Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 11:47 AM Oct 2013

AP Fires Third Employee After Retracted McAuliffe Report

Source: TPM

CAITLIN MACNEAL – OCTOBER 22, 2013, 10:53 AM EDT

The Associated Press has fired a third employee due to a false report about Terry McAuliffe's role in a fraud scheme, the Huffington Post reports.

The AP fired a reporter and editor on Monday after retracting a report that claimed the Virginia gubernatorial candidate lied to a federal official who was investigating an insurance fraud scheme run by a real estate planner. McAuliffe was a passive investor, but didn't lie to the official or have an active role in the scheme.

The News Media Guild, which represents AP employees, is "alarmed" by the firings, according to the Huffington Post.

"The firings have alarmed AP employees nationwide, and the News Media Guild will vigorously enforce the contractual rights of the employees it represents," Guild president Martha Waggoner told the Huffington Post.


###

Read more: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/ap-fires-third-employee-after-false-mcauliffe-report

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

sharp_stick

(14,400 posts)
1. Why would it alarm employees
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 11:49 AM
Oct 2013

are all AP reporters and editors as idiotic as these ones? If I worked as lazily as this I'd probably get shit canned too.

yesphan

(1,588 posts)
3. Perhaps they're alarmed by the notion
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 11:55 AM
Oct 2013

that these people might be getting paid to lie. They are hired as reporters (journalists) when they are in fact
shills of a more sinister nature.
It might be worth a great deal of money to someone to get even false info out about
a political opponent.

calimary

(81,312 posts)
13. Like jonathan karl? Wondering if any of them came from the Collegiate Network?
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 04:24 PM
Oct 2013

I think they're rattled for another reason, too - although, full-disclosure here, I've been out of the AP since 1996 when I retired.

HOWEVER - when it was the Wire Service Guild (and I see it's changed now to News Media Guild so I'm not sure what the contract allows anymore), which it was when I worked there, it was almost impossible to be fired. That's one of the reasons I grabbed that job offer when they presented it. Long story, won't bore you, but...

The Wire Service Guild contract was A-FUCKIN'-MAZING!!! For broadcasting, for any media, for any contract. If you made permanent there, which you did after you survived a nine-month probation period, you were GOLDEN. You were like a tenured teacher. They could NOT fire you. We regarded it as like being in the Army. "Three-square a day and they can't fire you." Meaning - you did NOT aspire toward riches by working at the AP, BUT you had a pretty decent regular salary that kept food on your table and the wolves away from the door, AND the all-important JOB SECURITY!!!! I'd never heard of any such thing in my professional experience! Air talent was something that could be flitched off at a moment's notice, for no reason, out of the capriciousness of whatever management was there or had just flown in from Oklahoma City or some such place and thought they knew EVERYTHING about running a radio station in L.A. For example, I had one job from which I got fired after the ratings went UP. Go figure.

Soooooo... when I saw that "they can't fire you after you make permanent," I RAN, did not walk, to grab it. It meant management couldn't fuck with me anymore. They could nitpick you nearly to death. They could memo you and annoy you and overwork you and you had to settle for less pay for a harder job than your peers at the fancy network stations with the big salaries and exposure and ego glory (and no job security). We used to refer to it as "being eaten by ants." BUT THEY COULD NOT FIRE YOU. Unless of course you gunned down half the people in the building or something else really seriously awful. Sounded like a fair trade-off to me.

So if AP employees are getting fired, either the contract's been changed, OR this is one of those "something else really seriously awful" things that allowed for dismissal. And that will shake up a newsroom like the AP's, like nobody's business. There are lifers there. I worked with a woman whose 40-year party was held. They gave her a special pin in honor of that many years of service, and they had several denominations of them. Believe me, she had one of every denomination (for every five years). It was one of those increasingly rare jobs, even at this late date, in which you could hire on and then plan to settle in for the long term. You could work there til you retired. I lasted nine years - indeed the longest I'd spent at any job I'd ever had before.

I'm not so sure it's like that anymore, though. But there's enough of that mentality still inbred at the AP. You can settle in. You can make long-range plans. And you can get to feeling rather comfy, especially as you see your friends at the big radio stations and networks victimized by layoffs and downturns and management changes and ownership changes and flakiness in the market and flakiness in the ratings, and watch the heads roll down the corporate halls while you, on the other hand, were safe. I'm sure there are still those comfy feelings that come with job security - such as it is - at the AP, even if new guild contracts and changing times start messing with those things. So when there are firings - especially at an organization not accustomed to such things, it's REALLY shaking them up. But good.

sofa king

(10,857 posts)
12. Or maybe they have all done the same.
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 03:11 PM
Oct 2013

Like, just pulling an example from out of the air, the years 2001 through 2008, inclusive.

DallasNE

(7,403 posts)
11. Yet Jonathan Karl Can Use Doctored Email's To File A False Report By ABC
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 02:44 PM
Oct 2013

And be given increased responsibility by ABC. Then yesterday an uninformed Karl asks Press Secretary Jay Carney a question on Obamacare and when Carney straightened him out protests "I don't understand".

Here I don't support the News Media Guild's strong support of the fired employees. While I support a fair hearing for those fired, if the facts back up what we have been told these employees should be terminated. There must be integrity in news reporting and ABC has not come to grips with that fact yet so they keep on letting Karl sully their name.

 

Rain Mcloud

(812 posts)
16. Just like HuffPo and Drudgery,if they can copy and paste it then it must be true.
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 05:48 PM
Oct 2013

It is true isn't it?
You can't sue me,i did not write that libelous fishwrapper.
I was just the flea-flicker.

 

FairWinds

(1,717 posts)
17. I Don't trust AP any farther than I can throw them . .
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 06:31 PM
Oct 2013

they regularly bend and twist news to favor the righties.
Here's another good recent example . .
Pushing the "False Equivalence" meme .
http://www.sanduskyregister.com/article/4784981?topcomments=

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»AP Fires Third Employee A...