Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,994 posts)
Fri Jan 3, 2014, 05:56 PM Jan 2014

Senator (Bernie Sanders) presses NSA to reveal whether it spies on members of Congress •

Source: The Guardian

Senator presses NSA to reveal whether it spies on members of Congress
• Vermont's Bernie Sanders poses question to spy agency
• NSA entering political minefield as it fights to keep programs

A US senator has bluntly asked the National Security Agency if it spies on Congress, raising the stakes for the surveillance agency’s legislative fight to preserve its broad surveillance powers.

Bernie Sanders, a Vermont independent and socialist, asked army general Keith Alexander, the NSA’s outgoing director, if the NSA “has spied, or is the NSA currently spying, on members of Congress or other American elected officials”.

Sanders, in a letter dated 3 January, http://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/is-the-nsa-spying-on-congress defined “spying” as “gathering metadata on calls made from official or personal phones, content from websites visited or emails sent, or collecting any other data from a third party not made available to the general public in the regular course of business”.

The NSA collects the records of every phone call made and received inside the United States on an ongoing, daily basis, a revelation first published in the Guardian in June based on leaks from whistleblower Edward Snowden. Until 2011, the NSA collected the email and internet records of all Americans as well.

Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jan/03/nsa-asked-spying-congress-bernie-sanders?CMP=twt_gu

63 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Senator (Bernie Sanders) presses NSA to reveal whether it spies on members of Congress • (Original Post) kpete Jan 2014 OP
Blackmail and extortion is the name of the game notadmblnd Jan 2014 #1
That sounds about right, unfortunately. nt freedom fighter jh Jan 2014 #7
All according to plan. OnyxCollie Jan 2014 #8
Cheney had all spied on Rosa Luxemburg Jan 2014 #27
For a party that used to be a huge advocate for privacy rights, there sure is a short list of adirondacker Jan 2014 #2
As I was recently informed, that's because they are "reality-based" Maedhros Jan 2014 #4
"reality-based" Fuck that! They are in the fucking Twilight Zone. L0oniX Jan 2014 #54
We can no longer think of the Democratic Party as the party for the people. There rhett o rick Jan 2014 #6
Yeah Titonwan Jan 2014 #16
1947 actually 2banon Jan 2014 #25
I thought about that Titonwan Jan 2014 #43
"You either die a hero, christx30 Jan 2014 #45
Excellent quote, quite appropo 2banon Jan 2014 #48
A good man. /nt Ash_F Jan 2014 #3
I'd like to know how many of them get insider info from Wall St. banksters wordpix Jan 2014 #5
Republicans congress members were caught inside trading . . . aggiesal Jan 2014 #33
He is wasting his time other than for the symbolism and perhaps trapping him, asking Alexander sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #9
We must assume that of course they spy on members of Congress SaltyBro Jan 2014 #10
Good luck with that Bernie. progressoid Jan 2014 #11
Per Digby, the NSA has already spied on two Senators in the past deminks Jan 2014 #12
I've known since the early 1990s bucolic_frolic Jan 2014 #13
Northern Exposure.. I loved this show, great episode. 2banon Jan 2014 #29
And for the record bucolic_frolic Jan 2014 #14
Impossible that Congressional (or any) metadata would be exempted, so the answer is yes. MADem Jan 2014 #15
There is 'collecting' and then there is 'spying'. ronnie624 Jan 2014 #38
Well, Sanders has done a little lumping in the letter. MADem Jan 2014 #39
the point I think, is who in congress was tapped WITHOUT a warrant. 2banon Jan 2014 #62
How could they, though? Once they get past the "metadata" business, with the little MADem Jan 2014 #63
This message was self-deleted by its author MADem Jan 2014 #39
This message was self-deleted by its author MADem Jan 2014 #39
Exactly at the heart of the issue.. 2banon Jan 2014 #49
Yes. 'Spying' is a diversion from the over-arching issue. ronnie624 Jan 2014 #60
When McConnell calls John Boehner, I'm sure they have nothing to hide.... Mustellus Jan 2014 #17
Of course they spy on congress. AtheistCrusader Jan 2014 #18
Outstanding Bernie Sanders! Bravo! Another true American Hero and Patriot! 2banon Jan 2014 #19
Video; NSA Surveillance in Europe - European Parliament Hearing on NSA Surveillance and EU Citizens mitty14u2 Jan 2014 #20
Thank Jeebus for Bernie Sanders... AzDar Jan 2014 #21
Didn't Clapper lie to Congress, and wasn't that fine? MannyGoldstein Jan 2014 #22
maybe if he perjures himself repeatedly questionseverything Jan 2014 #24
Awesome video, thanks! MannyGoldstein Jan 2014 #30
sorry i didn't see this last night questionseverything Jan 2014 #52
Greenwald SamKnause Jan 2014 #51
This is America. Everyone lies. That's why they call it "The Great Satan". L0oniX Jan 2014 #57
Can we politely ask for some lost emails (from the Bushies)? erronis Jan 2014 #23
Hear, Here! Well Done! 2banon Jan 2014 #34
oooooo... i see what you did there. nt. druidity33 Jan 2014 #42
Sanders for President 2016 !!!! orpupilofnature57 Jan 2014 #26
This should be fun. n/t winter is coming Jan 2014 #28
Still peddling the tired, worn, tattered "Meta Data" talking point. n/t GoneFishin Jan 2014 #31
Apparently there are some who know things you don't know. L0oniX Jan 2014 #59
That's a great link. I saved that one. nt GoneFishin Jan 2014 #61
Maybe yes, maybe no agentS Jan 2014 #32
Sen. Sanders can hardly lift his phone from the weight of all the bugs crammed into it tclambert Jan 2014 #35
...like I could give a shit. SoapBox Jan 2014 #36
exactly - there are a lot more important things than keeping America a liberal western democracy - Douglas Carpenter Jan 2014 #37
Ha! Titonwan Jan 2014 #44
You actually believe that NSA depends on the FISA Court permission for "Listening"? 2banon Jan 2014 #50
I know ...I almost spewed my coffee on that one. L0oniX Jan 2014 #56
LMFAO L0oniX Jan 2014 #55
of course they do! wildbilln864 Jan 2014 #46
K&R Solly Mack Jan 2014 #47
You can bet that if we get a repuke POTUS the NSA will be spying on Dems... L0oniX Jan 2014 #53
Alexander will say something like "not to my knowledge", which pretty much TwilightGardener Jan 2014 #58

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
1. Blackmail and extortion is the name of the game
Fri Jan 3, 2014, 06:04 PM
Jan 2014

I feel certain that it's been SOP in Congress for a long time.

adirondacker

(2,921 posts)
2. For a party that used to be a huge advocate for privacy rights, there sure is a short list of
Fri Jan 3, 2014, 06:06 PM
Jan 2014

members who are questioning the system.

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
4. As I was recently informed, that's because they are "reality-based"
Fri Jan 3, 2014, 06:10 PM
Jan 2014

and I am apparently wild-eyed and naive for being concerned.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
6. We can no longer think of the Democratic Party as the party for the people. There
Fri Jan 3, 2014, 06:14 PM
Jan 2014

are two factions in this class civil war, the wealthy elite and the peons. It isnt Democrats per se doing the spying. Gen Clapper and Gen Alexander are not Democrats. The spy agencies are not interested in upholding the Constitution, their mission is to keep the wealthy elite safe. There is every reason to spy on Congress-Critters. You better believe that if Sen Sanders had anything to hide he wouldnt have asked the question. Of course there is a short list speaking out.

I think there is a good chance that we have had a silent coup and the NSA and other "Intelligence" agencies run this country.

Titonwan

(785 posts)
16. Yeah
Fri Jan 3, 2014, 07:18 PM
Jan 2014

It started in 1963. That's when presidents started to lean forward in their seats while taking instructions.

 

2banon

(7,321 posts)
25. 1947 actually
Fri Jan 3, 2014, 10:16 PM
Jan 2014

but I take your meaning. They really had it put together well enough by 1963, in order to pull that off and get away with it scott free. (no insult intended to Scotts)

Titonwan

(785 posts)
43. I thought about that
Sat Jan 4, 2014, 10:09 AM
Jan 2014

but decided on the actual event that crystalized just how much power the intelligence services have. The OSS birthed a monster we thought we could control.

"Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you."
Friedrich Nietzsche

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
5. I'd like to know how many of them get insider info from Wall St. banksters
Fri Jan 3, 2014, 06:14 PM
Jan 2014

That's how a lot of them get rich quick and manipulate legislation to their benefit.

aggiesal

(8,916 posts)
33. Republicans congress members were caught inside trading . . .
Sat Jan 4, 2014, 12:39 AM
Jan 2014

When Speaker Pelosi tried to make it illegal, she got backlash and could never make it illegal.

Then in 2012 Obama passed a law cracking down on insider trading on Capitol Hill
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303299604577323703044261464

A year later in 2013, congress quietly repealed the heart of the law
http://nyulocal.com/national/2013/04/15/congress-quietly-repeals-congressional-insider-trading-ban/

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
9. He is wasting his time other than for the symbolism and perhaps trapping him, asking Alexander
Fri Jan 3, 2014, 06:32 PM
Jan 2014

anything. He has already lied to Congress, he's an old Bush loyalist and should have been FIRED when we threw out Republicans five years ago now.

He should ask Snowden. HE is the one who is most likely to tell the truth.

Remember people laughing when it was revealed that they could or had spied on Obama? I bet no one is laughing now.

It's a good ploy though, get him on the record, lying or not, as we have Clapper on the record lying, and then being exposed as a liar.

It's possible Bernie already knows the answer. I am pretty sure we all do.

deminks

(11,014 posts)
12. Per Digby, the NSA has already spied on two Senators in the past
Fri Jan 3, 2014, 06:49 PM
Jan 2014
http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2014/01/even-senators-have-to-wonder.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

n case you are wondering why Sanders would inquire about such a matter, recall these documents that were finally released by the government just two and a half months ago:

The National Security Agency eavesdropped on civil rights icon Martin Luther King and heavyweight boxer Muhammad Ali as well as other leading critics of the Vietnam War in a secret program later deemed "disreputable," declassified documents revealed Wednesday.

The six-year spying program, dubbed "Minaret," had been exposed in the 1970s but the targets of the surveillance had been kept secret until now.

The documents showed the NSA tracked King and his colleague Whitney Young, boxing star Ali, journalists from the New York Times and the Washington Post, and two members of Congress, Senator Frank Church of Idaho and Senator Howard Baker of Tennessee.

(end snip)



bucolic_frolic

(43,173 posts)
14. And for the record
Fri Jan 3, 2014, 06:59 PM
Jan 2014

Sanders' party affiliation is Socialist.

He knows they spy on him.

They've been spying on the lefties
since about 1900

Debs, Goldman, the Wobblies ... or am I
misremembering history again?

If they could turn all their information into a memory aid
for citizens, we'd probably gladly pay a fee for it!

MADem

(135,425 posts)
15. Impossible that Congressional (or any) metadata would be exempted, so the answer is yes.
Fri Jan 3, 2014, 07:04 PM
Jan 2014

It would be more difficult to cut out 535 phone numbers x, what, five or ten, figuring there are multiple lines going into the individual offices in the legislature, plus home and cell phone lines, from the meta data base, than to just gather it all up and in.

Now, if the question is, did NSA ask for a FISA warrant on any Congresspeople, now, THAT answer, if yes, would be interesting!

ronnie624

(5,764 posts)
38. There is 'collecting' and then there is 'spying'.
Sat Jan 4, 2014, 03:58 AM
Jan 2014

Obviously the 'metadata' of everyone who talks on a phone or browses the internet is being collected. I think the question is, are US political leaders being targeted for spying by having their 'metadata' examined by someone with the ability to do so. That would be the 'spying' part.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
39. Well, Sanders has done a little lumping in the letter.
Sat Jan 4, 2014, 04:07 AM
Jan 2014

By his definition, the answer is yes even if no one got a warrant for a phone tap on any line.

Edit--for some reason, this post posted THREE times, all with the same post number, so I deleted two of 'em (below). Weird--reminded me of DU2! That used to happen on occasion back in the day.

 

2banon

(7,321 posts)
62. the point I think, is who in congress was tapped WITHOUT a warrant.
Sat Jan 4, 2014, 10:03 PM
Jan 2014

if there were actual warrants on a congress critter, that would mighty interesting too. But I suspect Bernie is actually pointing to a practice to which there exists no oversight and accountability.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
63. How could they, though? Once they get past the "metadata" business, with the little
Sat Jan 4, 2014, 10:54 PM
Jan 2014

"connect-the-dots" phone tree, they have to go to FISA in order to actually tap. Now, the whole lack of an adversarial approach to obtaining these warrants is, of course, a topic for discussion, but I think in order to tap, one of the FISA judges has to say "OK, go do it."

That said, the way the letter is worded, unless the Congressional metadata is somehow scrubbed and excluded from the meta-database--and we know it isn't, because the idea is that this metadata is just numbers, it's not about specific people, UNTIL the warrant is gotten--the answer to Bernie's question has to be YES. It can never be "NO" unless they shut the program down, or start "excluding" people--and "excluding" people is, IMO, worse than including everyone -- it smacks of "politburo and party apparatchiks privilege" and that won't do at all.

Response to ronnie624 (Reply #38)

Response to ronnie624 (Reply #38)

 

2banon

(7,321 posts)
49. Exactly at the heart of the issue..
Sat Jan 4, 2014, 01:27 PM
Jan 2014

it isn't the "meta data collection" by itself, as if it were all just disappearing into cyber space never to be seen again, as it were.

It's having the wherewithal to eavesdrop - for POLITICAL and other nefarious purposes, and being able to do this with no MEANINGFUL oversight scrutiny..

The apparatus of the FISA court and it's administrative systems is a complete joke, thanks to the Patriot Act(s) and the fascists who set those in place.

ronnie624

(5,764 posts)
60. Yes. 'Spying' is a diversion from the over-arching issue.
Sat Jan 4, 2014, 02:47 PM
Jan 2014

It is the collection and storage of personal data by the government into search-able dossiers on all US citizens, that is so offensive to the principles of democracy.

Mustellus

(328 posts)
17. When McConnell calls John Boehner, I'm sure they have nothing to hide....
Fri Jan 3, 2014, 07:36 PM
Jan 2014

... and don't mind President Obama listening in.

Just as Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid never complained about the Total Rove Awareness Program.

Meanwhile the NSA has already passed around sound captures of our troops deployed in combat zones 'sexting' with their loved ones at home... and enjoying every moment of it.

How long before they start selling credit card numbers and industrial intelligence to competing companies? There are endless entrepreneurial opportunities in being an NSA 'analyst'.

 

2banon

(7,321 posts)
19. Outstanding Bernie Sanders! Bravo! Another true American Hero and Patriot!
Fri Jan 3, 2014, 08:09 PM
Jan 2014

Another true American Hero and Patriot!

Wonder how long it will take for Alexander to respond, if ever. (not holding breath)

mitty14u2

(1,015 posts)
20. Video; NSA Surveillance in Europe - European Parliament Hearing on NSA Surveillance and EU Citizens
Fri Jan 3, 2014, 08:31 PM
Jan 2014

Journalist Glenn Greenwald testifies before a European Parliamentary Committee about National Security Agency surveillance practices, civil liberties of European citizens, and privacy concerns.

http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/316863-1

This is riveting with true concerns for all, reminding us all how the head of the FBI back in the day, J Edger Hoover had Scandalizing information on anyone they wanted and used it to control power. 1 hour, 3 minutes

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
22. Didn't Clapper lie to Congress, and wasn't that fine?
Fri Jan 3, 2014, 09:04 PM
Jan 2014

So why bother asking? He'll just get the least-untruthful answer or whatever nonsense they call it these days.

questionseverything

(9,655 posts)
24. maybe if he perjures himself repeatedly
Fri Jan 3, 2014, 10:08 PM
Jan 2014

justice will prosecute?

srry,just dreaming but following link has interesting debate between greenwald and some msm reporter about prosecuting clapper

ps read the comments too,ernest,brad's co writer is a lawyer

http://www.bradblog.com/?p=10442

SamKnause

(13,107 posts)
51. Greenwald
Sat Jan 4, 2014, 01:54 PM
Jan 2014

Thanks for posting this video.

Glenn Greenwald has the patience of a Saint; this coming from an Atheist.

What a smarmy tool Ruth Marcus is.

 

L0oniX

(31,493 posts)
57. This is America. Everyone lies. That's why they call it "The Great Satan".
Sat Jan 4, 2014, 02:34 PM
Jan 2014

Some where in the bible I read that Satan is the father of the lie. Go figure.

On the other hand I am having a real tough time thinking good about people.

erronis

(15,286 posts)
23. Can we politely ask for some lost emails (from the Bushies)?
Fri Jan 3, 2014, 09:11 PM
Jan 2014

I'd really like to recover some personal/political emails that were sent between the WH and the Ashcroftian Liberty University xian operatives that were somehow inadvertently destroyed.

Or the mittus Rmonius hard drives that were conveniently removed from the Massachusett's state-owned computers when Mr. mitt left office.

Best, would Mr. NSA please send us a copy of all correspondence amongst the participants of Dicky Chenny's Energy Task Force? Although, We, The American People, paid for these nice people to gather and dictate our futures, we haven't been able to locate any source material.

Bless you, NSA.
You might end up being the backup/archival/attic/basement storage that we all need.
Just let us get our shit back, please.

agentS

(1,325 posts)
32. Maybe yes, maybe no
Fri Jan 3, 2014, 11:35 PM
Jan 2014

I actually hope the NSA IS spying on Congress- someone's gotta keep an on those skeezy posers.
For example, some of them seemed more comfortable supporting the Israeli gov (Liebermann) than the US gov.

But let's be honest about 'blackmail'- most of the GOP has no shame anyway. What's the NSA gonna do, throw out pics of Boener drunk to the press? everybody knows he's a drunk anyway and his district keeps voting for him because they don't like black people!. How you gonna blackmail folks like that?

tclambert

(11,087 posts)
35. Sen. Sanders can hardly lift his phone from the weight of all the bugs crammed into it
Sat Jan 4, 2014, 01:58 AM
Jan 2014

one would imagine. And he might want to ask why his computer has so many more cables coming out of it than anyone else's.

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
36. ...like I could give a shit.
Sat Jan 4, 2014, 02:17 AM
Jan 2014

Bernie...you're a good guy BUT there are a lot more important things. AND it takes a FISA court order to LISTEN.

Douglas Carpenter

(20,226 posts)
37. exactly - there are a lot more important things than keeping America a liberal western democracy -
Sat Jan 4, 2014, 03:39 AM
Jan 2014

all these dingbats that care about human rights and our constitution are getting unnerving. Why shouldn't the NSA keep close tabs on Congress? How else can they weed out the troublemakers? We know that when government bodies and secret panels can make their decisions in secret completely free from prying eyes and the meddling of the public and their elected representatives - that is when government can act the best. Unaccountability is the secret to affective governance.

 

2banon

(7,321 posts)
50. You actually believe that NSA depends on the FISA Court permission for "Listening"?
Sat Jan 4, 2014, 01:31 PM
Jan 2014

I mean seriously. You actually believe that is the case?

 

wildbilln864

(13,382 posts)
46. of course they do!
Sat Jan 4, 2014, 12:40 PM
Jan 2014

whether they'll admit it. Not likely. The key phrase was "every one" which includes congress critters.

 

L0oniX

(31,493 posts)
53. You can bet that if we get a repuke POTUS the NSA will be spying on Dems...
Sat Jan 4, 2014, 02:20 PM
Jan 2014

and it won't be in plumber style. On the other hand it may be possible that they are looking for dirt on "anyone" that can be used to keep the NSA growing.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
58. Alexander will say something like "not to my knowledge", which pretty much
Sat Jan 4, 2014, 02:36 PM
Jan 2014

exempts him for all eternity unless someone comes along with evidence to the contrary. He's retiring soon. If they actually admitted anything, I'd be stunned.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Senator (Bernie Sanders) ...