Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,675 posts)
Mon Mar 10, 2014, 07:07 PM Mar 2014

General's court-martial is thrown into jeopardy

Source: AP-Excite

By MICHAEL BIESECKER

FORT BRAGG, N.C. (AP) - The sexual assault case against an Army general was thrown into jeopardy Monday when the judge said the military may have improperly pressed ahead with a trial to send a message about its determination to curb rape and other widespread misconduct.

Judge Col. James Pohl refused to dismiss the charges against Brig. Gen. Jeffrey A. Sinclair but offered the defense another chance to plea-bargain the case down with a different set of military officials.

The twist comes with the Pentagon under heavy pressure from Congress and beyond to combat what the military says is an epidemic of rape and other sex crimes. On Monday, in fact, the Senate was expected to approve legislation cracking down on misconduct.

Pohl reviewed newly disclosed emails in Sinclair's case and said he found evidence of unlawful command influence in Fort Bragg officials' decision to reject a plea deal before the trial began late last week.

FULL story at link.


Read more: http://apnews.excite.com/article/20140310/DACF2HO01.html





In this March 4, 2014, file photo, Brig. Gen. Jeffrey Sinclair, right, leaves the courthouse with his lawyers Richard Scheff, left, and Ellen C. Brotman, not pictured, following a day of motions at Fort Bragg, N.C. A military judge declined Monday, March 10, 2014, to dismiss sexual assault charges against Sinclair after reviewing what he said was evidence that political considerations influenced the military's handling of the case. (AP Photo/The Fayetteville Observer, James Robinson, File)

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
General's court-martial is thrown into jeopardy (Original Post) Omaha Steve Mar 2014 OP
The corruption is complete. n/t DeSwiss Mar 2014 #1
General's sex charge trial halted as plea negotiations ensue Eugene Mar 2014 #2
Wow...you have GOT to be kidding... Blue_Tires Mar 2014 #3

Eugene

(61,919 posts)
2. General's sex charge trial halted as plea negotiations ensue
Tue Mar 11, 2014, 01:34 PM
Mar 2014

Source: Los Angeles Times

General's sex charge trial halted as plea negotiations ensue

By David Zucchino
March 11, 2014, 9:09 a.m.

FT. BRAGG, N.C. -- The sexual assault case against Army Brig. Gen. Jeffrey Sinclair was suspended indefinitely Tuesday as the general’s lawyers began negotiating a possible plea deal with Army prosecutors.

The abrupt halt came after a military judge, in an extraordinary ruling, declared Monday that he found evidence of improper political interference by the Army in the highly publicized case. He gave Sinclair’s lawyers an opportunity to seek a plea agreement even though testimony in the case began last week.

The judge, Army Col. James L. Pohl, told a jury panel of five male two-star generals Tuesday that he did not know how long the court-martial might be suspended. Sinclair’s lead attorney, Richard L. Scheff, said he expected the delay to last several weeks as the two sides negotiate.

If a plea agreement is reached, a new military commander with no previous ties to the case would decide whether to approve the deal. Under military law, a senior commander -- called a "convening authority" -- decides whether to bring sexual assault charges and approves plea deals.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]


Read more: http://www.latimes.com/nation/nationnow/la-na-nn-sinclair-sex-charges-20140311,0,5198138.story
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»General's court-martial i...