Headshop owner guilty of selling illegal synthetic drugs
Source: Star Tribune
A Duluth headshop owner was found guilty of selling banned synthetic drugs Monday afternoon in a case likely to have major impact on the handling of these designer drug products.
Jim Carlson, 56, owner of the Last Place on Earth, was found guilty on 51 of 55 felony counts. His girlfriend, Lava Marie Haugen, 33, was convicted on all four counts against her, including conspiracy. Carlsons son, Joseph James Gellerman, 35, was convicted of two of four counts against him, but not guilty of conspiracy.
The trial lasted two weeks, and the seven-woman, five-man jury deliberated for about two days over the 55 felony counts.
The verdict is likely to have impact on other cases involving the sale of synthetic drugs, partly because few cases make it to trial. Defendants often plead guilty, and prosecutions have proved complex because of the nature of synthetic drugs. The drugs molecular composition is altered so frequently that outlawed addictive substances are replaced by addictive substances that have not been outlawed.
Read more: http://www.startribune.com/local/226299171.html
This guy's business has really taken a toll on downtown Duluth. I'm happy he's been convicted.
maxsolomon
(33,360 posts)which, in the case of Wall St., is The American Way.
I note that the specific banned substances he sold are not listed in the article. Legalized Marijuana would make 80-90% of this Bath Salts argy-bargy go away.
Out of curiousity: can you provide specific examples of the "toll on downtown Duluth"?
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)the Last Place on Earth. There was also a police car outside 24/7 to deal with people. No one wanted to be there.
Totally agree about legalized marijuana. Carlson said the same himself.
maxsolomon
(33,360 posts)Its an open-air drug market in the middle of a world famous tourist/shopping district, known to it's habitues as "The Blade". The disorder is so brazen and frequent that the police can't/won't stop it. There's little point, and oddly enough, there's little danger to the public at large.
Doesn't stop retail sales.
Man up, Duluth! (I'm half-kidding...)
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)gone home, it wouldn't have been an issue. But they were harassing passersby, shitting in the hallways at other businesses, trashing public bathrooms, trashing private bathrooms and so on. And it's not necessarily a tourist area, where they were; more of a downtown area.
If it were pot, it wouldn't have been an issue. It was bath salts, and so shit got cray.
maxsolomon
(33,360 posts)Sorry you all had our experience!
leftyladyfrommo
(18,869 posts)My very favorite two word combination. It's just such wonderful descriptive phrase.
madrchsod
(58,162 posts)the shit they sell is deadly. if you don't die first after a while you wish you were.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)New Zealand Regulates -- Not Bans -- Synthetic Drugs
by Phillip Smith, August 09, 2013, 05:32pm, (Issue #796)
Like other countries around the world, New Zealand has been grappling with the rise of the new synthetic drugs, such as the stimulant-type drugs known as "bath salts." Unlike other countries around the world, including the United States, Kiwi lawmakers have responded not by attempting to ban them out of existence, but moving instead to regulate them.
"Regulating psychoactive substances will help protect the health of, and minimize harm to, individuals who use these substances," said the Ministry of Health in support of the bill.
Passed on July 17 and put into effect the following day, the Psychoactive Substance Act of 2013 creates a new government agency, the Psychoactive Substances Regulatory Authority, to ensure that the new synthetics meet safety standards before going to market. The Authority is also charged with developing, implementing, and administering a licensing scheme for researchers, retailers, wholesalers, manufacturers, and importers.
That means that instead of sending in SWAT teams to bust underground synthetic drug labs, New Zealand will allow the drugs to be legally manufactured under strict regulations. But those seeking to manufacture them legally will have to demonstrate that they pose a low risk to consumers, including undergoing rigorous clinical trials to determine toxicity and addictiveness, and subsequent approval by an independent expert advisory committee.
"Simply banning these drugs only incentivizes producers to develop drugs that get around the law -- regardless of what they will do to the people that take them," said Ross Bell, executive director of the New Zealand Drug Foundation. "This model incentivizes producers to develop drugs that are safer. We think that's a much smarter way to go about it."
Under the new law, regulations on the sale and purchase of the new synthetics immediately went into effect, including a ban on sales to people under 18, a ban on sales in convenience stores, and requirements for labeling and packaging, including mandatory health warnings.
"This represents a potentially transformative breakthrough in the legal regulation of drugs that typically have been criminalized with little forethought," said Ethan Nadelmann, executive director of the US Drug Policy Alliance. "It pokes an important hole in the edifice of drug prohibition."
Other countries may be interested in enlarging that hole, the Associated Press reported last week. It cited interest in the New Zealand model among Australian and British parliamentarians and quoted bill sponsor MP Peter Dunne as saying others were interested, too.
"The Hungarians, the Irish, the British, they're all keen to know what we are up to," he said. "It's seen as cutting edge. They want to see how it works, and view it for their own country."
Auckland
New Zealand
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)...for truth, justice, and the right to sell strange drugs to people who want them. And make a nice profit. It's All-American.