OBAMA MOCKS FOX CORRESPONDENT WHO ASKS WHY HE WANTS HIGHER GAS PRICES
Source: Think Progress
OBAMA MOCKS FOX CORRESPONDENT WHO ASKS WHY HE WANTS HIGHER GAS PRICES |
Ed, just from a political perspective, do you think that the President of the United States going into re-election wants gas prices to go higher? Is there anybody here who thinks that makes a lot of sense? President Barack Obama asked at todays press conference, after Fox News correspondent Ed Henry accused him of supporting higher gas prices. Heres the bottom line with respect to gas prices. I want gas prices lower because they hurt families.
http://thinkprogress.org/green/2012/03/06/438997/obama-mocks-fox-correspondent-who-asks-why-he-wants-higher-gas-prices/
Read more: http://thinkprogress.org/green/2012/03/06/438997/obama-mocks-fox-correspondent-who-asks-why-he-wants-higher-gas-prices/
Thrill
(19,178 posts)without looking like a fool
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)Kahuna
(27,311 posts)hamsterjill
(15,223 posts)The simple fact that he works at Faux News makes him look like a fool. When he opens his mouth to ask a question...he merely confirms that he's a fool!
lukkadairish
(122 posts)Should have shot right back and asked him why FOX hates America....did he have to try really hard not to laugh his ass off in this guy's face?
rfranklin
(13,200 posts)They should be embarassed to be in the same room. (Then again maybe that's why they didn't laugh.)
elleng
(131,028 posts)ObaMania
(2,054 posts).. "some people might say" that Ed had a point.
I found no substance in the POTUS response. Same old song and dance.
whathehell
(29,069 posts)It's about time you schooled the morans!
Initech
(100,093 posts)whathehell
(29,069 posts)So maybe a little sass will help..
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)I LOVE that!!!!
Heeee heeeee! Haven't heard that in a long time; I forgot how much I love that saying. Never heard it followed by Mr. Prez, but I think I like it even better that way!
whathehell
(29,069 posts)Me too....I received a birthday card awhile ago
of dancing teenagers along with the words:
"Birthdays -- What a perfect time to get down with your bad self"!
Lint Head
(15,064 posts)Enrique
(27,461 posts)I don't see much mocking.
It's conceivable for people to want higher gas prices by the way, I've seen that idea expressed many times. But Obama is not one of those people and the way they try to paint him that way is ridiculous, like all attempts to paint him as an ideologue, which he's the furthest thing from.
Broderick
(4,578 posts)in so many words after elected. He felt it was too soon, and too quick to rise. I can kind of agree with him. Seems today, the higher gas prices are less effective in shutting people off and the hurt doesn't seem as bad in my opinion. When they spiked this high last time people were irate. News story after news story ran. I don't see that vitriol over it. I think people are more used to it. If the rise is progressive and slower it seems we adjust better. People still have no complaint paying five times as much for bottled water of their liking. It is amazing to me that in the sands, the middle of the desert, we can extract crude oil; Barrel it up; ship it to America and then refine it in a multitude of ways; deliver it to terminals, ship it to gas stations, and then pump that into vehicles - all less than bottled water. Amazing to me. The average fuel mileage of vehicles continues to increase and people are making more environmentally friendly purchases in the vehicles they drive. Little by little we are moving forward in America. Even the ethanol fuel tax that went away on January first was hardly noticed and I see no draw back in economic growth, albeit slowly getting better.
Enrique
(27,461 posts)I know Steven Chu said that back around the time Obama chose him, but I doubt Obama himself said it because we'd be seeing that quote all over the place, but we're not.
Broderick
(4,578 posts)Response to Broderick (Reply #15)
Broderick This message was self-deleted by its author.
SlimJimmy
(3,180 posts)Sen. OBAMA: Well, I think that we have been slow to move in a better direction when it comes to energy usage. And the president, frankly, hasnt had an energy policy. And as a consequence, weve been consuming energy as if its infinite. We now know that our demand is badly outstripping supply with China and India growing as rapidly as they are. So
HARWOOD: So could these high prices help us?
Sen. OBAMA: I think that I would have preferred a gradual adjustment. The fact that this is such a shock to American pocketbooks is not a good thing. But if we take some steps right now to help people make the adjustment, first of all by putting more money into their pockets, but also by encouraging the market to adapt to these new circumstances more quickly, particularly US automakers, then I think ultimately, we can come out of this stronger and have a more efficient energy policy than we do right now.
http://www.whitehousedossier.com/2012/02/23/2008-obama-high-gas-prices/
Broderick
(4,578 posts)FailureToCommunicate
(14,018 posts)I want to raise gas prices?"
Anyone else in this room ---with a brain?
thelordofhell
(4,569 posts)russspeakeasy
(6,539 posts)cats and dogs. and, I forgot ponies...
freshwest
(53,661 posts)TexasTowelie
(112,323 posts)Not only did he address the question from Ed Henry, but he was able to provide the statistical information about the impact of the policies that he has advocated. Take that Faux News!
liberal N proud
(60,339 posts)Nicely Done!
flamingdem
(39,314 posts)lol
n2doc
(47,953 posts)"No, I don't want higher oil prices. However my predecessors, Mr. Bush and his vice President Cheney, were oil men who oversaw the largest sustained increase in gas prices in US history. You might ask them what they think. "
KansDem
(28,498 posts)"I've got a palm tree in Wisconsin to sell you!"
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)What a douchebag. The president schools him every time he asks a dumb question. You'd think he would suffer shell shock by now.
RC
(25,592 posts)you will ask dumb questions.
xxqqqzme
(14,887 posts)came straight from his faux boss. Hope that answer gave tubby ailes heartburn.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)All that has to be done is that the House Republicans have to come out with a bill
declaring that gas will be priced no higher than $1.50/gal. Send it to the Senate
and then have the President sign it.
See how simple that is. I would bet the President would sign it.
Call Congress today and dare them to put their money where their mouth is.
The only problem with that is that it is hard to know where the republican
mouth is.
nykym
(3,063 posts)where the sun don't shine!
The Wizard
(12,546 posts)man parts.
RainDog
(28,784 posts)DocMac
(1,628 posts)I thought it had been established that fox is not really a news channel...that they are permitted to lie because of that very fact.
bamacrat
(3,867 posts)Gas is like a tax, and a regressive one at that.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)Why are they treated so differently? After all, one presents the news of the day in an entertaining, informative, truthful & accurate format.
The other has Sean Hannity.
Puzzler
(2,505 posts)TahitiNut
(71,611 posts)This, in a nutshell, is the Faux News "Book Of Style" in (what they pretend is) journalism. To understand how to ask a question, one must actually have some modicum of intellectual curiosity. Instead, they're Inquisitors. They have an agenda and pursue it with mindless obsession. Their slack-jawed audience merely 'tunes in' to put their Dali-esque fantasy world on life support. Imbeciles.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)you've been on hiatus, haven't you?
SG
TahitiNut
(71,611 posts)While I've kept up my 'membership' (i.e. star), I lurked and didn't post for quite a while. A couple of years. I'm not posting much even now.
The Wizard
(12,546 posts)asked a question that assumed the President wanted higher gas prices. Pox News has been pushing that angle.
I would ask the Pox Propagandist at what age did he first realize he enjoyed sticking an ice pick in his testicles for sexual gratification.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)especially when he turned Chipmunk Cheeks Henry to derision in front of his peers:
"Is there anybody here who thinks that makes a lot of sense?"
Well played, Mr. President, well played!
SleeplessinSoCal
(9,128 posts)Ishoutandscream2
(6,663 posts)Knocked it out of the park, and into the street. Honestly, how easy was that?
patrice
(47,992 posts)patrice
(47,992 posts)prices for.
Is it possible to get any dumber than F*x Ewes?
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)that this NEVER shows up of Faux News?
underpants
(182,851 posts)with their talking points that will do NOTHING to affect gas prices.
Oh and they will lead off with "THEN DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT!!!"
TheKentuckian
(25,029 posts)Skittles
(153,170 posts)very difficult, I would imagine
chrisa
(4,524 posts)Yes, Obama actually wants gas prices to go higher, wingnuts. Makes so much sense. Why? Because he's evil and mean. (sarcasm)
sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)ever complain about parasite speculators. In any essential commodity (just about everything) only those involved in the direct supply chain from producers to consumers should be permitted to hedge. Such investors have an interest in stable prices, outside speculators profit from driving prices up and down aka boom/bust economics. Such speculation contributes nothing of value to the economy, unless continuing to fatten too fat hogs that should have already gone to market and slaughter is considered value.
krispos42
(49,445 posts)That would put the federal chunk at 58.7 cents and the state chunk (on average) at 91.7 cents.
Maybe we'd finally have sufficient roads.
marble falls
(57,137 posts)is an even better communicator than Reagan ever was. Ed from FOX ended up slowpitching to the President who used the opportunity to pwn FOX and the GOP primary chumps with a home-run. I almost believe it was a setup or the reporter was in on it.
Devil_Fish
(1,664 posts)Export of gas has also increased as consumer demand has decreased, and prices are still high (almost at $5 per gal. here) What is the point of increasing production, and reducing consumption if the excess is being exported therefore keeping gas prices high?
I don't give a shit if it is an election year or not, the situation is bull shit.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)It's about the speculators who raise the price, while taking delivery of none of said commodity.
fhrtjtr
(12 posts)Flatpicker
(894 posts)Things I have heard in the last 24 hrs. (Can't say all year, because 2012 is turning out to be real Derpfest.)
Can't the WH vet the press for working braincells?
Bigmack
(8,020 posts)... what about nationalizing the remaining oil underground in the US..? What about nationalizing the refineries? Mr. President, since fuel prices could kill the recovery and further damage the middle/working class, why isn't the control of our oil/coal/natural gas/gasoline a National Security matter?"
cascadiance
(19,537 posts)... and why do you continue to fuel projection of their faults on to himself and the Democrats?
Tell them that if they stopped this infatuation with the Keystone oil pipeline, which will likely only raise gasoline prices by having most of that gas being exported, and the Republicans standing in the way of putting in place a transaction tax on Wall Street transactions which would help stop speculation which IS the reason why gasoline prices are higher now, then perhaps we could have lower gasoline prices that Obama, the Democrats and most Americans want, but which corporatist entities like Fox News and the Republicans don't. In short sir... SUCK ON IT JERK and ask yourself that question instead!
But I guess Obama is more of a diplomat than I and would hold back from that way of putting that bozo in his place the way the rest of us might!
txlibdem
(6,183 posts)Democrats in congress don't even mention the word "Republican" when talking about the disaster in the economy, any of the previous disastrous gas price hikes, the housing bubble (and burst), banks tanking the economy because Republican overseers were too busy with cocaine and hooker parties paid for by the very same fossil fuels companies they were supposed to be regulating.
They say "my friends on the other side of the aisle" and other spineless phrases like that.
If Democrats in congress do not grow a spine and become intelligently forceful and take a stand then the idiot Republicans will always win --as they have been for 20 years now-- when it comes to policy and enforcing the law.
Congressional Democrats seem to be afraid of confrontation, the Repukes bread and butter, their only strategy. So if they all don't want to go down like Kucinich (whom I liked), they better start growing a spine like Nancy Pelosi has done of late.
I say "Progressive, driven and passionate Democrats only" in the Democratic primaries coming up. We can win back our economy and our government if WE THE PEOPLE stop electing spineless, gutless wimps to be our "leaders" in congress.
JennyCait
(11 posts)sofa king
(10,857 posts)When the President answered the question more cogently than any Republican imagined, Gingrich simply lied about what the President said.
Liberalynn
(7,549 posts)mmonk
(52,589 posts)The things people are willing to believe today is both humorous and sad.
dmr
(28,349 posts)I watched it yesterday, I thought Henry was from CNN. I don't watch either Fox or CNN, so I don't know who's who.
Spazito
(50,408 posts)said this regarding how he approaches press conferences with the President:
"I was heading into this event with the same strategy: make news on something unexpected (I won't tell you which topics I was working on cause it would ruin the surprise for a future presser or interview with the president)."
http://articles.cnn.com/2009-03-25/politics/henry.obama_1_aig-president-obama-question?_s=PM OLITICS
He obviously missed ALL the classes on what a journalist's job is. It's NOT to "make news on something unexpected", it's to REPORT the news.
He is such an inept creep, fits perfectly with Fox.
Brigid
(17,621 posts)That Obama is just getting sick and tired of the sheer stupidity of the RW nutters? Since he has been gifted with far more patience than most of us, it took a while. Or maybe it just took him this long to figure out that they really are that stupid.