Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Redfairen

(1,276 posts)
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 09:08 PM Feb 2014

Only four of 20 subpoenaed in Christie bridge investigation comply by deadline

Source: NBC News

Only four Port Authority officials met this week's deadline to turn over all documents subpoenaed in the New Jersey Legislature's investigation into the George Washington Bridge lane closures, according to a list provided to NBC News.

Fourteen others who were subpoenaed-- including officials in Gov. Chris Christie's  office, members of his campaign committee, his press secretary and other top aides-- have either been granted extensions or have begun turning over material "on a rolling basis," according to a source close to the investigation.

Two of those subpoenaed -- former Deputy Chief of Staff Bridget Kelly and former campaign manager Bill Stepien -- have invoked their Fifth Amendment right against self incrimination and declined to turn over any material.

The list of those who have yet to fully comply with the subpoenas includes David Sampson, Christies' close political ally who chairs the Port Authority; Charles McKenna, Christie's former chief counsel; Kevin O'Dowd, Christie's former chief of staff and nominee to be attorney general; Reginia Egea, Christie's incoming chief of staff; and Nicole Davidman Drewniak, a Christie fundraiser and wife of Christie press secretary Michael Drewniak.


Read more: http://investigations.nbcnews.com/_news/2014/02/04/22572717-only-four-of-20-subpoenaed-in-christie-bridge-investigation-comply-by-deadline?lite

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Only four of 20 subpoenaed in Christie bridge investigation comply by deadline (Original Post) Redfairen Feb 2014 OP
Only four?! Wow. I smell a rat. tofuandbeer Feb 2014 #1
Arrest them, shackle them, through them in a cell... DRoseDARs Feb 2014 #2
Massive obstruction of justice, and a clear conspiracy to do so. another_liberal Feb 2014 #3
Just to be fair it should be noted that these people have been granted temporary extensions Bjorn Against Feb 2014 #4
Something I Don't Understand Is This New Use Of The 5th Amendment DallasNE Feb 2014 #5
They will get away with ALL OF IT! chuckstevens Feb 2014 #6
Prison suits and handcuffs SoapBox Feb 2014 #7
remember kkkarl rove? didnt he ignore one? leftyohiolib Feb 2014 #8
Rules, and the law, are for dumb schmucks, apparently. blkmusclmachine Feb 2014 #9
Of Course, of Darrell Issa had served the subpoena... TomCADem Feb 2014 #10
 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
3. Massive obstruction of justice, and a clear conspiracy to do so.
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 09:22 PM
Feb 2014

State and Federal criminal charges are no doubt on the way.

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)
4. Just to be fair it should be noted that these people have been granted temporary extensions
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 09:36 PM
Feb 2014

They are not in contempt yet as the investigators have agreed to give them more time, however I suspect some of them may be facing contempt charges in the future.

Kelly and Stepien will not be able to get away with pleading the fifth, if they don't release the documents by the time the extension ends they will be charged with contempt. Wildstein got a contempt charge against him for taking the fifth during testimony, but he actually has a much stronger case for pleading the fifth than either Kelly or Stepien do because while he did not testify he did release all the documents that were requested of him including a few that were smoking guns against him. If Wildstein got a contempt charge then Kelly and Stepien will almost certainly receive contempt charges as well if they don't turn over the documents.

DallasNE

(7,403 posts)
5. Something I Don't Understand Is This New Use Of The 5th Amendment
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 10:22 PM
Feb 2014

The traditional use is to keep somebody from being forced to testify under oath against themselves and that is wholly proper. What they are doing here is the equivalent of denying a search warrant for items that could incriminate. Granted, a search warrant is issued by a Judge based on a criminal investigation and a subpoena does not have a Judge's signature but it is still in regard to the gathering evidence for possible criminal activity.

Keep in mind that what they turn over is reviewed by their own attorney who determines whether it is pertinent to the subpoena and when not that data is redacted.

Because this is a new use there is probably no court ruling so I'm guessing it is just a stall tactic to tie things up in the Court system, possibly stalling things out past 2016. Amazing what high-priced attorney's can pull off.

 

chuckstevens

(1,201 posts)
6. They will get away with ALL OF IT!
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 10:55 PM
Feb 2014

Seriously, Republicans always get away with this type of shit. George Bush and Dick Cheney should have been impeached and sent to the Hague as war criminals. What happened? NOTHING! Karl Rove helped blow the cover of a covert CIA agent. What did tough Patrick Fitzgerald do? NOTHING! Republicans have been caught red handed stealing elections by having two polling station in inter cities like Cleveland, while they just happen to have dozens of polling stations in suburban Republicans areas. They have been caught throwing out Democratic registration forms and NOTHING EVER HAPPENS! Currently the GOP has websites that look like one is donating to Democrats for Congress, when in reality people are unknowingly donating to Republicans. What will happen? NOTHING!

If all these people got away with the above actions, why does anyone think timid Democrats or Eric Holder's wimpy Justice Department will do anything that will result in real punishment for the bully Chris Christie?

Even if they try, Faux News will scream so much that idiots will start to look at Christie as the victim. Have a nice day!



TomCADem

(17,390 posts)
10. Of Course, of Darrell Issa had served the subpoena...
Wed Feb 5, 2014, 01:04 AM
Feb 2014

...and President Obama had not met his deadline, the corporate media would be in full impeachment mode.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Only four of 20 subpoenae...