Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bananas

(27,509 posts)
Fri Oct 25, 2013, 12:46 PM Oct 2013

Human rights experts criticize U.N. report on Fukushima radiation

Source: Kyodo

Human rights experts including a U.N. special rapporteur on Thursday criticized a U.N. scientific report dismissing concerns about the effect of radiation from the Fukushima nuclear disaster on the general public in Japan.

Speaking at an event organized by U.S. and Japanese nongovernmental groups, U.N. Special Rapporteur on the right to health Anand Grover took issue with the report's conclusion that "there is nothing to worry about" for members of the public exposed to radiation after Fukushima.

<snip>

Mari Inoue, a representative of Tokyo-based Human Rights Now, meanwhile called for the UNSCEAR report to be revised.

<snip>

Also on Thursday, Human Rights Now released a statement signed by 64 community organizations in Japan calling for revisions to the report.

<snip>

Read more: http://mainichi.jp/english/english/newsselect/news/20131025p2g00m0dm028000c.html

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

bananas

(27,509 posts)
1. Human rights experts call for revisions to UN report on Fukushima radiation
Fri Oct 25, 2013, 12:50 PM
Oct 2013
http://japandailypress.com/human-rights-experts-call-for-revisions-to-un-report-on-fukushima-radiation-2538523/

Human rights experts call for revisions to UN report on Fukushima radiation

Oct 25, 2013 Ida Torres

Several human rights experts are disagreeing with the report set to be released by the U.N. Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) after their investigation into the situation at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant. The criticism stems from the report’s seeming lack of concern over the effects of radiation on the general public in Japan, saying that “no discernible increased incidence of radiation-related health effects are expected.”

U.N. Special Rapporteur on the right to health Anand Grover says that he strongly disagrees with the report’s conclusion that “there is nothing to worry about” in terms of those who were exposed to radiation after three of Fukushima’s nuclear reactors suffered a meltdown at the height of the disasters of March 2011. Grover visited Japan last year and made his own report on the human rights perspective of the disaster. He says there is no adequate data on radioactive exposure to say that there will be no long-term harmful effects even in low dose cases. He emphasized that the affected communities, most of whom have still not been able to return to their hometowns, have to be involved in the decision-making process and that this is a “core obligation” of the government.

Mari Inoue, representing human rights group Human Rights Now also called for the UNSCEAR report to be revised as she believes the areas that exceed one millisievert of radiation per year should also be evacuated. The current standard being followed by the government is just at 20 millisieverts. The Tokyo-based group released a statement signed by 64 community organizations that are also calling for revisions to the report. Inoue also called for further study on workers that are still being exposed to radiation as well as an acknowledgement that it is still far too early to rule out future health complications due to exposure. The UNSCEAR report, called “the most comprehensive scientific analysis of the information available to date,” will be published later this year.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
2. If there's nothing to worry about, why the lack of reports showing all is well?
Fri Oct 25, 2013, 09:47 PM
Oct 2013

Most of the reports I see mentioned online indicating the spaghetti has hit the nuclear fan -- children with cesium in their urine, growths on their thyroid glands, etc. -- never see the light of the nightly nooze. Odd how they only broadcast the good news the UN expert found.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
3. If people knew the truth, they would panic
Fri Oct 25, 2013, 11:03 PM
Oct 2013

or at least the gov. fears they would.
And gov. in other countries would not want a flood of "radiation refugees".
There was a lot of fear that evacuees from Fukishima area would contaminate otter people, remember?

We are going out with a whimper....not a bang.

Sirveri

(4,517 posts)
4. So someone with no training on the health effects is going against those with training.
Sat Oct 26, 2013, 08:54 PM
Oct 2013

Why should I care what someone who isn't an expert in this field has to say about this subject? It's like listening to a mathematician discuss why evolution is wrong.

 

Humanist_Activist

(7,670 posts)
8. Uhm, how can something that has been well researched for the past 60 years or so be covered up?
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 03:30 AM
Oct 2013

If you want to talk about radiation levels, is the government now confiscating Geiger counters?

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
9. Why of course....
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 01:29 PM
Oct 2013

History has shown bad news is always fully exposed no matter what profits are injured or what may happen to the business end.

So, why do nuke supporters often regale that no one has ever been killed by nuclear power in the US?

Tell us, Human, is it true no one has ever been killed by nuclear power in the US?

 

Humanist_Activist

(7,670 posts)
10. Can you point to the post where I claimed that nuclear power is 100% safe?
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 05:39 PM
Oct 2013

Because I would LOVE, absolutely love, to see it so I can correct myself. Or does your world view only revolve around "nuclear, BAD! non-nuclear, GOOD!"

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
11. Can you answer the question?
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 07:50 PM
Oct 2013

Seems to me that the evidence of injuries from nuclear power in the US has been covered up and hidden.

Only a damned idiot would think nuclear power is 100% safe. But we have had many here claim that there have been no deaths from nuclear in the US, so I was just wondering what you thought since you seem so interested in all this.

 

Humanist_Activist

(7,670 posts)
7. I would be more impressed if these were actual experts in nuclear physics...
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 03:29 AM
Oct 2013

or some other related field.

Indeed, I'm not entirely sure where human rights enter the picture on the scientific findings of a nuclear accident.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Human rights experts crit...