Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Redfairen

(1,276 posts)
Mon Jan 13, 2014, 12:20 AM Jan 2014

Suit: Lake Tahoe fireworks violate Clean Water Act

Source: Associated Press

A federal lawsuit accusing the Lake Tahoe Visitors Authority of polluting the alpine lake with debris from Fourth of July and Labor Day fireworks says the tourism agency and its contractor should be subject to up to $75 million in fines.

Joseph and Joan Truxler of Zephyr Cove, Nev., on the lake's southeast shore, insist their suit is not intended to halt the spectacular, boat-launched displays that have wowed tens of thousands of visitors for three decades.

.......

Both are accused of discharging trash, debris, munitions and chemical residues — including perchlorate, nitrate and sulfur — into the lake twice a year for at least the last five years.

The lawsuit says that they failed to obtain the necessary discharge permit in violation of the federal act and are violating California and Nevada state water quality standards strictly prohibiting debris on the lake, which is famous for its clear waters.



Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/suit-lake-tahoe-fireworks-violate-clean-water-act-182842549.html?.tsrc=attmp

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Oscarmonster13

(209 posts)
1. oh wow
Mon Jan 13, 2014, 12:29 AM
Jan 2014

talk about a tempest! LTVA is backed by CASINO/gaming interests anfd they have LOTS of money to throw at this.

I have often worried/wondered about the debris in the lake after the show...and now they have added one on Labor Day and New Years... it's just greed to get the visitors to come to the lake, because the economy is so suckish here. If you drive from stateline to the california side of town it's a few miles, I can't tell you how many commercial spaces are vacant, and have been since 2007 or so..
It's the gamine interests in Nevada that can afford to dump more money into the empty spaces, but they only do it in Nevada.

anyway, this will be a fun one to watch in the local news, I am sure our City Council will get all upset and take sides too...

 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
2. K&R
Mon Jan 13, 2014, 12:32 AM
Jan 2014
- Americans love their shiny objects, and all things that go boom!




"We've got the only national anthem that mentions fucking rockets and bombs in the damn thing!" ~George Carlin
 

Hell Hath No Fury

(16,327 posts)
3. This is not going --
Mon Jan 13, 2014, 12:33 AM
Jan 2014

to go over well locally. Tahoe is almost solely dependent on tourists, and the 4th & the fireworks display is one of the events the economy depends on. Tahoe has been struggling mightily from lack of snow, massive numbers of foreclosures, and tribal gaming. The loss of the fireworks will be a huge blow.

JI7

(89,276 posts)
6. how about just seeing the natural environment ?
Mon Jan 13, 2014, 01:41 AM
Jan 2014

i don't see how or why it has to compete with gaming as i see it as 2 different things people enjoy.

 

Hell Hath No Fury

(16,327 posts)
13. The fireworks are primarily for families -
Mon Jan 13, 2014, 02:20 PM
Jan 2014

Tahoe has always been about specific target audiences like skiers, hikers, families and, until recently, gamblers -- the town cannot survive on one or two sectors, Visitors come from hundreds of miles around for the 4th celebration and New Years. At a time when the local economy is in free-fall, the loss of the fireworks shows could be devastating. I hope they can develop a solution that addresses the environment AND the local economy.

ManiacJoe

(10,136 posts)
4. Don't we have the technology to clean up the lake
Mon Jan 13, 2014, 01:18 AM
Jan 2014

of the trash and debris, which could be used after each fireworks show?

Cleaning up the chemicals would be another story...

Jesus Malverde

(10,274 posts)
5. One of the best shows I've seen...
Mon Jan 13, 2014, 01:30 AM
Jan 2014

I kinda understand the point, since they are shot up over the lake. Too bad.

mopinko

(70,263 posts)
7. now that we seem to have fireworks for everything, i was just waiting for this.
Mon Jan 13, 2014, 02:23 AM
Jan 2014

they shoot them every week here in chicago, out over lake michigan. i have been bothered by this even tho i like a good fireworks show as much as the next guy.
but i keep thinking- the chrome, and other metals used for colors are not good, and not going anywhere.

tomm2thumbs

(13,297 posts)
8. Yup -- some traditions could be kicked back a step or two from being used so often
Mon Jan 13, 2014, 06:03 AM
Jan 2014

Even Disney ended up using an air-powered launching device to send shells into the air over their parks as much of the discharge of pollution is that which is used to launch the shells up into the air. (at least 15 years now) I don't see why they can't require this kind of system EVERYWHERE fireworks are used in the air for shows. It just goes without saying that if it can work for a place like Disneyland, it can certainly be show to be a proven system that can be retrofittted elsewhere when repeated skyline shows are presented.

People just don't want to spend the money -- they'd rather pollute than care for the most part. Maybe the lawsuit will force some changes to be made along the lines of limiting the pollution vs. outright preventing it. I'm all for incremental progress.

article on disney issues:
http://articles.latimes.com/2010/jul/03/local/la-me-anaheim-fireworks-20100704


titaniumsalute

(4,742 posts)
9. I shoot professional fireworks
Mon Jan 13, 2014, 09:21 AM
Jan 2014

The system that Disney uses is:

A. EXTREMELY expensive. When they built the system they realized, however, that they can pay for it over a series of years since they do nightly shows. No fireworks company does nightly shows therefore an expensive system like this is not feasible.

B. I've toured the Disney pyrotechnic launching system. Their air tanks and rigging are massive. It is not a system that you can through onto a flatbed and drive around to shoot fireworks at random locations. It is a static system and cannot be moved.

As someone in the fireworks industry I can understand the delicate nature of the performing especially in more protected natural areas. I'm sensitive to that. But then I also look at the economic impact that fireworks have in most cases and it is HUGE. I saw someone post in this thread "Well people should just go to see the nature..." Well, that would be nice. But that isn't the world we live in. A friend of mine recently was very angry that the baseball game he attended had so many promotions, skits, funny bits, etc. during the game. He asked "Doesn't anyone just come to watch the damned game?" The answer is no.

I drive past the Ft. Lauderdale Airport everyday and think about the amount of jet fuel being burnt by every plane and then think about what one of our 10 minute fireworks cost the environment. The fireworks is probably just a drop in the bucket compared to so many other areas that are not good for our environment.

tomm2thumbs

(13,297 posts)
14. Guess I'm not one of those people who see 'can't' and 'won't' as options -- money is the bottom line
Mon Jan 13, 2014, 05:43 PM
Jan 2014

My point is people should look into minimizing impact -- maybe they can take 15% out of the air by kicking up only the large shells with a system other-than-pyro.... maybe it is only a 10-unit transportable firing mechanism that automatically reloads multple shots. But it's something.

Someone could make some good money designing something that could be taken on the road. Maybe you can do it. You sound like you love what you do.

titaniumsalute

(4,742 posts)
15. Thank you. Yes my team is pretty innovative
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 11:54 PM
Jan 2014

One thing also...the black powder that is used to "launch" a shell is much less bad for the environment then what the colors are in the actual shells. The perchlorates (actually very low levels for US fireworks compared to many others made around the world) are in the colors, not the launching powders.

A bunch of guys getting together to reenact a Civil War battle with muskets and cannons would fire a LOT more black powder than we would during a large show.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
11. why don't they sue the real estate developers and the cattle grazers aswell?
Mon Jan 13, 2014, 01:25 PM
Jan 2014

Until recently, construction on the banks of the Lake had been largely under the control of real estate developers. Construction activities have resulted in a clouding of the lake's blue waters. Currently, the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency is regulating construction along the shoreline.[50] (and has won two Federal Supreme Court battles over recent decisions). These regulations are unpopular with many residents, especially those in the Tahoe Lakefront Homeowners Association

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Tahoe#Environmental_issues

 

Hell Hath No Fury

(16,327 posts)
12. There are no more cattle in the valley -
Mon Jan 13, 2014, 02:08 PM
Jan 2014

The remaining ranches no longer have any sort of livestock. There are a couple of horse barns where you can go riding, but nothing like the old days.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Suit: Lake Tahoe firework...