Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,900 posts)
Thu Oct 24, 2013, 02:15 PM Oct 2013

NY Court: Long Interrogation OK Before Terror Case

Source: Associated Press

NEW YORK October 24, 2013 (AP)
By LARRY NEUMEISTER Associated Press

In a boost to U.S. efforts to gain intelligence from terrorism suspects before prosecuting them, a federal appeals court on Thursday upheld the conviction of an ex-Guantanamo detainee in the 1998 bombings of two U.S. embassies in Africa.

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected arguments that Ahmed Khalfan Ghailani's long detention overseas by the Central Intelligence Agency violated his constitutional right to a speedy trial, concluding that he was properly convicted and sentenced to life in prison for his role in the attacks that killed 224 people, including a dozen Americans.

Ghailani's lawyer, Peter Quijano, promised a Supreme Court appeal.

The court seemed to embrace an opportunity to say that evidence necessary to prosecute in U.S. civilian courts and the legal rights of a defendant are not necessarily spoiled by efforts to obtain intelligence from terrorism suspects.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]


Read more: http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/ny-court-upholds-guantanamo-detainee-conviction-20668904

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NY Court: Long Interrogation OK Before Terror Case (Original Post) Eugene Oct 2013 OP
In case we forgot: The Stranger Oct 2013 #1
Eugene Diclotican Oct 2013 #2

The Stranger

(11,297 posts)
1. In case we forgot:
Thu Oct 24, 2013, 03:03 PM
Oct 2013
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

Diclotican

(5,095 posts)
2. Eugene
Thu Oct 24, 2013, 03:52 PM
Oct 2013

Eugene

I wonder what will happened - when the first US citizen - or an american soldier have been treated the same way - as a suspect for a criminal crime in the future - if it happened to others - it could happened to americans to...

But I guess - it is two standards for trials - for "the others" and americans in the US this days.. Specially if you have an arabic sounding name..

Diclotican

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»NY Court: Long Interrogat...