Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
Sat Feb 22, 2014, 01:28 PM Feb 2014

Telecom Giants Paid Millions To 'Honor' Minority Lawmakers Before The Merger

Source: Huffington Post

WASHINGTON -- Comcast and Time Warner Cable are heading into the lobbying stage of their proposed merger with a strong hand. They boast large teams of lobbyists, a history of massive campaign contributions to members of both political parties and close ties to the White House.

Over the last several years, the two telecom giants have also contributed millions of dollars to "honor" members of Congress and congressional caucuses. The biggest recipients of this money have been nonprofits linked to minority lawmakers, traditionally some of the most progressive members of Congress.

Disclosure of so-called honorary contributions -- ostensibly philanthropic gifts that go to organizations tied to congressional lawmakers or events designed to honor politicians -- became mandatory starting in 2008. In the years since, Comcast and Time Warner Cable have directed more than $3.7 million to celebrate lawmakers. Nonprofits affiliated with the Congressional Black Caucus, the Congressional Hispanic Caucus and the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus have benefited the most.

Now Congress is jumping into the debate over the planned Comcast-Time Warner Cable merger. The Senate Commerce Committee and both Antitrust Subcommittees have said they'll hold hearings. Public interest watchdogs worry that lawmakers' oversight could be influenced by all the past largesse.

Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/02/22/comcast-time-warner-cable-congress_n_4826665.html

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

L0oniX

(31,493 posts)
2. ...and the extra money that goes to pay for those lobbyists come out of your monthly payment.
Sat Feb 22, 2014, 02:21 PM
Feb 2014

Seems that they have more than enough money already.

 

L0oniX

(31,493 posts)
7. That is an NSA spy bug that's been implanted in your monitor. You can only see it when...
Sat Feb 22, 2014, 04:02 PM
Feb 2014

you view my posts ...because they are also tracking and recording me and what I type. Hope you feel safer now.

PSPS

(13,600 posts)
4. Which accounting form contains the line for "bribes paid for favorable legislation?"
Sat Feb 22, 2014, 02:37 PM
Feb 2014

And when will the corporate/state media stop using the term "lobbyist" for influence peddler and "campaign contribution" for bribe? I suppose that will only happen when "enhanced interrogation" is dropped for torture.

dembotoz

(16,808 posts)
5. i am in the business and when the fight for time warner was between comcast and charter
Sat Feb 22, 2014, 02:58 PM
Feb 2014

there was this article that said one of the very big things in favor of comcast was that comcast
had a much bigger lobby arm.

that should not matter but i guess it is more important than better service

daybranch

(1,309 posts)
8. MSNBC gagged!
Sat Feb 22, 2014, 08:35 PM
Feb 2014

It looks to me like one of the worst effects of monopoly is already visible. Lets fight this merger.

okaawhatever

(9,462 posts)
9. There is something suspicious about this article. They don't discuss Comcast's outrageous lobbying
Sat Feb 22, 2014, 09:53 PM
Feb 2014

expenses, dollars to super PACs, donations to candidates or money to organizations like ALEC to help them make even more money but the fact that Comcast gives money to Congressional Black Caucus and Hispanic Caucus' non-profit foundations is at issue?
The article doesn't separate how much is given to the various congressional Caucus non-profits Foundations, but it combines all the caucus foundations and other non-profits for a total of $3.7 million over six years. Why don't they mention how much of that went to Republican foundations and non-profits?

During the same time frame Comcast alone spent about $91,000,000 lobbying Congress and $15 million in disclosed political donations;. Of those donations approx 60% went to Democrats and 40% went to Republicans. Source: OpenSecrets.org

But Huffington Post ignores all of that because these lawmakers are going to be swayed by $3 million to all their Caucus foundations, scholarship funds and non-profits over six years?

Give me a friggin' break!!!

Total friggin' hit piece. There is a lot wrong with Comcast, there's a lot wrong with a merger, and there's a lot wrong with money in politics but I'm pretty sure what this moron is reporting on isn't what is going to push the legislators over the edge.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Telecom Giants Paid Milli...