyone's ball game.