Rollie Chance, misidentified as Navy Yard shooter, demands media accountability
Source: Washington Post
Rollie Chance was home in Stafford, about 40 miles south of Washington, when he began watching the news about the shootings at the Washington Navy Yard Monday morning. A retired Navy lieutenant, he had worked in Building 197 on the fourth floor and was worried that some of his friends and former colleagues might have been killed.
Then shortly after noon, he got a phone call from someone who said they were with ABC News. They asked me if I knew Rollie Chance, Rollie Chance said. Then they said, Did you know Rollie Chance was the perpetrator of the Washington Navy Yard shootings?
Chance, 50, thought the call was a joke. He told the caller, I guarantee you 100 percent Rollie Chance didnt do it, and hung up.
Moments later, FBI agents arrived at his home. Soon after, reporters began piling up at the curb. And on Twitter, reporters for both NBC and CBS named Chance as the now-deceased killer. CBS also identified Chance on national radio. ABC, which called Chance, did not report any connection.
Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/rollie-chance-misidentified-as-navy-yard-shooter-demands-media-accountability/2013/09/20/7226087e-221b-11e3-966c-9c4293c47ebe_story.html
In 1996, there was Richard Jewell.
In 2012, the other James Holmes.
In 2013, that New York Post cover falsely accusing two young men of being the Boston Bombers and then this latest victim of false perp identification.
When will it EVER end?
Skittles
(153,174 posts)Last edited Sat Sep 21, 2013, 02:51 AM - Edit history (1)
referring to him as a "person of interest" - but it wasn't him
Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)How does that work?
busterbrown
(8,515 posts)AAO
(3,300 posts)Skittles
(153,174 posts)DallasNE
(7,403 posts)They are the one's releasing the unverified information. It is one of the reasons to be skeptical of unnamed sources for the data in news stories. There is no disincentive to releasing unverified information. Same with the AR-15 information that was not corrected for 2 days. Police on the scene knew that the shell casings were from a shotgun rather than an AR-15 yet a false picture was painted of the crime scene and for what purpose. We all know that journalists have become stenographers and print whatever self-serving thing authorities want published.
tblue37
(65,458 posts)irresponsible journalists each to have their share.
The "news" media are so focused on getting the scoop first that they simply will not wait to confirm their information, and if the information is sensational, they are even more desperate to be the first ones to report it.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,027 posts)Rollie Chance has been unfairly and mistakenly identified as the shooter instead of the real shooter at the Navy Yard.
By mentioning his full name in threads and on pages that clear his name, those pages (such as this one) will rise up over and above other pages that have the mistake without the correction. Also, cross-link to other pages, like the OP did, and the cross-linked page will rise in search engine listings.
tclambert
(11,087 posts)Gotta get that story out first! No time to check the facts. You want facts? Read a weekly news magazine.
surrealAmerican
(11,362 posts)It seems like a few seconds on the phone kept them from making a big mistake. Why could none of the other news sources do the same?
HuskyOffset
(890 posts)...got a busy signal when they called, because ABC got in first and was talking to him. Now, they could have waited, oh, say, 20 seconds or so and tried again, and kept trying until they got through, but that's sooo much work. Much easier and quicker to just go with the wrong name and wreck some unsuspecting person's life.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)iandhr
(6,852 posts)When one of the people who are falsely accused sues and gets a lot of money.
jakeXT
(10,575 posts)AngryOldDem
(14,061 posts)He is a private citizen. The bar is not that high to claim libel, especially if he can prove that he has been directly harmed by this. Shouldn't be too hard, I would think.
Just one more consequence of the 24/7 news culture. Everyone must be "first" with the story, which means fact-checking and waiting for official confirmation are the first things to go.
And saying, "Whoops! My bad!" after you plaster someone's face all over a story about a heinous crime just does not cut it.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)is for those media outlets to be forced to pay him so much money that he never has to work again.
And that will solve the Google problem too, when the first several hits become "Rollie Chance, unjustly accused, awarded $10 million in libel damages".
And this kind of award will make the media a lot more careful going forward.
RebelOne
(30,947 posts)I would be contacting an attorney.