Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

tpsbmam

(3,927 posts)
Mon Feb 27, 2012, 06:05 PM Feb 2012

Citing ‘Impossible Timeline,’ Walker Campaign Won’t File Challenge Against Recall Signatures



The campaign of Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R) announced Monday — the deadline today to submit challenges against the signatures to recall him — that they will not file any challenge, saying that they did not have enough time to fully review the more than one-million signatures filed against him.

This decision comes a week and a half after Dane County Judge Richard Niess, who had previously granted a 20-day extension to the Walker campaign for the review period, refused their request for another two weeks.

“We faced an impossible timeline,” Walker campaign spokeswoman Ciara Matthews told WisPolitics. She also added: “It obviously takes more time to verify signatures than it does to collect them.”

-snip-

On a conference call with reporters, state Democratic Party chairman Mike Tate fired back at the Walker campaign, saying that today’s move disproves the Republicans’ previous rhetoric alleging fraud in the signatures.


The rest is at TPM.
link:http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/02/citing-impossible-timeline-walker-wont-file-challenge-against-recall-signatures.php?ref=fpnewsfeed

The law gave Walker 10 days to review the signatures starting from when the petitions are filed. A judge restarted the clock until all of the Government Accountability Board (GAB) could deliver the required number of copies of the vast numbers of petitions. And then the judge granted Walker et. al. an extra 20 days for review. He denied them the further two week extension they requested 2/15 according to TPM. (The same judge gave the GAB and extra 30 days -- they have until 3/12).

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Citing ‘Impossible Timeline,’ Walker Campaign Won’t File Challenge Against Recall Signatures (Original Post) tpsbmam Feb 2012 OP
Guess they could not find any bogus signatures. LOL appleannie1 Feb 2012 #1
They're trying to handle it like a union election Gman Feb 2012 #2
IOW, they couldn't find any bogus signatures to crow about. blm Feb 2012 #3
OR... FedUp_Queer Feb 2012 #4
Thank you for your concern. aquart Feb 2012 #6
I hope you're right. FedUp_Queer Feb 2012 #7
Didn't even bother doing a random sampling? Old and In the Way Feb 2012 #5

Gman

(24,780 posts)
2. They're trying to handle it like a union election
Mon Feb 27, 2012, 06:20 PM
Feb 2012

And delay things as long as possible through any number if ways to delay things. Then they tie it up in court.

 

FedUp_Queer

(975 posts)
4. OR...
Mon Feb 27, 2012, 06:24 PM
Feb 2012

They don't think the Democrats have a viable opponent. Damn, I hope they find a good one to kick him to the curb.

aquart

(69,014 posts)
6. Thank you for your concern.
Mon Feb 27, 2012, 06:48 PM
Feb 2012

But I'm guessing a pretty pink sock puppet would win against Walker right now.

 

FedUp_Queer

(975 posts)
7. I hope you're right.
Mon Feb 27, 2012, 06:58 PM
Feb 2012

The landscape is littered with office holders who "couldn't win." I'm not concerned with who votes, but who counts the votes.

Old and In the Way

(37,540 posts)
5. Didn't even bother doing a random sampling?
Mon Feb 27, 2012, 06:40 PM
Feb 2012

They could have checked 500 and gotten a reasonably accurate understanding of the probabilities on the entire population. Seems like they'd do that 1st and if there were, say 50% bad signatures, they'd have the basis to demand the time necessary to verify all of the signatures. The fact that they didn't tells me they know they are legit. I'm surprised the Democrats didn't do a statistical analysis to see if a random sample proved they had a valid number of signatures in case they were challenged by the Republicans.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Citing ‘Impossible Timeli...