Warming report sees violent, sicker, poorer future
Source: Associated Press
Nov 2, 4:23 PM EDT
Warming report sees violent, sicker, poorer future
By SETH BORENSTEIN
AP Science Writer
WASHINGTON (AP) -- A leaked draft of an international scientific report forecasts that man-made global warming likely will worsen already existing human tragedies of war, starvation, poverty, flooding, extreme weather and disease.
The Nobel Peace Prize-winning Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change will issue a report next March on how global warming is already affecting the way people live and what will happen in the future, including a worldwide drop in income. A leaked copy of a draft of the report's summary appeared online Friday. Governments will spend the next few months making comments about the draft.
The report details specific effects of warming and how countries and people can adapt to some of them. The American scientist who heads the report, Chris Field, says experts paint a dramatic contrast of possible futures.
Read more: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_SCI_CLIMATE_IMPACTS?SECTION=HOME&SITE=AP&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
(Short article, no more at link.)
hollysmom
(5,946 posts)Even without global warming, I see more hatred in people every day.
And I consider myself an optimist.
pscot
(21,024 posts)They're getting ready for a climate meltdown. If the tropics get too hot we could see 200 million climate refugees clamoring for succor. That report also says the tipping point is very near.
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)encouraging thrift, properly storing food, finding ways to help each other. That would be real homeland security.
I have a feeling that's not their focus.
pscot
(21,024 posts)jtuck004
(15,882 posts)Big shipping container, a bunch of 2U's in a rack running hundreds of virtual servers connect to the world, powered by several methods, buried fiber to all the houses in your community, (can tell Comcast and all the others to get bent) everyone gets tutorials on anything they wish 24x7, big potluck on Saturdays at the Grange...
hmmm
pscot
(21,024 posts)at the helm.
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)Bortman33
(102 posts)Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism, Green, Socialism . . . . . . . . . . two words that must lead the next revolution!
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)rejected that, back in the pre-New Deal Days, wanted the workers to control the decisions and investments. Something more along the lines of a cooperative, maybe like Mondragon, but with care not to become so attached to the structure outside that you risk what you have - still, anything better than supporting the wealthy and pretending it's capitalism run in a democracy, eh?
Skittles
(153,169 posts)a rightwing version of what constitutes liberalism
Bortman33
(102 posts)with Einstein on Socialism and who the hell listens to the right wing anyway, unless of course, you want to decipher which path not to follow.
From Wikipedia
"I am convinced there is only one way to eliminate (the) grave evils (of capitalism), namely through the establishment of a socialist economy, accompanied by an educational system which would be oriented toward social goals. In such an economy, the means of production are owned by society itself and are utilized in a planned fashion. A planned economy, which adjusts production to the needs of the community, would distribute the work to be done among all those able to work and would guarantee a livelihood to every man, woman, and child. The education of the individual, in addition to promoting his own innate abilities, would attempt to develop in him a sense of responsibility for his fellow-men in place of the glorification of power and success in our present society."
Albert Einstein, Why Socialism?, 1949 [41]
Socialistlemur
(770 posts)Maybe he could have made it work better than the Soviets, the Chinese, or the Cubans did. I like socialism, but I also see quite a bit of naive thinking regarding how to implement it or how to avoid more failures.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)the 1% ruling while we starve etc. Capitalism does not work in an era of scarcity. We can see that in the nations we used to call third world. They only appear to work because they are our labor force. If and when we no longer buy the products they make the will look like our ghost towns with one exception - they will still be populated.
longship
(40,416 posts)sakabatou
(42,152 posts)gopiscrap
(23,761 posts)jsr
(7,712 posts)hatrack
(59,587 posts)But who cares? The Twitter IPO launches today! WOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!