Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jsr

(7,712 posts)
Tue Mar 11, 2014, 11:02 AM Mar 2014

Feinstein: CIA searched Senate panel's computers

Source: CNN

(CNN) -- The chairwoman of the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee accused the Central Intelligence Agency on Tuesday of inappropriately searching the committee's computers as the panel investigated the CIA's detention and interrogation program

Speaking on the Senate floor, Sen. Dianne Feinstein said CIA Director John Brennan told her in January that agency personnel searched the computers because of a belief that the panel might have had access to an internal review of the matter.

"The CIA did not ask the committee or its staff if the committee had access to the internal review or how we obtained it. Instead, the CIA just went and searched the committee's computer," she said. "... I have grave concerns that the CIA search may have ... violated the separation of powers principles embodied in the United States Constitution."

Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/11/politics/senate-cia/

37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Feinstein: CIA searched Senate panel's computers (Original Post) jsr Mar 2014 OP
of course they did. Voice for Peace Mar 2014 #1
Feinstien didn't care when it was "Other People" being spied on FreakinDJ Mar 2014 #24
She's old and tired warrant46 Mar 2014 #29
No - she is just a sell out FreakinDJ Mar 2014 #32
+1 warrant46 Mar 2014 #35
Wrong answer - happened on President Obama's watch. And since no VP supervises anybody 24601 Mar 2014 #25
ok.. I won't blame anybody Voice for Peace Mar 2014 #26
Have at it & Blame Away. Just aim your blame accurately. n/t 24601 Mar 2014 #30
it's my kneejerk response to blame Cheney for just about every sinister wrong Voice for Peace Mar 2014 #33
KGB - CIA? What differences are left? ChairmanAgnostic Mar 2014 #2
The Lady doth protest too much, Methinks. PeoViejo Mar 2014 #3
ironic, isn't it? This is what people ChairmanAgnostic Mar 2014 #7
+1 LittleGirl Mar 2014 #8
She probably gave them her password! n/t Buenaventura Mar 2014 #20
+1! n/t Catherina Mar 2014 #27
Huh, pisses her off when it happens to her, eh? AtheistCrusader Mar 2014 #4
That sucks doesn't it. Autumn Mar 2014 #5
What do you have to hide??? blah blah blah L0oniX Mar 2014 #6
So Senator Feinstein, if as you say, A Simple Game Mar 2014 #9
Revenge is a dish best served cold. MicaelS Mar 2014 #10
If you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear Senator. zeemike Mar 2014 #11
Well, at least now we know where the 4th amendment still applies arcane1 Mar 2014 #12
America is a representative democracy. Lawmakers ARE us in classified security matters. blm Mar 2014 #13
pffft antiquie Mar 2014 #14
it's only bad when it happens to her. nt Javaman Mar 2014 #15
Oh boohoo. MyNameGoesHere Mar 2014 #16
Doctor Frankenstein, your monster. Kelvin Mace Mar 2014 #17
nice tomm2thumbs Mar 2014 #21
I'm sure they have a FISA court order. blackspade Mar 2014 #18
what's ok for the peasnatry is not so for the royalty . fudifi leftyohiolib Mar 2014 #19
Transcript of Feinstein's floor remarks struggle4progress Mar 2014 #22
Posts, so far in this thread, suggest posters have not bothered to read or watch Feinstein's remarks struggle4progress Mar 2014 #23
So when will Obama clean house? ForgoTheConsequence Mar 2014 #36
I urge folk to read Feinstein's remarks carefully struggle4progress Mar 2014 #37
Oh now she has "grave concerns" lol! n/t Catherina Mar 2014 #28
Well, duh... pacalo Mar 2014 #31
I wonder if she gets it now. Fearless Mar 2014 #34
 

FreakinDJ

(17,644 posts)
24. Feinstien didn't care when it was "Other People" being spied on
Tue Mar 11, 2014, 04:53 PM
Mar 2014

But OMG - since she is on the Senate Intelligence Committee and it was her computer being searched "Now we she the Outrage"

What a piece of work

And we have seen her defend the CIA and Bush torture policies countless times

warrant46

(2,205 posts)
29. She's old and tired
Tue Mar 11, 2014, 07:36 PM
Mar 2014

At the age of 80, Feinstein is the oldest currently serving United States Senator.

She is truly a member of the 1% In 1980, Feinstein married Richard C. Blum, an investment banker. In 2003, Feinstein was ranked the fifth-wealthiest senator, with an estimated net worth of $26 million. By 2005 her net worth had increased to between $43 million and $99 million.Her 347-page financial-disclosure statement – characterized by the San Francisco Chronicle as "nearly the size of a phone book" – draws clear lines between her assets and those of her husband, with many of her assets in blind trusts.

The party needed a younger more progressive voice in CA. Sadly that did not happen in 2012

24601

(3,962 posts)
25. Wrong answer - happened on President Obama's watch. And since no VP supervises anybody
Tue Mar 11, 2014, 05:57 PM
Mar 2014

other than personal staff, you shouldn't blame VP Biden only.

 

Voice for Peace

(13,141 posts)
26. ok.. I won't blame anybody
Tue Mar 11, 2014, 06:53 PM
Mar 2014

bad habit to blame anyone for anything
when I don't even know what I'm talking about.
trying to quit.

 

Voice for Peace

(13,141 posts)
33. it's my kneejerk response to blame Cheney for just about every sinister wrong
Wed Mar 12, 2014, 01:08 AM
Mar 2014

and the Kochs for every environmental mess.

 

PeoViejo

(2,178 posts)
3. The Lady doth protest too much, Methinks.
Tue Mar 11, 2014, 11:08 AM
Mar 2014

You helped to create this Monster, Ms. Feinstein. Deal with it.

ChairmanAgnostic

(28,017 posts)
7. ironic, isn't it? This is what people
Tue Mar 11, 2014, 11:29 AM
Mar 2014

warned against, and she told us to fuck off, it would never happen.

LittleGirl

(8,287 posts)
8. +1
Tue Mar 11, 2014, 11:33 AM
Mar 2014

I know! Duh. You gave them the POWER !!! Why did you not ever think that that POWER would be abused, eventually! Duh!


edit: grammar for clarity.

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
9. So Senator Feinstein, if as you say,
Tue Mar 11, 2014, 11:34 AM
Mar 2014

"... I have grave concerns that the CIA search may have ... violated the separation of powers principles embodied in the United States Constitution." then perhaps you should have Mr. Brennan charged and let the third branch of the government decide.

While you are at it, see what you can do about that Clapper guy.

MicaelS

(8,747 posts)
10. Revenge is a dish best served cold.
Tue Mar 11, 2014, 11:42 AM
Mar 2014

How do like that plate now that YOU are eating it, Senator? Eat it ALL up, every damn bite.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
12. Well, at least now we know where the 4th amendment still applies
Tue Mar 11, 2014, 11:53 AM
Mar 2014

It apparently applies to only 100 people

blm

(113,065 posts)
13. America is a representative democracy. Lawmakers ARE us in classified security matters.
Tue Mar 11, 2014, 11:53 AM
Mar 2014

There is a large network within the CIA that doesn't report to the Oval Office, Senate or Congress. They are the operational core of BushInc. No Democratic president will ever accrue the power that would be needed to break it.

It's been that way since the late 70s.

 

antiquie

(4,299 posts)
14. pffft
Tue Mar 11, 2014, 11:58 AM
Mar 2014
The Fisa Improvements Act, promoted by Dianne Feinstein, the California Democrat who chairs the Senate intelligence committee, would both make permanent a loophole permitting the NSA to search for Americans’ identifying information without a warrant – and, civil libertarians fear, contains an ambiguity that might allow the FBI, the DEA and other law enforcement agencies to do the same thing.

“For the first time, the statute would explicitly allow the government to proactively search through the NSA data troves of information without a warrant,” said Michelle Richardson, the surveillance lobbyist for the ACLU.

“It may also expand current practices by allowing law enforcement to directly access US person information that was nominally collected for foreign intelligence purposes. This fourth amendment back door needs to be closed, not written into stone.”
 

MyNameGoesHere

(7,638 posts)
16. Oh boohoo.
Tue Mar 11, 2014, 12:13 PM
Mar 2014

You think you are more special than the people you supposedly represent? I guess for real outrage we will have to wait until the spying on AIPAC comes out.

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
18. I'm sure they have a FISA court order.
Tue Mar 11, 2014, 12:58 PM
Mar 2014

Because all of these programs are legal....well, because the secret people say it is.

struggle4progress

(118,295 posts)
23. Posts, so far in this thread, suggest posters have not bothered to read or watch Feinstein's remarks
Tue Mar 11, 2014, 03:33 PM
Mar 2014

which IMO are actually rather informative on the topic of the ongoing CIA torture coverup

pacalo

(24,721 posts)
31. Well, duh...
Tue Mar 11, 2014, 09:54 PM
Mar 2014


Can you hear us now, Sen. Feinstein? Or just when it affects you & your colleagues?
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Feinstein: CIA searched S...