They usually have to shoot someone to get an automatic walk.

Last edited Sat Nov 9, 2013, 12:17 PM - Edit history (1)

The SUV driver was clearly the victim. It's all shown in the video.

The biker intentionally bumped (allegedly) the SUV by breaking in front of the SUV. The biker didn't go down.

At that time the SUV had already slowed way down to what had to have been way under the legal speed limit to avoid any contact. They captured the SUV in the middle of a busy freeway in the travel lanes - that's bizarre. The smashed belligerent rider was illegally blocking the SUV's escape from the hostile mob and deserved what he got.

He had every right to run over anyone who was part of that gang, in order to get his family and himself to safety.

even for rich Manhattanites.

biker. That biker didn't even lose his seat. He ran over another biker when, after he stopped, a group of the bikers began surrounding his SUV, pounding on his car, slashing at his tires and trying to open his doors.

The SUV driver had his wife and a two year old child in the car. He very understandably took off at that point and ran over a biker who had dismounted to join in the fray. He was justifiably afraid for his life and the lives of his family.

edited to add video link:

I can't think of anyone whose life's work could be more diametrically opposed to Rand Paul than Harry Chapin.

Good one

The guy had his two year old daughter in the car when he was surrounded by a mob. What was he supposed to do?

Why was a grand jury even needed? Is this being tried as a federal case?

they have to be indicted by a grand jury.

may justice be served. Gang intimidation must be addressed.