Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,045 posts)
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 12:21 AM Feb 2012

Supreme Court conflicted about prosecuting those who lie about military valor

The Supreme Court jousted for an hour Wednesday about whether the First Amendment allows the government to prosecute people for lying about earning military honors, and, if so, what else might be fair game.

(...)

At the end of the arguments in U.S. v. Alvarez , it was unclear how many of what Solicitor General Donald V. Verrilli Jr. called the court’s “slippery slope” questions were in the form of genuine concern or simply playing devil’s advocate.

The questions raise difficult issues, Verrilli conceded, but should not keep the court from upholding the Stolen Valor Act, which makes lying about receiving some of the nation’s highest military awards and decorations a crime, punishable in some cases by incarceration.

The statute is “about as narrow as you can get,” Verrilli said, and targets with “pinpoint accuracy” only “calculated factual falsehoods.” And the government since the days of George Washington has shown an interest in promoting valor and bravery in its military and keeping “charlatans” from usurping that glory.

full: http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/supreme-court-conflicted-about-prosecuting-those-who-lie-about-military-valor/2012/02/22/gIQAAHQLUR_singlePage.html

25 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court conflicted about prosecuting those who lie about military valor (Original Post) alp227 Feb 2012 OP
I wonder what this could lead to if they uphold the law. limpyhobbler Feb 2012 #1
They must be protecting the "chicken hawk wing". Historic NY Feb 2012 #2
Bingo! Tom Ripley Feb 2012 #11
Why not? Archae Feb 2012 #3
Only lies with the intention to defraud (claiming benefits, etc.) should be illegal. NYC Liberal Feb 2012 #4
yes, that's been my opinion on that too! alp227 Feb 2012 #5
I don't think the media is protected from liability for defamation. NYC Liberal Feb 2012 #6
Well, heck, I think I'm going to start claiming Javaman Feb 2012 #7
That's interesting... christx30 Feb 2012 #13
yeah, forgot about the arrow in the knee. Javaman Feb 2012 #14
You were there too? Old Troop Feb 2012 #19
Pft, you think that's something? Posteritatis Feb 2012 #22
As a veteran, I think it's deplorable for anyone to lie about receiving military honors... NaturalHigh Feb 2012 #8
I got the impression that the Legion is really pushing this Cosmocat Feb 2012 #9
I'm in total agreement... Gringostan Feb 2012 #10
25 years in uniform - and I agree that it should not be criminal absent fraud that can be addressed 24601 Feb 2012 #15
Other vets are typically pretty good at calling this stuff out, aren't they? Posteritatis Feb 2012 #23
The problem is they deserve a punch in the nose ..... BOHICA12 Feb 2012 #24
Would this then apply to Newt Gingrich? ieoeja Feb 2012 #12
Never heard the veteran connection - especially with prominent non-veteran Presidents wearing 24601 Feb 2012 #16
Sources: lots of (probably deceased now) members of American Legion Post #120, Loogootee, IN. ieoeja Feb 2012 #17
Something a bit more confirmable is required. PavePusher Feb 2012 #18
Loogootee, IN had a Cinderella HS BB team in what, 1975? No disrespect to your dad & my fellow 24601 Feb 2012 #21
Do you have a link? onenote Feb 2012 #25
Let them lie as long as they aren't hurting anyone by fraud or otherwise. Old Troop Feb 2012 #20

limpyhobbler

(8,244 posts)
1. I wonder what this could lead to if they uphold the law.
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 12:51 AM
Feb 2012

Could a state pass a law making it illegal to lie on a job application?

Could be a slippery slope.

NYC Liberal

(20,136 posts)
4. Only lies with the intention to defraud (claiming benefits, etc.) should be illegal.
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 02:02 AM
Feb 2012

Fraud definitely has never been protected speech.

Otherwise, it's unconstitutional as hell.

alp227

(32,045 posts)
5. yes, that's been my opinion on that too!
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 03:54 AM
Feb 2012

but regarding general lies in the media see the WTVT Monsanto controversy...in 2003 a fed appeals court ruled that the media has the right to lie, meaning that smear campaigns like Swift Boat can't be criminalized. But indeed fraud is crime not free speech.

NYC Liberal

(20,136 posts)
6. I don't think the media is protected from liability for defamation.
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 05:01 AM
Feb 2012

However, they get around that simply by saying "X said this" or "Y claims that." Which is almost always factually true if they can find one person who made the claim. It's why all those trashy tabloids are still in business: they are careful to add "according to a source" or similar to all their articles.

Javaman

(62,532 posts)
7. Well, heck, I think I'm going to start claiming
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 10:09 AM
Feb 2012

I was the hero at Balaclava during the Crimean war.

christx30

(6,241 posts)
13. That's interesting...
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 03:40 PM
Feb 2012

I served 3 tours in the Hundred Years war. I would have served a 4th, but I took an arrow to the knee.

Javaman

(62,532 posts)
14. yeah, forgot about the arrow in the knee.
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 07:44 PM
Feb 2012

I would have been the hero at Sebastopol but I too, got an arrows to the knee.

Posteritatis

(18,807 posts)
22. Pft, you think that's something?
Sat Feb 25, 2012, 12:09 AM
Feb 2012

I was the hero at Balaclava during the Civil War.

What, you haven't heard about that one?

Totally classified, you see. Already said too much.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
8. As a veteran, I think it's deplorable for anyone to lie about receiving military honors...
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 10:25 AM
Feb 2012

but I don't think we need to waste time arresting them and putting them through the court system. They will most likely be found out and humiliated anyway.

Cosmocat

(14,567 posts)
9. I got the impression that the Legion is really pushing this
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 10:45 AM
Feb 2012

from watching a bit on Faux or CNN - yes, I know it was Faux or CNN ...

I tend to think this is an overreach, but if the Legion and other veteran groups are pushing it, it is hard to go against them.

Gringostan

(127 posts)
10. I'm in total agreement...
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 12:26 PM
Feb 2012

I'm in total agreement; with the internet today it's pretty much impossible to lie about anything without getting caught. And, in the case of stolen valor, publicly disgraced.

24601

(3,962 posts)
15. 25 years in uniform - and I agree that it should not be criminal absent fraud that can be addressed
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 08:58 PM
Feb 2012

separately.

Posteritatis

(18,807 posts)
23. Other vets are typically pretty good at calling this stuff out, aren't they?
Sat Feb 25, 2012, 12:11 AM
Feb 2012

I know there's groups that make a point of discrediting the herds of people claiming to be, e.g., Navy Seals.

On this side of the border, Victoria Cross claimants are probably the funniest as far as the "who do you think you're fooling?" people go.

 

BOHICA12

(471 posts)
24. The problem is they deserve a punch in the nose .....
Sat Feb 25, 2012, 12:12 AM
Feb 2012

and the subsequent humiliation. That type of justice is sort of - like - criminal. Sad!

 

ieoeja

(9,748 posts)
12. Would this then apply to Newt Gingrich?
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 12:56 PM
Feb 2012

Flag lapel pins indicated that the wearer was a veteran. When Newt got to DC he did not like the fact that a far higher percentage of elected Democrats were entitled to wear the pin than were Republicans. So he decided to ignore the rule, start wearing it himself and encouraged his fellow Republicans to join him in this deception.

And, of course, a *lot* of people were fooled into thinking Republicans were military veterans.

As far as I know that rule has never been changed.


24601

(3,962 posts)
16. Never heard the veteran connection - especially with prominent non-veteran Presidents wearing
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 09:03 PM
Feb 2012

them. Can you please cite some sources?

 

ieoeja

(9,748 posts)
17. Sources: lots of (probably deceased now) members of American Legion Post #120, Loogootee, IN.
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 12:26 PM
Feb 2012

A lot of these guys, my father included, were furious when Gingrich started doing that. So far as they were concerned Gingrich was pretending to be a veteran.

Everybody does it now, of course. Gingrich and company took that symbol away from the veterans.


 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
18. Something a bit more confirmable is required.
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 02:02 PM
Feb 2012

I've been AD USAF for 21+ years and I've never heard of your claims.

24601

(3,962 posts)
21. Loogootee, IN had a Cinderella HS BB team in what, 1975? No disrespect to your dad & my fellow
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 07:45 PM
Feb 2012

vets, but I had 25 years in uniform and never heard that one. Plenty to dislike about Gingrich - but I wouldn't include that. He was elected ion 1978 - and according to Time, the lapel pins predate that.

"It was during the culture wars of the late '60s and early '70s that the flag lapel pin truly took off and became the simultaneously uniting and divisive symbol that it is today. Republican candidates in the 1970 congressional race wore them as a symbol of patriotic solidarity against anti-Vietnam protesters like Abbie Hoffman — who donned a shirt made of the flag — or others who stitched the flag onto the seat of their pants. But it was Richard Nixon who brought the pin to national attention. According to Stephen E. Ambrose's biography Nixon, the President got the idea for sporting a lapel pin from his chief of staff, H.R. Haldeman, who had noticed a similar gesture in the Robert Redford film The Candidate. Nixon commanded all of his aides to go and do likewise. The flag pins were noticed by the public, and many in Nixon's supposed "silent majority" began to similarly sport flags on their lapels. Over the next few decades, the pin sporadically surged in popularity. During the Gulf War, they sold briskly alongside flag patches and yellow ribbons."

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1820023,00.html

onenote

(42,733 posts)
25. Do you have a link?
Sat Feb 25, 2012, 10:18 AM
Feb 2012

I was working on Capitol Hill when Gingrich was speaker and I can tell you I certainly never heard such a story. Newt's as low as they get. Don't need to make up stuff to make him look bad.

Old Troop

(1,991 posts)
20. Let them lie as long as they aren't hurting anyone by fraud or otherwise.
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 06:46 PM
Feb 2012

When I retired from AD after 27 years, I put away the uniforms, medals & ribbons, plaques and certificates and concentrated on the future. The only thing displayed in our home reminding us of our military career is a picture of our quarters at Ft Benning when I was a major. My wife likes it because the photo is composed so well and she loved that house.
It's pretty easy to detect the liars -- ask them where they were and they usually say, "I was all over that damned place" or "It was a black op that I still can't talk about."

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court conflicted ...