The Claimant is the ex-spouse of an Asian Head of State. A Head of State that is considered a
strategic ali to the UK. As these proceedings are anonymised it would clearly be inappropriate in
the context of this submission to reveal her identity. I will also take careful steps to avoid
calculation of her identity although it’s quite clear that there is already a significant amount of
unsavoury publicity about this person already in the pubic domain. A fact that makes the superinjunction
referred to in this submission somewhat questionable.
...
Information/allegations relating to steps taken by the Claimant to secure
payment of a £61m judgment debt from members of her family, of which I am
the beneficiary (including the fact that such steps have been taken at all);
...
Any information calculated to identify the Claimant as the claimant in English
proceedings against another individual or as the plaintiff in Australian
proceedings against another individual, whom has since been assassinated, and a
company that he controlled;
...
That the Claimant had been the victim of sexual harassment by a high profile UK
Arab businessman and former proprietor of a substantial UK retailer;

http://www.parliament.uk/documents/joint-committees/Privacy_and_Injunctions/JCPIWrittenEvWeb.pdf