Sandusky's wife: Victims manipulated over money
Source: AP
STATE COLLEGE, Pa. (AP) The wife of former Penn State assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky says she "definitely" believes her husband is innocent despite being convicted of sexually abusing 10 boys and that the victims' financial gain was at play.
Dottie Sandusky said in an interview broadcast Wednesday on NBC's "Today" show that "there was nothing that went on because I was here" in the couple's small home in State College, where some of the victims reported being abused in the basement.
Although one accuser said his muffled screams went unheard by her upstairs, Sandusky heard nothing "because he didn't scream," she said after giving interviewer Matt Lauer a tour of the house. "It's not a dungeon," she noted of the basement.
...
"I think it was, they were manipulated, and they saw money," she said. "Once lawyers came into the case, they said there was money."
Read more: http://bigstory.ap.org/article/sanduskys-wife-says-she-believes-hes-innocent
Edit to remove NBC link.
Harrisburg Patriot-News: Post-conviction life has its trials for the Sanduskys, Dottie tells "Today"
Centre Daily Times: I definitely believe him, Dottie Sandusky says of her husband
Yeah, a bunch of young men definitely would slander an innocent man for millions. That is definitely realistic huh? Why isn't this woman charged with obstruction of justice?
As for Paterno, while the lead Sandusky prosecutor has said there's no evidence Joe Paterno actively covered up for Sandusky, Louis Freeh's investigation says otherwise.
Botany
(70,567 posts)... he did that after Joe Paterno had been told about Sandusky's actions.
Seedersandleechers
(3,044 posts)YOU were manipulated and casted a blind eye to the abuse so you could live your "pretend" life. Fuck You.
Scairp
(2,749 posts)She knew and knows it's all true. Or, she's just a dumb bitch. Either way, I don't care if she is suffering. It pales in comparison to what those boys went through and will go through for the rest of their lives.
aikoaiko
(34,183 posts)Mail Message
On Wed Mar 12, 2014, 12:07 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
Here here
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=752903
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
"she's just a dumb bitch"? Sorry but this kind of talk belongs on MRA sites or Free Republic, even if talking about someone as cold hearted as Jerry Sandusky's in-denial wife.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed Mar 12, 2014, 12:18 PM, and the Jury voted 3-3 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I'm fine with the post.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Blatant.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Inappropriate pejorative
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Sometimes it worth using that phrase for someone like that. I understand why some people don't like us to use that phrase and mostly I agree. But not with this post.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
alp227
(32,047 posts)Can't even hide a message for such blatant misogyny? Are freeper mods infiltrating our juries?
Scairp
(2,749 posts)I'm a woman. Does that mean I can't call another woman a bitch, a public person who is offensive in every sense of the word, as some persons of color use a certain word with each another and defend it as acceptable, but only by them? Why is this any different? I argue no. And I promise this is not blatant misogyny. You don't have a clue as I've experienced it first hand so I know what it is not, and what it IS.
alp227
(32,047 posts)Sure, black rappers may use "n****" in songs, but DU is higher than that. I don't see the N-word being thrown around on our forum even with the "my own group" defense.
Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)That's the difference.
Just curious, but what makes her a "bitch" other than just being a woman? If it's based on her actions or words, what would you call a man with the same traits, and why isn't that term appropriate for both genders?
tofuandbeer
(1,314 posts)Myrina
(12,296 posts)Sad for her, that she still can't/won't accept reality.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)I still think that pension should have been abrogated due to criminal conduct.
Walk away
(9,494 posts)Who knows how many lies she told to cover up his abuses while he was alive. Every time I read about her running her crap I think the same thing. How guilty is she?
LynneSin
(95,337 posts)it starts to sound like the truth, at least in the eyes of the one who is saying the lie.
get the red out
(13,468 posts)It is really hard to say how someone keeps up this kind of talk. Being complicit in the crime is certainly possible. It was paying of for her financially to be at least tacitly supportive of his "fun". She might think if she keeps up the act people will at least not blame HER.
She may have told herself that it really didn't matter what he did to those kids because they were "better off" for the help they received from his charity and the stuff he gave them. Which is insane, but there are people who can believe that kind of crap.
Sick, sick stuff no matter why she keeps up this pretense.
Hubert Flottz
(37,726 posts)She must be upset by the cold shoulders she keeps running into wherever she roams. Matt Liar probably wasn't too hard on Sandusky's wife in his probing of the witless.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)LynneSin
(95,337 posts)Come on someone actually witnessed him raping a young boy in the lockerroom shower. She needs to get her head out of her ass and wake up to the fact that she was married to a monster. Until then she can rot in hell with her husband.
ForgoTheConsequence
(4,869 posts)Heartless asshole.
VA_Jill
(9,994 posts)Enabler-in-chief. She is the one who doesn't want to lose out on any money!
Hubert Flottz
(37,726 posts)Gold Rush, in Happy Valley.
Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)VA_Jill
(9,994 posts)She oughta be. A little pot would do wonders for her!
olddad56
(5,732 posts)was she in the locker room when he took showers with at least one of the kids?
iandhr
(6,852 posts)Walk away
(9,494 posts)Dustlawyer
(10,497 posts)Does she think that lawyers are so uniformly dirty that we somehow find people to fabricate this shit over and over? We worked hard to get through college, law school and pass the Bar exams, but we are willing to throw it all away and go to jail to fabricate a fake lawsuit that would be scrutinized by national media? I don't think so and I am tired of this crap. Most lawyers are honest believe or not! There are unscrupulous people in every profession, I think it has more to do with the fear that people have for attorneys since we could surely ruin your day. You won't hear from me unless you did something wrong or made a very bad mistake. We police our own very well in order to protect what little good reputation we have with the general public. If doctors worked as hard as lawyers in policing their own medical malpractice would almost be a thing of the past. Six percent of the doctors commit 90% of the malpractice. Sorry for the rant down the rabbit trail but I get so many RW nut jobs telling me that their case is legitimate, unlike most of my other cases. That is what one just told me like it was a given that most of my docket were made up of frivolous lawsuits. Just so you know, it is hard enough to get a jury to award money to a victim in a clear case of liability since almost all Republicans believe you should just accept and deal with it instead of sue, unless of course it happens to them. I do get pleasure when I can tell those people that due to the tort reform they supported they are capped on damages or no longer have a claim. The looks on their faces is priceless when they bleat, "but I have a REAL case!"
warrant46
(2,205 posts)Dustlawyer
(10,497 posts)JoeyT
(6,785 posts)It's related to their reason for thinking feeding poor kids is a bad thing or that people that can't afford rent should learn to be waterproof.
Apparently it's an affront to justice or something to have someone that knows how the system works representing the little people in civil court or criminal trials. Anything that brings the have-nots closer to anything remotely resembling equal footing is going to bring about a wailing and gnashing of teeth.
Ecumenist
(6,086 posts)Should be illegal UNLESS they're somehow involved. Sucks to be them in places where this is law.
surrealAmerican
(11,363 posts)Why on earth did NBC put her on their show? You don't go putting this sort of nonsense on television.